Cargando…
A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010
INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22420314 |
_version_ | 1782235391307284480 |
---|---|
author | Gilchrist, Siobhan Schieb, Linda Mukhtar, Qaiser Valderrama, Amy Yoon, Paula Sasson, Comilla McNally, Bryan Schooley, Michael |
author_facet | Gilchrist, Siobhan Schieb, Linda Mukhtar, Qaiser Valderrama, Amy Yoon, Paula Sasson, Comilla McNally, Bryan Schooley, Michael |
author_sort | Gilchrist, Siobhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have been enacted to create programs that increase the public availability of these devices. The objective of this study was to describe each state's legal requirements for recommended PAD program elements. METHODS: We reviewed state laws and described the extent to which 13 PAD program elements are mandated in each state. RESULTS: No jurisdiction requires all 13 PAD program elements, 18% require at least 10 elements, and 31% require 3 or fewer elements. All jurisdictions provide some level of immunity to AED users, 60% require PAD maintenance, 59% require emergency medical service notification, 55% impose training requirements, and 41% require medical oversight. Few jurisdictions require a quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: PAD programs in many states are at risk of failure because critical elements such as maintenance, medical oversight, emergency medical service notification, and continuous quality improvement are not required. Policy makers should consider strengthening PAD policies by enacting laws that can reduce the time from collapse to shock, such as requiring the strategic placement of AEDs in high-risk locations or mandatory PAD registries that are coordinated with local EMS and dispatch centers. Further research is needed to identify the most effective PAD policies for increasing AED use by lay persons and improving survival rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3372977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33729772012-08-30 A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 Gilchrist, Siobhan Schieb, Linda Mukhtar, Qaiser Valderrama, Amy Yoon, Paula Sasson, Comilla McNally, Bryan Schooley, Michael Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: On average, less than 8% of people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive. However, death from sudden cardiac arrest is preventable if a bystander quickly retrieves and applies an automated external defibrillator (AED). Public access defibrillation (PAD) policies have been enacted to create programs that increase the public availability of these devices. The objective of this study was to describe each state's legal requirements for recommended PAD program elements. METHODS: We reviewed state laws and described the extent to which 13 PAD program elements are mandated in each state. RESULTS: No jurisdiction requires all 13 PAD program elements, 18% require at least 10 elements, and 31% require 3 or fewer elements. All jurisdictions provide some level of immunity to AED users, 60% require PAD maintenance, 59% require emergency medical service notification, 55% impose training requirements, and 41% require medical oversight. Few jurisdictions require a quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: PAD programs in many states are at risk of failure because critical elements such as maintenance, medical oversight, emergency medical service notification, and continuous quality improvement are not required. Policy makers should consider strengthening PAD policies by enacting laws that can reduce the time from collapse to shock, such as requiring the strategic placement of AEDs in high-risk locations or mandatory PAD registries that are coordinated with local EMS and dispatch centers. Further research is needed to identify the most effective PAD policies for increasing AED use by lay persons and improving survival rates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3372977/ /pubmed/22420314 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gilchrist, Siobhan Schieb, Linda Mukhtar, Qaiser Valderrama, Amy Yoon, Paula Sasson, Comilla McNally, Bryan Schooley, Michael A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title | A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title_full | A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title_fullStr | A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title_short | A Summary of Public Access Defibrillation Laws, United States, 2010 |
title_sort | summary of public access defibrillation laws, united states, 2010 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3372977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22420314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilchristsiobhan asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT schieblinda asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT mukhtarqaiser asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT valderramaamy asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT yoonpaula asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT sassoncomilla asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT mcnallybryan asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT schooleymichael asummaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT gilchristsiobhan summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT schieblinda summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT mukhtarqaiser summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT valderramaamy summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT yoonpaula summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT sassoncomilla summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT mcnallybryan summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 AT schooleymichael summaryofpublicaccessdefibrillationlawsunitedstates2010 |