Cargando…

Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop fast deliverable step and shoot IMRT technique. A reduction in the number of segments should theoretically be possible, whilst simultaneously maintaining plan quality, provided that the reduction is accompanied by an increased number of gantry angles....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bratengeier, Klaus, Gainey, Mark B, Flentje, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-170
_version_ 1782236006360023040
author Bratengeier, Klaus
Gainey, Mark B
Flentje, Michael
author_facet Bratengeier, Klaus
Gainey, Mark B
Flentje, Michael
author_sort Bratengeier, Klaus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop fast deliverable step and shoot IMRT technique. A reduction in the number of segments should theoretically be possible, whilst simultaneously maintaining plan quality, provided that the reduction is accompanied by an increased number of gantry angles. A benefit of this method is that the segment shaping could be performed during gantry motion, thereby reducing the delivery time. The aim was to find classes of such solutions whose plan quality can compete with conventional IMRT. MATERIALS/METHODS: A planning study was performed. Step and shoot IMRT plans were created using direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) as a reference. DMPO plans were compared to an IMRT variant having only one segment per angle ("2-Step Fast"). 2-Step Fast is based on a geometrical analysis of the topology of the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OAR). A prostate/rectum case, spine metastasis/spinal cord, breast/lung and an artificial PTV/OAR combination of the ESTRO-Quasimodo phantom were used for the study. The composite objective value (COV), a quality score, and plan delivery time were compared. The delivery time for the DMPO reference plan and the 2-Step Fast IMRT technique was measured and calculated for two different linacs, a twelve year old Siemens Primus™ ("old" linac) and two Elekta Synergy™ "S" linacs ("new" linacs). RESULTS: 2-Step Fast had comparable or better quality than the reference DMPO plan. The number of segments was smaller than for the reference plan, the number of gantry angles was between 23 and 34. For the modern linac the delivery time was always smaller than that for the reference plan. The calculated (measured) values showed a mean delivery time reduction of 21% (21%) for the new linac, and of 7% (3%) for the old linac compared to the respective DMPO reference plans. For the old linac, the data handling time per beam was the limiting factor for the treatment time reduction. CONCLUSIONS: 2-Step Fast plans are suited to reduce the delivery time, especially if the data handling time per beam is short. The plan quality can be retained or even increased for fewer segments provided more gantry angles are used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3377925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33779252012-06-20 Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments Bratengeier, Klaus Gainey, Mark B Flentje, Michael Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop fast deliverable step and shoot IMRT technique. A reduction in the number of segments should theoretically be possible, whilst simultaneously maintaining plan quality, provided that the reduction is accompanied by an increased number of gantry angles. A benefit of this method is that the segment shaping could be performed during gantry motion, thereby reducing the delivery time. The aim was to find classes of such solutions whose plan quality can compete with conventional IMRT. MATERIALS/METHODS: A planning study was performed. Step and shoot IMRT plans were created using direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) as a reference. DMPO plans were compared to an IMRT variant having only one segment per angle ("2-Step Fast"). 2-Step Fast is based on a geometrical analysis of the topology of the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OAR). A prostate/rectum case, spine metastasis/spinal cord, breast/lung and an artificial PTV/OAR combination of the ESTRO-Quasimodo phantom were used for the study. The composite objective value (COV), a quality score, and plan delivery time were compared. The delivery time for the DMPO reference plan and the 2-Step Fast IMRT technique was measured and calculated for two different linacs, a twelve year old Siemens Primus™ ("old" linac) and two Elekta Synergy™ "S" linacs ("new" linacs). RESULTS: 2-Step Fast had comparable or better quality than the reference DMPO plan. The number of segments was smaller than for the reference plan, the number of gantry angles was between 23 and 34. For the modern linac the delivery time was always smaller than that for the reference plan. The calculated (measured) values showed a mean delivery time reduction of 21% (21%) for the new linac, and of 7% (3%) for the old linac compared to the respective DMPO reference plans. For the old linac, the data handling time per beam was the limiting factor for the treatment time reduction. CONCLUSIONS: 2-Step Fast plans are suited to reduce the delivery time, especially if the data handling time per beam is short. The plan quality can be retained or even increased for fewer segments provided more gantry angles are used. BioMed Central 2011-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3377925/ /pubmed/22152490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-170 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bratengeier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bratengeier, Klaus
Gainey, Mark B
Flentje, Michael
Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title_full Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title_fullStr Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title_full_unstemmed Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title_short Fast IMRT by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
title_sort fast imrt by increasing the beam number and reducing the number of segments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-170
work_keys_str_mv AT bratengeierklaus fastimrtbyincreasingthebeamnumberandreducingthenumberofsegments
AT gaineymarkb fastimrtbyincreasingthebeamnumberandreducingthenumberofsegments
AT flentjemichael fastimrtbyincreasingthebeamnumberandreducingthenumberofsegments