Cargando…
Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity
BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737576 |
_version_ | 1782235311262138368 |
---|---|
author | Saeidi, R Banihashem, A Hammoud, M Gholami, M |
author_facet | Saeidi, R Banihashem, A Hammoud, M Gholami, M |
author_sort | Saeidi, R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial study. Thirty neonates were enrolled from September 2007 to September 2008. The first group received oral rhEPO and Fe and the second, subcutaneous rhEPO and Fe. The patients’ Hb, HCT and the need to blood transfusion were recorded. We included all infants with gestational age <34 weeks, birth weight <1500 gr, without respiratory distress (O2 Saturation> 85%, FiO2 of 30%), full feeding tolerance so that oral Fe can be administrated. RESULTS: In first group (oral=PO), 65% of neonates were female and 35% were male, mean weight was 1140 g and mean GA was 32.6 weeks. In the second group (subcutaneous=SC), 42% were female and 58% were male. The mean weight was 1245 g and mean GA was 31.2 weeks and this was not statistically significant. In the first group, the mean Hb and HCT were 9.7±1.9 and 29.6±5.9 g/dl. In the second group, the figures were 12.5±1.7 and 38.8±5.1 which were statistically significant. There was no difference in the weight gain between two groups. In the first group, 3 neonates (20%) and in the second one, 1 neonate (15%) needed blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: rhEPO administration either PO or SC could prevent anemia of prematurity but SC rout was more effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3372031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33720312012-06-21 Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity Saeidi, R Banihashem, A Hammoud, M Gholami, M Iran Red Crescent Med J Short Communication BACKGROUND: Premature neonates are at risk for severe anemia and erythropoietin is the most important hormone in erythropoiesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of oral recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in proving erythropoiesis in neonates. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial study. Thirty neonates were enrolled from September 2007 to September 2008. The first group received oral rhEPO and Fe and the second, subcutaneous rhEPO and Fe. The patients’ Hb, HCT and the need to blood transfusion were recorded. We included all infants with gestational age <34 weeks, birth weight <1500 gr, without respiratory distress (O2 Saturation> 85%, FiO2 of 30%), full feeding tolerance so that oral Fe can be administrated. RESULTS: In first group (oral=PO), 65% of neonates were female and 35% were male, mean weight was 1140 g and mean GA was 32.6 weeks. In the second group (subcutaneous=SC), 42% were female and 58% were male. The mean weight was 1245 g and mean GA was 31.2 weeks and this was not statistically significant. In the first group, the mean Hb and HCT were 9.7±1.9 and 29.6±5.9 g/dl. In the second group, the figures were 12.5±1.7 and 38.8±5.1 which were statistically significant. There was no difference in the weight gain between two groups. In the first group, 3 neonates (20%) and in the second one, 1 neonate (15%) needed blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: rhEPO administration either PO or SC could prevent anemia of prematurity but SC rout was more effective. Kowsar 2012-03 2012-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3372031/ /pubmed/22737576 Text en Copyright © 2012, Kowsar Corp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Saeidi, R Banihashem, A Hammoud, M Gholami, M Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title | Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title_full | Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title_short | Comparison of Oral Recombinant Erythropoietin and Subcutaneous Recombinant Erythropoietin in Prevention of Anemia of Prematurity |
title_sort | comparison of oral recombinant erythropoietin and subcutaneous recombinant erythropoietin in prevention of anemia of prematurity |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saeidir comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity AT banihashema comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity AT hammoudm comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity AT gholamim comparisonoforalrecombinanterythropoietinandsubcutaneousrecombinanterythropoietininpreventionofanemiaofprematurity |