Cargando…

Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors

The myosin isoform composition of the heart is dynamic in health and disease and has been shown to affect contractile velocity and force generation. While different mammalian species express different proportions of α and β myosin heavy chain, healthy human heart ventricles express these isoforms in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deacon, John C., Bloemink, Marieke J., Rezavandi, Heresh, Geeves, Michael A., Leinwand, Leslie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22349210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3
_version_ 1782235756549373952
author Deacon, John C.
Bloemink, Marieke J.
Rezavandi, Heresh
Geeves, Michael A.
Leinwand, Leslie A.
author_facet Deacon, John C.
Bloemink, Marieke J.
Rezavandi, Heresh
Geeves, Michael A.
Leinwand, Leslie A.
author_sort Deacon, John C.
collection PubMed
description The myosin isoform composition of the heart is dynamic in health and disease and has been shown to affect contractile velocity and force generation. While different mammalian species express different proportions of α and β myosin heavy chain, healthy human heart ventricles express these isoforms in a ratio of about 1:9 (α:β) while failing human ventricles express no detectable α-myosin. We report here fast-kinetic analysis of recombinant human α and β myosin heavy chain motor domains. This represents the first such analysis of any human muscle myosin motor and the first of α-myosin from any species. Our findings reveal substantial isoform differences in individual kinetic parameters, overall contractile character, and predicted cycle times. For these parameters, α-subfragment 1 (S1) is far more similar to adult fast skeletal muscle myosin isoforms than to the slow β isoform despite 91% sequence identity between the motor domains of α- and β-myosin. Among the features that differentiate α- from β-S1: the ATP hydrolysis step of α-S1 is ~ten-fold faster than β-S1, α-S1 exhibits ~five-fold weaker actin affinity than β-S1, and actin·α-S1 exhibits rapid ADP release, which is >ten-fold faster than ADP release for β-S1. Overall, the cycle times are ten-fold faster for α-S1 but the portion of time each myosin spends tightly bound to actin (the duty ratio) is similar. Sequence analysis points to regions that might underlie the basis for this finding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3375423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33754232012-06-18 Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors Deacon, John C. Bloemink, Marieke J. Rezavandi, Heresh Geeves, Michael A. Leinwand, Leslie A. Cell Mol Life Sci Research Article The myosin isoform composition of the heart is dynamic in health and disease and has been shown to affect contractile velocity and force generation. While different mammalian species express different proportions of α and β myosin heavy chain, healthy human heart ventricles express these isoforms in a ratio of about 1:9 (α:β) while failing human ventricles express no detectable α-myosin. We report here fast-kinetic analysis of recombinant human α and β myosin heavy chain motor domains. This represents the first such analysis of any human muscle myosin motor and the first of α-myosin from any species. Our findings reveal substantial isoform differences in individual kinetic parameters, overall contractile character, and predicted cycle times. For these parameters, α-subfragment 1 (S1) is far more similar to adult fast skeletal muscle myosin isoforms than to the slow β isoform despite 91% sequence identity between the motor domains of α- and β-myosin. Among the features that differentiate α- from β-S1: the ATP hydrolysis step of α-S1 is ~ten-fold faster than β-S1, α-S1 exhibits ~five-fold weaker actin affinity than β-S1, and actin·α-S1 exhibits rapid ADP release, which is >ten-fold faster than ADP release for β-S1. Overall, the cycle times are ten-fold faster for α-S1 but the portion of time each myosin spends tightly bound to actin (the duty ratio) is similar. Sequence analysis points to regions that might underlie the basis for this finding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2012-02-16 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3375423/ /pubmed/22349210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3 Text en © Springer Basel AG 2012
spellingShingle Research Article
Deacon, John C.
Bloemink, Marieke J.
Rezavandi, Heresh
Geeves, Michael A.
Leinwand, Leslie A.
Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title_full Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title_fullStr Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title_full_unstemmed Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title_short Identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
title_sort identification of functional differences between recombinant human α and β cardiac myosin motors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22349210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-0927-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deaconjohnc identificationoffunctionaldifferencesbetweenrecombinanthumanaandbcardiacmyosinmotors
AT bloeminkmariekej identificationoffunctionaldifferencesbetweenrecombinanthumanaandbcardiacmyosinmotors
AT rezavandiheresh identificationoffunctionaldifferencesbetweenrecombinanthumanaandbcardiacmyosinmotors
AT geevesmichaela identificationoffunctionaldifferencesbetweenrecombinanthumanaandbcardiacmyosinmotors
AT leinwandlesliea identificationoffunctionaldifferencesbetweenrecombinanthumanaandbcardiacmyosinmotors