Cargando…

Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decrease the rate of rebleeding following endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. This study compares the efficacy of oral omeprazole vs intravenous pantoprazole in decrease of rebleeding of peptic ulcer patients. METHODS: One...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostaghni, A A, Hashemi, S A, Heydari, S T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737512
_version_ 1782235300095852544
author Mostaghni, A A
Hashemi, S A
Heydari, S T
author_facet Mostaghni, A A
Hashemi, S A
Heydari, S T
author_sort Mostaghni, A A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decrease the rate of rebleeding following endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. This study compares the efficacy of oral omeprazole vs intravenous pantoprazole in decrease of rebleeding of peptic ulcer patients. METHODS: One hundred and six patients with high risk peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either oral omeprazole (80 mg BID for 3 days) or IV pantoprazole (80 mg bolus and 8 mg/hour infusion for 3 days) followed by omeprazole (20 mg each day for 30 days). All patients underwent upper endoscopy and endoscopic therapy within 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were excluded from the study. Forty four patients were randomly allocated into omeprazole group and 41 patients to IV pantoprazole group. Both groups were similar for factors affecting the outcome. Bleeding reoccurred in five patients of omeprazole group and four patients in pantoprazole group (11.4% vs 9.8 %). The mean hospital stay and blood transfusion were not different in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oral omeprazole and IV pantoprazole had equal effects on prevention of rebleeding after endoscopic therapy in patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3371982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33719822012-06-21 Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Mostaghni, A A Hashemi, S A Heydari, S T Iran Red Crescent Med J Original Article BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decrease the rate of rebleeding following endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. This study compares the efficacy of oral omeprazole vs intravenous pantoprazole in decrease of rebleeding of peptic ulcer patients. METHODS: One hundred and six patients with high risk peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either oral omeprazole (80 mg BID for 3 days) or IV pantoprazole (80 mg bolus and 8 mg/hour infusion for 3 days) followed by omeprazole (20 mg each day for 30 days). All patients underwent upper endoscopy and endoscopic therapy within 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were excluded from the study. Forty four patients were randomly allocated into omeprazole group and 41 patients to IV pantoprazole group. Both groups were similar for factors affecting the outcome. Bleeding reoccurred in five patients of omeprazole group and four patients in pantoprazole group (11.4% vs 9.8 %). The mean hospital stay and blood transfusion were not different in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oral omeprazole and IV pantoprazole had equal effects on prevention of rebleeding after endoscopic therapy in patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers. Kowsar 2011-07 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3371982/ /pubmed/22737512 Text en Copyright © 2011, Kowsar M.P. Co. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mostaghni, A A
Hashemi, S A
Heydari, S T
Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Oral and Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor on Patients with High Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of oral and intravenous proton pump inhibitor on patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737512
work_keys_str_mv AT mostaghniaa comparisonoforalandintravenousprotonpumpinhibitoronpatientswithhighriskbleedingpepticulcersaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hashemisa comparisonoforalandintravenousprotonpumpinhibitoronpatientswithhighriskbleedingpepticulcersaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT heydarist comparisonoforalandintravenousprotonpumpinhibitoronpatientswithhighriskbleedingpepticulcersaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial