Cargando…

Complications and Morbidities of Mini-open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 179 Patients

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study including 179 patients who underwent oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at one institution. PURPOSE: To report the complications associated with a minimally invasive technique of a retroperitoneal anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine. OVERVIEW OF LITERAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvestre, Clément, Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc, Hilmi, Radwan, Roussouly, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study including 179 patients who underwent oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at one institution. PURPOSE: To report the complications associated with a minimally invasive technique of a retroperitoneal anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Different approaches to the lumbar spine have been proposed, but they are associated with an increased risk of complications and a longer operation. METHODS: A total of 179 patients with previous posterior instrumented fusion undergoing OLIF were included. The technique is described in terms of: the number of levels fused, operative time and blood loss. Persurgical and postsurgical complications were noted. RESULTS: Patients were age 54.1 ± 10.6 with a BMI of 24.8 ± 4.1 kg/m(2). The procedure was performed in the lumbar spine at L1-L2 in 4, L2-L3 in 54, L3-L4 in 120, L4-L5 in 134, and L5-S1 in 6 patients. It was done at 1 level in 56, 2 levels in 107, and 3 levels in 16 patients. Surgery time and blood loss were, respectively, 32.5 ± 13.2 minutes and 57 ± 131 ml per level fused. There were 19 patients with a single complication and one with two complications, including two patients with postoperative radiculopathy after L3-5 OLIF. There was no abdominal weakness or herniation. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive OLIF can be performed easily and safely in the lumbar spine from L2 to L5, and at L1-2 for selected cases. Up to 3 levels can be addressed through a 'sliding window'. It is associated with minimal blood loss and short operations, and with decreased risk of abdominal wall weakness or herniation.