Cargando…

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Michelle P., Qayed, Emad S., Kooby, David A., Maithel, Shishir K., Willingham, Field F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296
_version_ 1782235713704558592
author Clark, Michelle P.
Qayed, Emad S.
Kooby, David A.
Maithel, Shishir K.
Willingham, Field F.
author_facet Clark, Michelle P.
Qayed, Emad S.
Kooby, David A.
Maithel, Shishir K.
Willingham, Field F.
author_sort Clark, Michelle P.
collection PubMed
description Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and summarize published studies to date of NOTES in humans. The literature review was performed using PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. Articles published in human populations between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. A review of this time period resulted in 48 studies describing procedures in 916 patients. Transcolonic and transvesicular procedures were excluded. The most common procedure was cholecystectomy (682, 75%). The most common approach was transvaginal (721, 79%). 424 procedures (46%) were pure NOTES and 491 (54%) were hybrid NOTES cases. 127 (14%) were performed in the United States of America and 789 (86%) were performed internationally. Since 2007, there has been major development in NOTES in human populations. A preponderance of published NOTES procedures were performed internationally. With further development, NOTES may make less invasive surgery available to a larger human population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3375094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33750942012-06-20 Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review Clark, Michelle P. Qayed, Emad S. Kooby, David A. Maithel, Shishir K. Willingham, Field F. Minim Invasive Surg Review Article Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) had its origins in numerous small animal studies primarily examining safety and feasibility. In human trials, safety and feasibility remain at the forefront; however, additional logistic, practical, and regulatory requirements must be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and summarize published studies to date of NOTES in humans. The literature review was performed using PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. Articles published in human populations between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. A review of this time period resulted in 48 studies describing procedures in 916 patients. Transcolonic and transvesicular procedures were excluded. The most common procedure was cholecystectomy (682, 75%). The most common approach was transvaginal (721, 79%). 424 procedures (46%) were pure NOTES and 491 (54%) were hybrid NOTES cases. 127 (14%) were performed in the United States of America and 789 (86%) were performed internationally. Since 2007, there has been major development in NOTES in human populations. A preponderance of published NOTES procedures were performed internationally. With further development, NOTES may make less invasive surgery available to a larger human population. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3375094/ /pubmed/22720153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296 Text en Copyright © 2012 Michelle P. Clark et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Clark, Michelle P.
Qayed, Emad S.
Kooby, David A.
Maithel, Shishir K.
Willingham, Field F.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title_full Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title_fullStr Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title_short Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in Humans: A Review
title_sort natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in humans: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189296
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkmichellep naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview
AT qayedemads naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview
AT koobydavida naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview
AT maithelshishirk naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview
AT willinghamfieldf naturalorificetranslumenalendoscopicsurgeryinhumansareview