Cargando…

Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity

BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeidi, R, Banihashem, A, Hammoud, M, Gholami, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737576
_version_ 1782235311262138368
author Saeidi, R
Banihashem, A
Hammoud, M
Gholami, M
author_facet Saeidi, R
Banihashem, A
Hammoud, M
Gholami, M
author_sort Saeidi, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial study. Thirty neonates were enrolled from September 2007 to September 2008. The first group received oral rhEPO and Fe and the second, subcutaneous rhEPO and Fe. The patients’ Hb, HCT and the need to blood transfusion were recorded. We included all infants with gestational age <34 weeks, birth weight <1500 gr, without respiratory distress (O2 Saturation> 85%, FiO2 of 30%), full feeding tolerance so that oral Fe can be administrated. RESULTS: In first group (oral=PO), 65% of neonates were female and 35% were male, mean weight was 1140 g and mean GA was 32.6 weeks. In the second group (subcutaneous=SC), 42% were female and 58% were male. The mean weight was 1245 g and mean GA was 31.2 weeks and this was not statistically significant. In the first group, the mean Hb and HCT were 9.7±1.9 and 29.6±5.9 g/dl. In the second group, the figures were 12.5±1.7 and 38.8±5.1 which were statistically significant. There was no difference in the weight gain between two groups. In the first group, 3 neonates (20%) and in the second one, 1 neonate (15%) needed blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: rhEPO administration either PO or SC could prevent anemia of prematurity but SC rout was more effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3372031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33720312012-06-21 Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity Saeidi, R Banihashem, A Hammoud, M Gholami, M Iran Red Crescent Med J Short Communication BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial study. Thirty neonates were enrolled from September 2007 to September 2008. The first group received oral rhEPO and Fe and the second, subcutaneous rhEPO and Fe. The patients’ Hb, HCT and the need to blood transfusion were recorded. We included all infants with gestational age <34 weeks, birth weight <1500 gr, without respiratory distress (O2 Saturation> 85%, FiO2 of 30%), full feeding tolerance so that oral Fe can be administrated. RESULTS: In first group (oral=PO), 65% of neonates were female and 35% were male, mean weight was 1140 g and mean GA was 32.6 weeks. In the second group (subcutaneous=SC), 42% were female and 58% were male. The mean weight was 1245 g and mean GA was 31.2 weeks and this was not statistically significant. In the first group, the mean Hb and HCT were 9.7±1.9 and 29.6±5.9 g/dl. In the second group, the figures were 12.5±1.7 and 38.8±5.1 which were statistically significant. There was no difference in the weight gain between two groups. In the first group, 3 neonates (20%) and in the second one, 1 neonate (15%) needed blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: rhEPO administration either PO or SC could prevent anemia of prematurity but SC rout was more effective. Kowsar 2012-03 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3372031/ /pubmed/22737576 Text en Copyright © 2012, Kowsar Corp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Saeidi, R
Banihashem, A
Hammoud, M
Gholami, M
Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title_full Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title_short Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
title_sort comparison of oral recombinant erythropoietin and subcutaneous recombinant erythropoietin in prevention of anemia of prematurity
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737576
work_keys_str_mv AT saeidir comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity
AT banihashema comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity
AT hammoudm comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity
AT gholamim comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity