Cargando…
Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations
BACKGROUND: The CMAP (Compound Muscle Action Potential) scan is a non-invasive electrodiagnostic tool, which provides a quick and visual assessment of motor unit potentials as electrophysiological components that together constitute the CMAP. The CMAP scan records the electrical activity of the musc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22546084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7221-7-4 |
_version_ | 1782235959480287232 |
---|---|
author | Maathuis, Ellen M Henderson, Robert D Drenthen, Judith Hutchinson, Nicole M Daube, Jasper R Blok, Joleen H Visser, Gerhard H |
author_facet | Maathuis, Ellen M Henderson, Robert D Drenthen, Judith Hutchinson, Nicole M Daube, Jasper R Blok, Joleen H Visser, Gerhard H |
author_sort | Maathuis, Ellen M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The CMAP (Compound Muscle Action Potential) scan is a non-invasive electrodiagnostic tool, which provides a quick and visual assessment of motor unit potentials as electrophysiological components that together constitute the CMAP. The CMAP scan records the electrical activity of the muscle (CMAP) in response to transcutaneous stimulation of the motor nerve with gradual changes in stimulus intensity. Large MUs, including those that result from collateral reinnervation, appear in the CMAP scan as so-called steps, i.e., clearly visible jumps in CMAP amplitude. The CMAP scan also provides information on nerve excitability. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the stimulation protocol used on the CMAP scan and its quantification. METHODS: The stimulus frequency (1, 2 and 3 Hz), duration (0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 ms), or number (300, 500 and 1000 stimuli) in CMAP scans of 23 subjects was systematically varied while the other two parameters were kept constant. Pain was measured by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Non-parametric paired tests were used to assess significant differences in excitability and step variables and VAS scores between the different stimulus parameter settings. RESULTS: We found no effect of stimulus frequency on CMAP scan variables or VAS scores. Stimulus duration affected excitability variables significantly, with higher stimulus intensity values for shorter stimulus durations. Step variables showed a clear trend towards increasing values with decreasing stimulus number. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol delivering 500 stimuli at a frequency of 2 Hz with a 0.1 ms pulse duration optimized CMAP scan quantification with a minimum of subject discomfort, artefact and duration of the recording. CMAP scan variables were influenced by stimulus duration and number; hence, these need to be standardized in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3377546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33775462012-06-19 Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations Maathuis, Ellen M Henderson, Robert D Drenthen, Judith Hutchinson, Nicole M Daube, Jasper R Blok, Joleen H Visser, Gerhard H J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj Research Article BACKGROUND: The CMAP (Compound Muscle Action Potential) scan is a non-invasive electrodiagnostic tool, which provides a quick and visual assessment of motor unit potentials as electrophysiological components that together constitute the CMAP. The CMAP scan records the electrical activity of the muscle (CMAP) in response to transcutaneous stimulation of the motor nerve with gradual changes in stimulus intensity. Large MUs, including those that result from collateral reinnervation, appear in the CMAP scan as so-called steps, i.e., clearly visible jumps in CMAP amplitude. The CMAP scan also provides information on nerve excitability. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the stimulation protocol used on the CMAP scan and its quantification. METHODS: The stimulus frequency (1, 2 and 3 Hz), duration (0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 ms), or number (300, 500 and 1000 stimuli) in CMAP scans of 23 subjects was systematically varied while the other two parameters were kept constant. Pain was measured by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Non-parametric paired tests were used to assess significant differences in excitability and step variables and VAS scores between the different stimulus parameter settings. RESULTS: We found no effect of stimulus frequency on CMAP scan variables or VAS scores. Stimulus duration affected excitability variables significantly, with higher stimulus intensity values for shorter stimulus durations. Step variables showed a clear trend towards increasing values with decreasing stimulus number. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol delivering 500 stimuli at a frequency of 2 Hz with a 0.1 ms pulse duration optimized CMAP scan quantification with a minimum of subject discomfort, artefact and duration of the recording. CMAP scan variables were influenced by stimulus duration and number; hence, these need to be standardized in future studies. BioMed Central 2012-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3377546/ /pubmed/22546084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7221-7-4 Text en Copyright © 2012 Maathuis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maathuis, Ellen M Henderson, Robert D Drenthen, Judith Hutchinson, Nicole M Daube, Jasper R Blok, Joleen H Visser, Gerhard H Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title | Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title_full | Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title_fullStr | Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title_short | Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations |
title_sort | optimal stimulation settings for cmap scan registrations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22546084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7221-7-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maathuisellenm optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT hendersonrobertd optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT drenthenjudith optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT hutchinsonnicolem optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT daubejasperr optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT blokjoleenh optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations AT vissergerhardh optimalstimulationsettingsforcmapscanregistrations |