Cargando…
Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study
BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369 |
_version_ | 1782235927397007360 |
---|---|
author | Cheema, Gursimrat Singh Rastogi, Amit Singh, Vakil Goel, Satish Chandra Mishra, Diwakar Arora, Sumit |
author_facet | Cheema, Gursimrat Singh Rastogi, Amit Singh, Vakil Goel, Satish Chandra Mishra, Diwakar Arora, Sumit |
author_sort | Cheema, Gursimrat Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as modes of failure of DCS and PFN in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen freshly harvested cadaveric proximal femoral specimens were randomly assigned to three mean bone mineral density matched groups, eight of which were implanted with 95° DCS and the other eight with PFN. The constructs were made unstable to resemble a reverse oblique trochanteric fracture by removing a standard size posteromedial wedge. These constructs were subjected to computer controlled cyclic compressive loading with 200 kg at a frequency of 1 cycle/second (1 Hz) and end points of both the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The bending moment of the PFN group was approximately 50% less than that of the DCS group (P<0.0001). The PFN group resisted more number of cycles than the DCS group (P=0.03) and showed lesser number of component failures as compared with the DCS group (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The PFN is biomechanically superior to DCS for the fixation of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures of femur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3377134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33771342012-06-20 Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study Cheema, Gursimrat Singh Rastogi, Amit Singh, Vakil Goel, Satish Chandra Mishra, Diwakar Arora, Sumit Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Reverse oblique trochanteric fracture of femur is a distinct fracture pattern. 95° Dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) are currently the most commonly used implants for its fixation. This study aims to biomechanically compare the cutout resistance as well as modes of failure of DCS and PFN in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen freshly harvested cadaveric proximal femoral specimens were randomly assigned to three mean bone mineral density matched groups, eight of which were implanted with 95° DCS and the other eight with PFN. The constructs were made unstable to resemble a reverse oblique trochanteric fracture by removing a standard size posteromedial wedge. These constructs were subjected to computer controlled cyclic compressive loading with 200 kg at a frequency of 1 cycle/second (1 Hz) and end points of both the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The bending moment of the PFN group was approximately 50% less than that of the DCS group (P<0.0001). The PFN group resisted more number of cycles than the DCS group (P=0.03) and showed lesser number of component failures as compared with the DCS group (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The PFN is biomechanically superior to DCS for the fixation of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures of femur. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3377134/ /pubmed/22719110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cheema, Gursimrat Singh Rastogi, Amit Singh, Vakil Goel, Satish Chandra Mishra, Diwakar Arora, Sumit Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title | Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title_full | Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title_short | Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study |
title_sort | comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22719110 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheemagursimratsingh comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT rastogiamit comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT singhvakil comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT goelsatishchandra comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT mishradiwakar comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy AT arorasumit comparisonofcutoutresistanceofdynamiccondylarscrewandproximalfemoralnailinreverseobliquetrochantericfracturesabiomechanicalstudy |