Cargando…

Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?

BACKGROUND: The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) of India recommends follow-up sputum smear examination at two months into the continuation phase of treatment. The main intent of this (mid-CP) follow-up is to detect patients not responding to treatment around two-three months ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand, Kumar, Ajay M. V., Toshniwal, Manoj Nandkishor, Reddy, Raveendra H. R., Oeltmann, John E., Nair, Sreenivas Achuthan, Satyanarayana, Srinath, Dewan, Puneet Kumar, Mannan, Shamim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039296
_version_ 1782236050120245248
author Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
Toshniwal, Manoj Nandkishor
Reddy, Raveendra H. R.
Oeltmann, John E.
Nair, Sreenivas Achuthan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet Kumar
Mannan, Shamim
author_facet Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
Toshniwal, Manoj Nandkishor
Reddy, Raveendra H. R.
Oeltmann, John E.
Nair, Sreenivas Achuthan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet Kumar
Mannan, Shamim
author_sort Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) of India recommends follow-up sputum smear examination at two months into the continuation phase of treatment. The main intent of this (mid-CP) follow-up is to detect patients not responding to treatment around two-three months earlier than at the end of the treatment. However, the utility of mid-CP follow-up under programmatic conditions has been questioned. We undertook a multi-district study to determine if mid-CP follow-up is able to detect cases of treatment failures early among all types of patients with sputum smear-positive TB. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed existing records of patients with sputum smear-positive TB registered under the RNTCP in 43 districts across three states of India during a three month period in 2009. We estimated proportions of patients that could be detected as a case of treatment failure early, and assessed the impact of various policy options on laboratory workload and number needed to test to detect one case of treatment failure early. RESULTS: Of 10055 cases, mid-CP follow-up was done in 6944 (69%) cases. Mid-CP follow-up could benefit 117/8015 (1.5%) new and 206/2040 (10%) previously-treated sputum smear-positive cases by detecting their treatment failure early. Under the current policy, 31 patients had to be tested to detect one case of treatment failure early. All cases of treatment failure would still be detected early if mid-CP follow-up were discontinued for new sputum smear-positive cases who become sputum smear-negative after the intensive-phase of treatment. This would reduce the related laboratory workload by 69% and only 10 patients would need to be tested to detect one case of treatment failure early. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of mid-CP follow-up among new sputum smear-positive cases who become sputum smear-negative after completing the intensive-phase of treatment will reduce the laboratory workload without impacting overall early detection of cases of treatment failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3378531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33785312012-06-21 Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis? Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand Kumar, Ajay M. V. Toshniwal, Manoj Nandkishor Reddy, Raveendra H. R. Oeltmann, John E. Nair, Sreenivas Achuthan Satyanarayana, Srinath Dewan, Puneet Kumar Mannan, Shamim PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) of India recommends follow-up sputum smear examination at two months into the continuation phase of treatment. The main intent of this (mid-CP) follow-up is to detect patients not responding to treatment around two-three months earlier than at the end of the treatment. However, the utility of mid-CP follow-up under programmatic conditions has been questioned. We undertook a multi-district study to determine if mid-CP follow-up is able to detect cases of treatment failures early among all types of patients with sputum smear-positive TB. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed existing records of patients with sputum smear-positive TB registered under the RNTCP in 43 districts across three states of India during a three month period in 2009. We estimated proportions of patients that could be detected as a case of treatment failure early, and assessed the impact of various policy options on laboratory workload and number needed to test to detect one case of treatment failure early. RESULTS: Of 10055 cases, mid-CP follow-up was done in 6944 (69%) cases. Mid-CP follow-up could benefit 117/8015 (1.5%) new and 206/2040 (10%) previously-treated sputum smear-positive cases by detecting their treatment failure early. Under the current policy, 31 patients had to be tested to detect one case of treatment failure early. All cases of treatment failure would still be detected early if mid-CP follow-up were discontinued for new sputum smear-positive cases who become sputum smear-negative after the intensive-phase of treatment. This would reduce the related laboratory workload by 69% and only 10 patients would need to be tested to detect one case of treatment failure early. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of mid-CP follow-up among new sputum smear-positive cases who become sputum smear-negative after completing the intensive-phase of treatment will reduce the laboratory workload without impacting overall early detection of cases of treatment failure. Public Library of Science 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3378531/ /pubmed/22723991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039296 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gandhi, Mohit Padamchand
Kumar, Ajay M. V.
Toshniwal, Manoj Nandkishor
Reddy, Raveendra H. R.
Oeltmann, John E.
Nair, Sreenivas Achuthan
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dewan, Puneet Kumar
Mannan, Shamim
Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title_full Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title_fullStr Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title_full_unstemmed Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title_short Sputum Smear Microscopy at Two Months into Continuation-Phase: Should It Be Done in All Patients with Sputum Smear-Positive Tuberculosis?
title_sort sputum smear microscopy at two months into continuation-phase: should it be done in all patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039296
work_keys_str_mv AT gandhimohitpadamchand sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT kumarajaymv sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT toshniwalmanojnandkishor sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT reddyraveendrahr sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT oeltmannjohne sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT nairsreenivasachuthan sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT satyanarayanasrinath sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT dewanpuneetkumar sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis
AT mannanshamim sputumsmearmicroscopyattwomonthsintocontinuationphaseshoulditbedoneinallpatientswithsputumsmearpositivetuberculosis