Cargando…
Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich
Graded exams are prerequisites for the admission to the medical state examination. Accordingly the exams must be of good quality in order to allow benchmarking with the faculty and between different universities. Criteria for good quality need to be considered - namely objectivity, validity and reli...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000812 |
_version_ | 1782235602698108928 |
---|---|
author | Boeder, Niklas Holzer, Matthias Schelling, Jörg |
author_facet | Boeder, Niklas Holzer, Matthias Schelling, Jörg |
author_sort | Boeder, Niklas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Graded exams are prerequisites for the admission to the medical state examination. Accordingly the exams must be of good quality in order to allow benchmarking with the faculty and between different universities. Criteria for good quality need to be considered - namely objectivity, validity and reliability. The guidelines for the processing of exams published by the GMA are supposed to help maintaining those criteria. In 2008 the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich fulfils only 14 of 18 items. A review process, appropriate training of the staff and the introduction of the IMSm software were the main changes that helped to improve the ‘GMA-score’ to 30 fulfilled items. We see the introduction of the IMSm system as our biggest challenge ahead. IMSm helps to streamline the necessary workflow and improves their quality (e.g. by the detection of cueing, item analysis). Overall, we evaluate the steps to improve the exam process as very positive. We plan to engage co-workers outside the department to assist in the various review processes in the future. Furthermore we think it might be of value to get into contact with other departments and faculties to benefit from each other’s question pools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3374138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33741382012-06-26 Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich Boeder, Niklas Holzer, Matthias Schelling, Jörg GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Graded exams are prerequisites for the admission to the medical state examination. Accordingly the exams must be of good quality in order to allow benchmarking with the faculty and between different universities. Criteria for good quality need to be considered - namely objectivity, validity and reliability. The guidelines for the processing of exams published by the GMA are supposed to help maintaining those criteria. In 2008 the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich fulfils only 14 of 18 items. A review process, appropriate training of the staff and the introduction of the IMSm software were the main changes that helped to improve the ‘GMA-score’ to 30 fulfilled items. We see the introduction of the IMSm system as our biggest challenge ahead. IMSm helps to streamline the necessary workflow and improves their quality (e.g. by the detection of cueing, item analysis). Overall, we evaluate the steps to improve the exam process as very positive. We plan to engage co-workers outside the department to assist in the various review processes in the future. Furthermore we think it might be of value to get into contact with other departments and faculties to benefit from each other’s question pools. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3374138/ /pubmed/22737197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000812 Text en Copyright © 2012 Boeder et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Boeder, Niklas Holzer, Matthias Schelling, Jörg Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title | Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title_full | Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title_fullStr | Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title_full_unstemmed | Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title_short | Realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the Department of General Medicine at the University of Munich |
title_sort | realisation of the guidelines for faculty-internal exams at the department of general medicine at the university of munich |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boederniklas realisationoftheguidelinesforfacultyinternalexamsatthedepartmentofgeneralmedicineattheuniversityofmunich AT holzermatthias realisationoftheguidelinesforfacultyinternalexamsatthedepartmentofgeneralmedicineattheuniversityofmunich AT schellingjorg realisationoftheguidelinesforfacultyinternalexamsatthedepartmentofgeneralmedicineattheuniversityofmunich |