Cargando…
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296 |
_version_ | 1782235713704558592 |
---|---|
author | Clark, Michelle P. Qayed, Emad S. Kooby, David A. Maithel, Shishir K. Willingham, Field F. |
author_facet | Clark, Michelle P. Qayed, Emad S. Kooby, David A. Maithel, Shishir K. Willingham, Field F. |
author_sort | Clark, Michelle P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and summarize published studies to date of NOTES in humans. The literature review was performed using PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. Articles published in human populations between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. A review of this time period resulted in 48 studies describing procedures in 916 patients. Transcolonic and transvesicular procedures were excluded. The most common procedure was cholecystectomy (682, 75%). The most common approach was transvaginal (721, 79%). 424 procedures (46%) were pure NOTES and 491 (54%) were hybrid NOTES cases. 127 (14%) were performed in the United States of America and 789 (86%) were performed internationally. Since 2007, there has been major development in NOTES in human populations. A preponderance of published NOTES procedures were performed internationally. With further development, NOTES may make less invasive surgery available to a larger human population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3375094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33750942012-06-20 Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review Clark, Michelle P. Qayed, Emad S. Kooby, David A. Maithel, Shishir K. Willingham, Field F. Minim Invasive Surg Review Article Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and summarize published studies to date of NOTES in humans. The literature review was performed using PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. Articles published in human populations between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. A review of this time period resulted in 48 studies describing procedures in 916 patients. Transcolonic and transvesicular procedures were excluded. The most common procedure was cholecystectomy (682, 75%). The most common approach was transvaginal (721, 79%). 424 procedures (46%) were pure NOTES and 491 (54%) were hybrid NOTES cases. 127 (14%) were performed in the United States of America and 789 (86%) were performed internationally. Since 2007, there has been major development in NOTES in human populations. A preponderance of published NOTES procedures were performed internationally. With further development, NOTES may make less invasive surgery available to a larger human population. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3375094/ /pubmed/22720153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296 Text en Copyright © 2012 Michelle P. Clark et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Clark, Michelle P. Qayed, Emad S. Kooby, David A. Maithel, Shishir K. Willingham, Field F. Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title | Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title_full | Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title_fullStr | Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title_short | Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review |
title_sort | natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in humans: a review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkmichellep naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview AT qayedemads naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview AT koobydavida naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview AT maithelshishirk naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview AT willinghamfieldf naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview |