Cargando…

Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheema, Gursimrat Singh, Rastogi, Amit, Singh, Vakil, Goel, Satish Chandra, Mishra, Diwakar, Arora, Sumit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719110
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369
_version_ 1782235927397007360
author Cheema, Gursimrat Singh
Rastogi, Amit
Singh, Vakil
Goel, Satish Chandra
Mishra, Diwakar
Arora, Sumit
author_facet Cheema, Gursimrat Singh
Rastogi, Amit
Singh, Vakil
Goel, Satish Chandra
Mishra, Diwakar
Arora, Sumit
author_sort Cheema, Gursimrat Singh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as modes of failure of DCS and PFN in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen freshly harvested cadaveric proximal femoral specimens were randomly assigned to three mean bone mineral density matched groups, eight of which were implanted with 95° DCS and the other eight with PFN. The constructs were made unstable to resemble a reverse oblique trochanteric fracture by removing a standard size posteromedial wedge. These constructs were subjected to computer controlled cyclic compressive loading with 200 kg at a frequency of 1 cycle/second (1 Hz) and end points of both the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The bending moment of the PFN group was approximately 50% less than that of the DCS group (P<0.0001). The PFN group resisted more number of cycles than the DCS group (P=0.03) and showed lesser number of component failures as compared with the DCS group (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The PFN is biomechanically superior to DCS for the fixation of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures of femur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3377134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33771342012-06-20 Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study Cheema, Gursimrat Singh Rastogi, Amit Singh, Vakil Goel, Satish Chandra Mishra, Diwakar Arora, Sumit Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as modes of failure of DCS and PFN in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen freshly harvested cadaveric proximal femoral specimens were randomly assigned to three mean bone mineral density matched groups, eight of which were implanted with 95° DCS and the other eight with PFN. The constructs were made unstable to resemble a reverse oblique trochanteric fracture by removing a standard size posteromedial wedge. These constructs were subjected to computer controlled cyclic compressive loading with 200 kg at a frequency of 1 cycle/second (1 Hz) and end points of both the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The bending moment of the PFN group was approximately 50% less than that of the DCS group (P<0.0001). The PFN group resisted more number of cycles than the DCS group (P=0.03) and showed lesser number of component failures as compared with the DCS group (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The PFN is biomechanically superior to DCS for the fixation of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures of femur. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3377134/ /pubmed/22719110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cheema, Gursimrat Singh
Rastogi, Amit
Singh, Vakil
Goel, Satish Chandra
Mishra, Diwakar
Arora, Sumit
Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title_full Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title_fullStr Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title_short Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
title_sort comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719110
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369
work_keys_str_mv AT cheemagursimratsingh comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT rastogiamit comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT singhvakil comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT goelsatishchandra comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT mishradiwakar comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy
AT arorasumit comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy