Cargando…
Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores
Motivation: The recent development of high-throughput drug profiling (high content screening or HCS) provides a large amount of quantitative multidimensional data. Despite its potentials, it poses several challenges for academia and industry analysts alike. This is especially true for ranking the ef...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts232 |
_version_ | 1782235273456779264 |
---|---|
author | Hochbaum, Dorit S. Hsu, Chun-Nan Yang, Yan T. |
author_facet | Hochbaum, Dorit S. Hsu, Chun-Nan Yang, Yan T. |
author_sort | Hochbaum, Dorit S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation: The recent development of high-throughput drug profiling (high content screening or HCS) provides a large amount of quantitative multidimensional data. Despite its potentials, it poses several challenges for academia and industry analysts alike. This is especially true for ranking the effectiveness of several drugs from many thousands of images directly. This paper introduces, for the first time, a new framework for automatically ordering the performance of drugs, called fractional adjusted bi-partitional score (FABS). This general strategy takes advantage of graph-based formulations and solutions and avoids many shortfalls of traditionally used methods in practice. We experimented with FABS framework by implementing it with a specific algorithm, a variant of normalized cut—normalized cut prime (FABS-NC(′)), producing a ranking of drugs. This algorithm is known to run in polynomial time and therefore can scale well in high-throughput applications. Results: We compare the performance of FABS-NC(′) to other methods that could be used for drugs ranking. We devise two variants of the FABS algorithm: FABS-SVM that utilizes support vector machine (SVM) as black box, and FABS-Spectral that utilizes the eigenvector technique (spectral) as black box. We compare the performance of FABS-NC(′) also to three other methods that have been previously considered: center ranking (Center), PCA ranking (PCA), and graph transition energy method (GTEM). The conclusion is encouraging: FABS-NC(′) consistently outperforms all these five alternatives. FABS-SVM has the second best performance among these six methods, but is far behind FABS-NC(′): In some cases FABS-NC(′) produces over half correctly predicted ranking experiment trials than FABS-SVM. Availability: The system and data for the evaluation reported here will be made available upon request to the authors after this manuscript is accepted for publication. Contact: yxy128@berkeley.edu |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3371864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33718642012-06-11 Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores Hochbaum, Dorit S. Hsu, Chun-Nan Yang, Yan T. Bioinformatics Ismb 2012 Proceedings Papers Committee July 15 to July 19, 2012, Long Beach, Ca, Usa Motivation: The recent development of high-throughput drug profiling (high content screening or HCS) provides a large amount of quantitative multidimensional data. Despite its potentials, it poses several challenges for academia and industry analysts alike. This is especially true for ranking the effectiveness of several drugs from many thousands of images directly. This paper introduces, for the first time, a new framework for automatically ordering the performance of drugs, called fractional adjusted bi-partitional score (FABS). This general strategy takes advantage of graph-based formulations and solutions and avoids many shortfalls of traditionally used methods in practice. We experimented with FABS framework by implementing it with a specific algorithm, a variant of normalized cut—normalized cut prime (FABS-NC(′)), producing a ranking of drugs. This algorithm is known to run in polynomial time and therefore can scale well in high-throughput applications. Results: We compare the performance of FABS-NC(′) to other methods that could be used for drugs ranking. We devise two variants of the FABS algorithm: FABS-SVM that utilizes support vector machine (SVM) as black box, and FABS-Spectral that utilizes the eigenvector technique (spectral) as black box. We compare the performance of FABS-NC(′) also to three other methods that have been previously considered: center ranking (Center), PCA ranking (PCA), and graph transition energy method (GTEM). The conclusion is encouraging: FABS-NC(′) consistently outperforms all these five alternatives. FABS-SVM has the second best performance among these six methods, but is far behind FABS-NC(′): In some cases FABS-NC(′) produces over half correctly predicted ranking experiment trials than FABS-SVM. Availability: The system and data for the evaluation reported here will be made available upon request to the authors after this manuscript is accepted for publication. Contact: yxy128@berkeley.edu Oxford University Press 2012-06-15 2012-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3371864/ /pubmed/22689749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts232 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ismb 2012 Proceedings Papers Committee July 15 to July 19, 2012, Long Beach, Ca, Usa Hochbaum, Dorit S. Hsu, Chun-Nan Yang, Yan T. Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title | Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title_full | Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title_fullStr | Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title_short | Ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
title_sort | ranking of multidimensional drug profiling data by fractional-adjusted bi-partitional scores |
topic | Ismb 2012 Proceedings Papers Committee July 15 to July 19, 2012, Long Beach, Ca, Usa |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochbaumdorits rankingofmultidimensionaldrugprofilingdatabyfractionaladjustedbipartitionalscores AT hsuchunnan rankingofmultidimensionaldrugprofilingdatabyfractionaladjustedbipartitionalscores AT yangyant rankingofmultidimensionaldrugprofilingdatabyfractionaladjustedbipartitionalscores |