Cargando…

Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males

INTRODUCTION: The daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning. METHODS: Twelv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munsters, Marjet J. M., Saris, Wim H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038632
_version_ 1782235692212944896
author Munsters, Marjet J. M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
author_facet Munsters, Marjet J. M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
author_sort Munsters, Marjet J. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning. METHODS: Twelve (BMI:21.6±0.6 kg/m(2)) healthy male subjects stayed after 3 days of food intake and physical activity standardization 2×36 hours in a respiration chamber to measure substrate partitioning. All subjects randomly received two isoenergetic diets with a Low meal Frequency (3×; LFr) or a High meal Frequency (14×; HFr) consisting of 15 En% protein, 30 En% fat, and 55 En% carbohydrates. Blood was sampled at fixed time points during the day to measure metabolic markers and satiety hormones. RESULTS: Glucose and insulin profiles showed greater fluctuations, but a lower AUC of glucose in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. No differences between the frequency diets were observed on fat and carbohydrate oxidation. Though, protein oxidation and RMR (in this case SMR + DIT) were significantly increased in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. The LFr diet increased satiety and reduced hunger ratings compared with the HFr diet during the day. CONCLUSION: The higher rise and subsequently fall of insulin in the LFr diet did not lead to a higher fat oxidation as hypothesized. The LFr diet decreased glucose levels throughout the day (AUC) indicating glycemic improvements. RMR and appetite control increased in the LFr diet, which can be relevant for body weight control on the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrails.gov NCT01034293
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3374835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33748352012-06-20 Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males Munsters, Marjet J. M. Saris, Wim H. M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The daily number of meals has an effect on postprandial glucose and insulin responses, which may affect substrate partitioning and thus weight control. This study investigated the effects of meal frequency on 24 h profiles of metabolic markers and substrate partitioning. METHODS: Twelve (BMI:21.6±0.6 kg/m(2)) healthy male subjects stayed after 3 days of food intake and physical activity standardization 2×36 hours in a respiration chamber to measure substrate partitioning. All subjects randomly received two isoenergetic diets with a Low meal Frequency (3×; LFr) or a High meal Frequency (14×; HFr) consisting of 15 En% protein, 30 En% fat, and 55 En% carbohydrates. Blood was sampled at fixed time points during the day to measure metabolic markers and satiety hormones. RESULTS: Glucose and insulin profiles showed greater fluctuations, but a lower AUC of glucose in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. No differences between the frequency diets were observed on fat and carbohydrate oxidation. Though, protein oxidation and RMR (in this case SMR + DIT) were significantly increased in the LFr diet compared with the HFr diet. The LFr diet increased satiety and reduced hunger ratings compared with the HFr diet during the day. CONCLUSION: The higher rise and subsequently fall of insulin in the LFr diet did not lead to a higher fat oxidation as hypothesized. The LFr diet decreased glucose levels throughout the day (AUC) indicating glycemic improvements. RMR and appetite control increased in the LFr diet, which can be relevant for body weight control on the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrails.gov NCT01034293 Public Library of Science 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3374835/ /pubmed/22719910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038632 Text en Munsters, Saris. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munsters, Marjet J. M.
Saris, Wim H. M.
Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title_full Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title_fullStr Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title_short Effects of Meal Frequency on Metabolic Profiles and Substrate Partitioning in Lean Healthy Males
title_sort effects of meal frequency on metabolic profiles and substrate partitioning in lean healthy males
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038632
work_keys_str_mv AT munstersmarjetjm effectsofmealfrequencyonmetabolicprofilesandsubstratepartitioninginleanhealthymales
AT sariswimhm effectsofmealfrequencyonmetabolicprofilesandsubstratepartitioninginleanhealthymales