Cargando…

A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010

INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilchrist, Siobhan, Schieb, Linda, Mukhtar, Qaiser, Valderrama, Amy, Yoon, Paula, Sasson, Comilla, McNally, Bryan, Schooley, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22420314
_version_ 1782235391307284480
author Gilchrist, Siobhan
Schieb, Linda
Mukhtar, Qaiser
Valderrama, Amy
Yoon, Paula
Sasson, Comilla
McNally, Bryan
Schooley, Michael
author_facet Gilchrist, Siobhan
Schieb, Linda
Mukhtar, Qaiser
Valderrama, Amy
Yoon, Paula
Sasson, Comilla
McNally, Bryan
Schooley, Michael
author_sort Gilchrist, Siobhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have been enacted to create programs that increase the public availability of these devices. The objective of this study was to describe each state's legal requirements for recommended PAD program elements. METHODS: We reviewed state laws and described the extent to which 13 PAD program elements are mandated in each state. RESULTS: No jurisdiction requires all 13 PAD program elements, 18% require at least 10 elements, and 31% require 3 or fewer elements. All jurisdictions provide some level of immunity to AED users, 60% require PAD maintenance, 59% require emergency medical service notification, 55% impose training requirements, and 41% require medical oversight. Few jurisdictions require a quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: PAD programs in many states are at risk of failure because critical elements such as maintenance, medical oversight, emergency medical service notification, and continuous quality improvement are not required. Policy makers should consider strengthening PAD policies by enacting laws that can reduce the time from collapse to shock, such as requiring the strategic placement of AEDs in high-risk locations or mandatory PAD registries that are coordinated with local EMS and dispatch centers. Further research is needed to identify the most effective PAD policies for increasing AED use by lay persons and improving survival rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3372977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33729772012-08-30 A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 Gilchrist, Siobhan Schieb, Linda Mukhtar, Qaiser Valderrama, Amy Yoon, Paula Sasson, Comilla McNally, Bryan Schooley, Michael Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have been enacted to create programs that increase the public availability of these devices. The objective of this study was to describe each state's legal requirements for recommended PAD program elements. METHODS: We reviewed state laws and described the extent to which 13 PAD program elements are mandated in each state. RESULTS: No jurisdiction requires all 13 PAD program elements, 18% require at least 10 elements, and 31% require 3 or fewer elements. All jurisdictions provide some level of immunity to AED users, 60% require PAD maintenance, 59% require emergency medical service notification, 55% impose training requirements, and 41% require medical oversight. Few jurisdictions require a quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: PAD programs in many states are at risk of failure because critical elements such as maintenance, medical oversight, emergency medical service notification, and continuous quality improvement are not required. Policy makers should consider strengthening PAD policies by enacting laws that can reduce the time from collapse to shock, such as requiring the strategic placement of AEDs in high-risk locations or mandatory PAD registries that are coordinated with local EMS and dispatch centers. Further research is needed to identify the most effective PAD policies for increasing AED use by lay persons and improving survival rates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3372977/ /pubmed/22420314 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gilchrist, Siobhan
Schieb, Linda
Mukhtar, Qaiser
Valderrama, Amy
Yoon, Paula
Sasson, Comilla
McNally, Bryan
Schooley, Michael
A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title_full A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title_fullStr A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title_full_unstemmed A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title_short A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
title_sort summary of public access defibrillation laws, united states, 2010
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22420314
work_keys_str_mv AT gilchristsiobhan asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT schieblinda asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT mukhtarqaiser asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT valderramaamy asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT yoonpaula asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT sassoncomilla asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT mcnallybryan asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT schooleymichael asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT gilchristsiobhan summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT schieblinda summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT mukhtarqaiser summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT valderramaamy summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT yoonpaula summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT sassoncomilla summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT mcnallybryan summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010
AT schooleymichael summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010