Cargando…

Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been describe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maas, K. W., Biere, S. S. A. Y., Scheepers, J. J. G., Gisbertz, S. S., Turrado Rodriguez, V., van der Peet, D. L., Cuesta, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2149-z
_version_ 1782235375001927680
author Maas, K. W.
Biere, S. S. A. Y.
Scheepers, J. J. G.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Turrado Rodriguez, V.
van der Peet, D. L.
Cuesta, M. A.
author_facet Maas, K. W.
Biere, S. S. A. Y.
Scheepers, J. J. G.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Turrado Rodriguez, V.
van der Peet, D. L.
Cuesta, M. A.
author_sort Maas, K. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been described. A literature search on the current techniques and approaches for intrathoracic anastomosis was held. The studies were evaluated on leakage and stenosis rate of the anastomosis. METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was used for comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review. The most frequent applied technique was the stapled anastomosis. Stapled anastomoses can be divided into a transthoracic or a transoral introduction. This stapled approach can be performed with a circular or linear stapler. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10%. The reported anastomotic stenosis rate ranges from 0 to 27.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This review has found no important differences between the two most frequently used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil and the transthoracic. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3372777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33727772012-06-14 Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers Maas, K. W. Biere, S. S. A. Y. Scheepers, J. J. G. Gisbertz, S. S. Turrado Rodriguez, V. van der Peet, D. L. Cuesta, M. A. Surg Endosc Review BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is one of the approaches used worldwide for treating esophageal cancer. Optimization of this approach and especially identifying the ideal intrathoracic anastomosis technique is needed. To date, different types of anastomosis have been described. A literature search on the current techniques and approaches for intrathoracic anastomosis was held. The studies were evaluated on leakage and stenosis rate of the anastomosis. METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was used for comprehensive literature search by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review. The most frequent applied technique was the stapled anastomosis. Stapled anastomoses can be divided into a transthoracic or a transoral introduction. This stapled approach can be performed with a circular or linear stapler. The reported anastomotic leakage rate ranges from 0 to 10%. The reported anastomotic stenosis rate ranges from 0 to 27.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This review has found no important differences between the two most frequently used stapled anastomoses: the transoral introduction of the anvil and the transthoracic. Clinical trials are needed to compare different methods to improve the quality of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy. Springer-Verlag 2012-02-01 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3372777/ /pubmed/22294057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2149-z Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Maas, K. W.
Biere, S. S. A. Y.
Scheepers, J. J. G.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Turrado Rodriguez, V.
van der Peet, D. L.
Cuesta, M. A.
Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title_full Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title_fullStr Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title_short Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
title_sort minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after ivor lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2149-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maaskw minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT bieressay minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT scheepersjjg minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT gisbertzss minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT turradorodriguezv minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT vanderpeetdl minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers
AT cuestama minimallyinvasiveintrathoracicanastomosisafterivorlewisesophagectomyforcancerareviewoftransoralortransthoracicuseofstaplers