Cargando…

The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing

BACKGROUND: Studies using vocoders as acoustic simulators of cochlear implants have generally focused on simulation of speech understanding, gender recognition, or music appreciation. The aim of the present experiment was to study the auditory sensation perceived by cochlear implant (CI) recipients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazard, Diane S., Marozeau, Jeremy, McDermott, Hugh J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038687
_version_ 1782236053420113920
author Lazard, Diane S.
Marozeau, Jeremy
McDermott, Hugh J.
author_facet Lazard, Diane S.
Marozeau, Jeremy
McDermott, Hugh J.
author_sort Lazard, Diane S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies using vocoders as acoustic simulators of cochlear implants have generally focused on simulation of speech understanding, gender recognition, or music appreciation. The aim of the present experiment was to study the auditory sensation perceived by cochlear implant (CI) recipients with steady electrical stimulation on the most-apical electrode. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Five unilateral CI users with contralateral residual hearing were asked to vary the parameters of an acoustic signal played to the non-implanted ear, in order to match its sensation to that of the electric stimulus. They also provided a rating of similarity between each acoustic sound they selected and the electric stimulus. On average across subjects, the sound rated as most similar was a complex signal with a concentration of energy around 523 Hz. This sound was inharmonic in 3 out of 5 subjects with a moderate, progressive increase in the spacing between the frequency components. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For these subjects, the sound sensation created by steady electric stimulation on the most-apical electrode was neither a white noise nor a pure tone, but a complex signal with a progressive increase in the spacing between the frequency components in 3 out of 5 subjects. Knowing whether the inharmonic nature of the sound was related to the fact that the non-implanted ear was impaired has to be explored in single-sided deafened patients with a contralateral CI. These results may be used in the future to better understand peripheral and central auditory processing in relation to cochlear implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3378545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33785452012-06-21 The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing Lazard, Diane S. Marozeau, Jeremy McDermott, Hugh J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies using vocoders as acoustic simulators of cochlear implants have generally focused on simulation of speech understanding, gender recognition, or music appreciation. The aim of the present experiment was to study the auditory sensation perceived by cochlear implant (CI) recipients with steady electrical stimulation on the most-apical electrode. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Five unilateral CI users with contralateral residual hearing were asked to vary the parameters of an acoustic signal played to the non-implanted ear, in order to match its sensation to that of the electric stimulus. They also provided a rating of similarity between each acoustic sound they selected and the electric stimulus. On average across subjects, the sound rated as most similar was a complex signal with a concentration of energy around 523 Hz. This sound was inharmonic in 3 out of 5 subjects with a moderate, progressive increase in the spacing between the frequency components. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For these subjects, the sound sensation created by steady electric stimulation on the most-apical electrode was neither a white noise nor a pure tone, but a complex signal with a progressive increase in the spacing between the frequency components in 3 out of 5 subjects. Knowing whether the inharmonic nature of the sound was related to the fact that the non-implanted ear was impaired has to be explored in single-sided deafened patients with a contralateral CI. These results may be used in the future to better understand peripheral and central auditory processing in relation to cochlear implants. Public Library of Science 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3378545/ /pubmed/22723876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038687 Text en Lazard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lazard, Diane S.
Marozeau, Jeremy
McDermott, Hugh J.
The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title_full The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title_fullStr The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title_full_unstemmed The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title_short The Sound Sensation of Apical Electric Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Contralateral Residual Hearing
title_sort sound sensation of apical electric stimulation in cochlear implant recipients with contralateral residual hearing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038687
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarddianes thesoundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing
AT marozeaujeremy thesoundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing
AT mcdermotthughj thesoundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing
AT lazarddianes soundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing
AT marozeaujeremy soundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing
AT mcdermotthughj soundsensationofapicalelectricstimulationincochlearimplantrecipientswithcontralateralresidualhearing