Cargando…

Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy and safety for a posterior-approach circumferential decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage for lumbar burst fractures. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical decompression and reconstruction for severely u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Tetsuya, Abe, Eiji, Miyakoshi, Naohisa, Murai, Hajime, Kobayashi, Takashi, Abe, Toshiki, Kikuchi, Kazuma, Shimada, Yoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708016
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.123
_version_ 1782235367001292800
author Suzuki, Tetsuya
Abe, Eiji
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Murai, Hajime
Kobayashi, Takashi
Abe, Toshiki
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Shimada, Yoichi
author_facet Suzuki, Tetsuya
Abe, Eiji
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Murai, Hajime
Kobayashi, Takashi
Abe, Toshiki
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Shimada, Yoichi
author_sort Suzuki, Tetsuya
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy and safety for a posterior-approach circumferential decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage for lumbar burst fractures. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical decompression and reconstruction for severely unstable lumbar burst fractures requires an anterior or combined anteroposterior approach. Furthermore, anterior instrumentation for the lower lumbar is restricted through the presence of major vessels. METHODS: Three patients with an L1 burst fracture, one with an L3 and three with an L4 (5 men, 2 women; mean age, 65.0 years) who underwent circumferential decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage through a posterior approach alone and a 4-year follow-up were evaluated regarding the clinical and radiological course. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 277 minutes. Mean blood loss was 471 ml. In 6 patients, the Frankel score improved more than one grade after surgery, and the remaining patient was at Frankel E both before and after surgery. Mean preoperative visual analogue scale was 7.0, improving to 0.7 postoperatively. Local kyphosis improved from 15.7° before surgery to -11.0° after surgery. In 3 cases regarding the mid to lower lumbar patients, local kyphosis increased more than 10° by 3 months following surgery, due to subsidence of the cages. One patient developed severe tilting and subsidence of the cage, requiring additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results concerning this small series suggest the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this treatment for unstable lumbar burst fractures. This technique from a posterior approach alone offers several advantages over traditional anterior or combined anteroposterior approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3372547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33725472012-06-15 Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures Suzuki, Tetsuya Abe, Eiji Miyakoshi, Naohisa Murai, Hajime Kobayashi, Takashi Abe, Toshiki Kikuchi, Kazuma Shimada, Yoichi Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy and safety for a posterior-approach circumferential decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage for lumbar burst fractures. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical decompression and reconstruction for severely unstable lumbar burst fractures requires an anterior or combined anteroposterior approach. Furthermore, anterior instrumentation for the lower lumbar is restricted through the presence of major vessels. METHODS: Three patients with an L1 burst fracture, one with an L3 and three with an L4 (5 men, 2 women; mean age, 65.0 years) who underwent circumferential decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage through a posterior approach alone and a 4-year follow-up were evaluated regarding the clinical and radiological course. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 277 minutes. Mean blood loss was 471 ml. In 6 patients, the Frankel score improved more than one grade after surgery, and the remaining patient was at Frankel E both before and after surgery. Mean preoperative visual analogue scale was 7.0, improving to 0.7 postoperatively. Local kyphosis improved from 15.7° before surgery to -11.0° after surgery. In 3 cases regarding the mid to lower lumbar patients, local kyphosis increased more than 10° by 3 months following surgery, due to subsidence of the cages. One patient developed severe tilting and subsidence of the cage, requiring additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results concerning this small series suggest the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this treatment for unstable lumbar burst fractures. This technique from a posterior approach alone offers several advantages over traditional anterior or combined anteroposterior approaches. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2012-06 2012-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3372547/ /pubmed/22708016 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.123 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Suzuki, Tetsuya
Abe, Eiji
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Murai, Hajime
Kobayashi, Takashi
Abe, Toshiki
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Shimada, Yoichi
Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title_full Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title_fullStr Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title_short Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium Mesh Cage through a Posterior Approach Alone for the Treatment of Lumbar Burst Fractures
title_sort anterior decompression and shortening reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage through a posterior approach alone for the treatment of lumbar burst fractures
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708016
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.123
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukitetsuya anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT abeeiji anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT miyakoshinaohisa anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT muraihajime anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT kobayashitakashi anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT abetoshiki anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT kikuchikazuma anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures
AT shimadayoichi anteriordecompressionandshorteningreconstructionwithatitaniummeshcagethroughaposteriorapproachaloneforthetreatmentoflumbarburstfractures