Cargando…

Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?

BACKGROUND: Rickettsia conorii conorii is the etiological agent of Mediterranean spotted fever, which is transmitted by the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. The relationship between the Rickettsia and its tick vector are still poorly understood one century after the first description of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Socolovschi, Cristina, Gaudart, Jean, Bitam, Idir, Huynh, Thi Phong, Raoult, Didier, Parola, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22724035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001697
_version_ 1782236066814623744
author Socolovschi, Cristina
Gaudart, Jean
Bitam, Idir
Huynh, Thi Phong
Raoult, Didier
Parola, Philippe
author_facet Socolovschi, Cristina
Gaudart, Jean
Bitam, Idir
Huynh, Thi Phong
Raoult, Didier
Parola, Philippe
author_sort Socolovschi, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rickettsia conorii conorii is the etiological agent of Mediterranean spotted fever, which is transmitted by the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. The relationship between the Rickettsia and its tick vector are still poorly understood one century after the first description of this disease. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An entomological survey was organized in Algeria to collect ticks from the houses of patients with spotted fever signs. Colonies of R. conorii conorii-infected and non-infected ticks were established under laboratory conditions. Gimenez staining and electron microscopy on the ovaries of infected ticks indicated heavy rickettsial infection. The transovarial transmission of R. conorii conorii in naturally infected Rh. sanguineus ticks was 100% at eleven generations, and the filial infection rate was up to 99% according to molecular analyses. No differences in life cycle duration were observed between infected and non-infected ticks held at 25°C, but the average weight of engorged females and eggs was significantly lower in infected ticks than in non-infected ticks. The eggs, larvae and unfed nymphs of infected and non-infected ticks could not tolerate low (4°C) or high (37°C) temperatures or long starvation periods. R. conorii conorii-infected engorged nymphs that were exposed to a low or high temperature for one month experienced higher mortality when they were transferred to 25°C than non-infected ticks after similar exposure. High mortality was observed in infected adults that were maintained for one month at a low or high temperature after tick-feeding on rabbits. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These preliminary results suggest that infected quiescent ticks may not survive the winter and may help explain the low prevalence of infected Rh. sanguineus in nature. Further investigations on the influence of extrinsic factors on diapaused R. conorii-infected and non-infected ticks are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3378603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33786032012-06-21 Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild? Socolovschi, Cristina Gaudart, Jean Bitam, Idir Huynh, Thi Phong Raoult, Didier Parola, Philippe PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Rickettsia conorii conorii is the etiological agent of Mediterranean spotted fever, which is transmitted by the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. The relationship between the Rickettsia and its tick vector are still poorly understood one century after the first description of this disease. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An entomological survey was organized in Algeria to collect ticks from the houses of patients with spotted fever signs. Colonies of R. conorii conorii-infected and non-infected ticks were established under laboratory conditions. Gimenez staining and electron microscopy on the ovaries of infected ticks indicated heavy rickettsial infection. The transovarial transmission of R. conorii conorii in naturally infected Rh. sanguineus ticks was 100% at eleven generations, and the filial infection rate was up to 99% according to molecular analyses. No differences in life cycle duration were observed between infected and non-infected ticks held at 25°C, but the average weight of engorged females and eggs was significantly lower in infected ticks than in non-infected ticks. The eggs, larvae and unfed nymphs of infected and non-infected ticks could not tolerate low (4°C) or high (37°C) temperatures or long starvation periods. R. conorii conorii-infected engorged nymphs that were exposed to a low or high temperature for one month experienced higher mortality when they were transferred to 25°C than non-infected ticks after similar exposure. High mortality was observed in infected adults that were maintained for one month at a low or high temperature after tick-feeding on rabbits. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These preliminary results suggest that infected quiescent ticks may not survive the winter and may help explain the low prevalence of infected Rh. sanguineus in nature. Further investigations on the influence of extrinsic factors on diapaused R. conorii-infected and non-infected ticks are required. Public Library of Science 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3378603/ /pubmed/22724035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001697 Text en Socolovschi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Socolovschi, Cristina
Gaudart, Jean
Bitam, Idir
Huynh, Thi Phong
Raoult, Didier
Parola, Philippe
Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title_full Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title_fullStr Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title_full_unstemmed Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title_short Why Are There So Few Rickettsia conorii conorii-Infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks in the Wild?
title_sort why are there so few rickettsia conorii conorii-infected rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks in the wild?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3378603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22724035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001697
work_keys_str_mv AT socolovschicristina whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild
AT gaudartjean whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild
AT bitamidir whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild
AT huynhthiphong whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild
AT raoultdidier whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild
AT parolaphilippe whyaretheresofewrickettsiaconoriiconoriiinfectedrhipicephalussanguineusticksinthewild