Cargando…

Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective

Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Larry E., King, Molly K., Wayne, Sharon J., Kalishman, Summers G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098
_version_ 1782236113775099904
author Davis, Larry E.
King, Molly K.
Wayne, Sharon J.
Kalishman, Summers G.
author_facet Davis, Larry E.
King, Molly K.
Wayne, Sharon J.
Kalishman, Summers G.
author_sort Davis, Larry E.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an attending neurologist. The patient is then asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous, Likert scale questionnaire rating the student on friendliness, listening to the patient, respecting the patient, using understandable language, and grooming. For students who had completed 1 year of residency these professionalism ratings were compared with those from their residency director. Results: Seven hundred forty-two questionnaires for 165 clerkship students from 2007 to 2009 were analyzed. Eighty-three percent of forms were returned with an average of 5 per student. In 64% of questionnaires, patients rated students very good in all five categories; in 35% patients selected either very good or good ratings; and <1% rated any student fair. No students were rated poor or very poor. Sixty-two percent of patients wrote complimentary comments about the students. From the Class of 2008, 52% of students received “better than their peers” professionalism ratings from their PGY1 residency directors and only one student was rated “below their peers.” Conclusion: This questionnaire allowed patient perceptions of their students’ communication/professionalism skills to be evaluated in a systematic manner. Residency director ratings of professionalism of the same students at the end of their first year of residency confirms continued professional behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3379033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33790332012-06-21 Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective Davis, Larry E. King, Molly K. Wayne, Sharon J. Kalishman, Summers G. Front Neurol Neurology Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an attending neurologist. The patient is then asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous, Likert scale questionnaire rating the student on friendliness, listening to the patient, respecting the patient, using understandable language, and grooming. For students who had completed 1 year of residency these professionalism ratings were compared with those from their residency director. Results: Seven hundred forty-two questionnaires for 165 clerkship students from 2007 to 2009 were analyzed. Eighty-three percent of forms were returned with an average of 5 per student. In 64% of questionnaires, patients rated students very good in all five categories; in 35% patients selected either very good or good ratings; and <1% rated any student fair. No students were rated poor or very poor. Sixty-two percent of patients wrote complimentary comments about the students. From the Class of 2008, 52% of students received “better than their peers” professionalism ratings from their PGY1 residency directors and only one student was rated “below their peers.” Conclusion: This questionnaire allowed patient perceptions of their students’ communication/professionalism skills to be evaluated in a systematic manner. Residency director ratings of professionalism of the same students at the end of their first year of residency confirms continued professional behavior. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3379033/ /pubmed/22723790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098 Text en Copyright © 2012 Davis, King, Wayne and Kalishman. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Davis, Larry E.
King, Molly K.
Wayne, Sharon J.
Kalishman, Summers G.
Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title_full Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title_fullStr Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title_short Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
title_sort evaluating medical student communication/professionalism skills from a patient’s perspective
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098
work_keys_str_mv AT davislarrye evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective
AT kingmollyk evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective
AT waynesharonj evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective
AT kalishmansummersg evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective