Cargando…

Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether a pinhole collimator is better adapted to bremsstrahlung single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] than parallel-hole collimators and in the affirmative, to evaluate whether pinhole bremsstrahlung SPECT, including a simple model of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walrand, Stephan, Hesse, Michel, Demonceau, Georges, Pauwels, Stanislas, Jamar, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-32
_version_ 1782236003803594752
author Walrand, Stephan
Hesse, Michel
Demonceau, Georges
Pauwels, Stanislas
Jamar, François
author_facet Walrand, Stephan
Hesse, Michel
Demonceau, Georges
Pauwels, Stanislas
Jamar, François
author_sort Walrand, Stephan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether a pinhole collimator is better adapted to bremsstrahlung single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] than parallel-hole collimators and in the affirmative, to evaluate whether pinhole bremsstrahlung SPECT, including a simple model of the scatter inside the patient, could provide a fast dosimetry assessment in liver selective internal radiotherapy [SIRT]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bremsstrahlung SPECT of an abdominal-shaped phantom including one cold and five hot spheres was performed using two long-bore parallel-hole collimators: a medium-energy general-purpose [MEGP] and a high-energy general-purpose [HEGP], and also using a medium-energy pinhole [MEPH] collimator. In addition, ten helical MEPH SPECTs (acquisition time 3.6 min) of a realistic liver-SIRT phantom were also acquired. RESULTS: Without scatter correction for SPECT, MEPH SPECT provided a significantly better contrast recovery coefficient [CRC] than MEGP and HEGP SPECTs. The CRCs obtained with MEPH SPECT were still improved with the scatter correction and became comparable to those obtained with positron-emission tomography [PET] for the 36-, 30- (cold), 28-, and 24-mm-diameter spheres: CRC = 1.09, 0.59, 0.91, and 0.69, respectively, for SPECT and CRC = 1.07, 0.56, 0.84, and 0.63, respectively, for PET. However, MEPH SPECT gave the best CRC for the 19-mm-diameter sphere: CRC = 0.56 for SPECT and CRC = 0.01 for PET. The 3.6-min helical MEPH SPECT provided accurate and reproducible activity estimation for the liver-SIRT phantom: relative deviation = 10 ± 1%. CONCLUSION: Bremsstrahlung SPECT using a pinhole collimator provided a better CRC than those obtained with parallel-hole collimators. The different designs and the better attenuating material used for the collimation (tungsten instead of lead) explain this result. Further, the addition of an analytical modeling of the scattering inside the phantom resulted in an almost fully recovered contrast. This fills the gap between the performance of(90)Y-PET and bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT which is a more affordable technique and could even be used during the catheterization procedure in order to optimize the(90)Y activity to inject.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3377914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33779142012-06-19 Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom Walrand, Stephan Hesse, Michel Demonceau, Georges Pauwels, Stanislas Jamar, François EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether a pinhole collimator is better adapted to bremsstrahlung single photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] than parallel-hole collimators and in the affirmative, to evaluate whether pinhole bremsstrahlung SPECT, including a simple model of the scatter inside the patient, could provide a fast dosimetry assessment in liver selective internal radiotherapy [SIRT]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bremsstrahlung SPECT of an abdominal-shaped phantom including one cold and five hot spheres was performed using two long-bore parallel-hole collimators: a medium-energy general-purpose [MEGP] and a high-energy general-purpose [HEGP], and also using a medium-energy pinhole [MEPH] collimator. In addition, ten helical MEPH SPECTs (acquisition time 3.6 min) of a realistic liver-SIRT phantom were also acquired. RESULTS: Without scatter correction for SPECT, MEPH SPECT provided a significantly better contrast recovery coefficient [CRC] than MEGP and HEGP SPECTs. The CRCs obtained with MEPH SPECT were still improved with the scatter correction and became comparable to those obtained with positron-emission tomography [PET] for the 36-, 30- (cold), 28-, and 24-mm-diameter spheres: CRC = 1.09, 0.59, 0.91, and 0.69, respectively, for SPECT and CRC = 1.07, 0.56, 0.84, and 0.63, respectively, for PET. However, MEPH SPECT gave the best CRC for the 19-mm-diameter sphere: CRC = 0.56 for SPECT and CRC = 0.01 for PET. The 3.6-min helical MEPH SPECT provided accurate and reproducible activity estimation for the liver-SIRT phantom: relative deviation = 10 ± 1%. CONCLUSION: Bremsstrahlung SPECT using a pinhole collimator provided a better CRC than those obtained with parallel-hole collimators. The different designs and the better attenuating material used for the collimation (tungsten instead of lead) explain this result. Further, the addition of an analytical modeling of the scattering inside the phantom resulted in an almost fully recovered contrast. This fills the gap between the performance of(90)Y-PET and bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT which is a more affordable technique and could even be used during the catheterization procedure in order to optimize the(90)Y activity to inject. Springer 2011-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3377914/ /pubmed/22214246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-32 Text en Copyright © 2011 Walrand et al; licensee Springer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Walrand, Stephan
Hesse, Michel
Demonceau, Georges
Pauwels, Stanislas
Jamar, François
Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title_full Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title_fullStr Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title_full_unstemmed Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title_short Yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole SPECT: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
title_sort yttrium-90-labeled microsphere tracking during liver selective internal radiotherapy by bremsstrahlung pinhole spect: feasibility study and evaluation in an abdominal phantom
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-32
work_keys_str_mv AT walrandstephan yttrium90labeledmicrospheretrackingduringliverselectiveinternalradiotherapybybremsstrahlungpinholespectfeasibilitystudyandevaluationinanabdominalphantom
AT hessemichel yttrium90labeledmicrospheretrackingduringliverselectiveinternalradiotherapybybremsstrahlungpinholespectfeasibilitystudyandevaluationinanabdominalphantom
AT demonceaugeorges yttrium90labeledmicrospheretrackingduringliverselectiveinternalradiotherapybybremsstrahlungpinholespectfeasibilitystudyandevaluationinanabdominalphantom
AT pauwelsstanislas yttrium90labeledmicrospheretrackingduringliverselectiveinternalradiotherapybybremsstrahlungpinholespectfeasibilitystudyandevaluationinanabdominalphantom
AT jamarfrancois yttrium90labeledmicrospheretrackingduringliverselectiveinternalradiotherapybybremsstrahlungpinholespectfeasibilitystudyandevaluationinanabdominalphantom