Cargando…
Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective
Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098 |
_version_ | 1782236113775099904 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Larry E. King, Molly K. Wayne, Sharon J. Kalishman, Summers G. |
author_facet | Davis, Larry E. King, Molly K. Wayne, Sharon J. Kalishman, Summers G. |
author_sort | Davis, Larry E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an attending neurologist. The patient is then asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous, Likert scale questionnaire rating the student on friendliness, listening to the patient, respecting the patient, using understandable language, and grooming. For students who had completed 1 year of residency these professionalism ratings were compared with those from their residency director. Results: Seven hundred forty-two questionnaires for 165 clerkship students from 2007 to 2009 were analyzed. Eighty-three percent of forms were returned with an average of 5 per student. In 64% of questionnaires, patients rated students very good in all five categories; in 35% patients selected either very good or good ratings; and <1% rated any student fair. No students were rated poor or very poor. Sixty-two percent of patients wrote complimentary comments about the students. From the Class of 2008, 52% of students received “better than their peers” professionalism ratings from their PGY1 residency directors and only one student was rated “below their peers.” Conclusion: This questionnaire allowed patient perceptions of their students’ communication/professionalism skills to be evaluated in a systematic manner. Residency director ratings of professionalism of the same students at the end of their first year of residency confirms continued professional behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3379033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33790332012-06-21 Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective Davis, Larry E. King, Molly K. Wayne, Sharon J. Kalishman, Summers G. Front Neurol Neurology Objective: Evaluate medical students’ communication and professionalism skills from the perspective of the ambulatory patient and later compare these skills in their first year of residency. Methods: Students in third year neurology clerkship clinics see patients alone followed by a revisit with an attending neurologist. The patient is then asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous, Likert scale questionnaire rating the student on friendliness, listening to the patient, respecting the patient, using understandable language, and grooming. For students who had completed 1 year of residency these professionalism ratings were compared with those from their residency director. Results: Seven hundred forty-two questionnaires for 165 clerkship students from 2007 to 2009 were analyzed. Eighty-three percent of forms were returned with an average of 5 per student. In 64% of questionnaires, patients rated students very good in all five categories; in 35% patients selected either very good or good ratings; and <1% rated any student fair. No students were rated poor or very poor. Sixty-two percent of patients wrote complimentary comments about the students. From the Class of 2008, 52% of students received “better than their peers” professionalism ratings from their PGY1 residency directors and only one student was rated “below their peers.” Conclusion: This questionnaire allowed patient perceptions of their students’ communication/professionalism skills to be evaluated in a systematic manner. Residency director ratings of professionalism of the same students at the end of their first year of residency confirms continued professional behavior. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3379033/ /pubmed/22723790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098 Text en Copyright © 2012 Davis, King, Wayne and Kalishman. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Davis, Larry E. King, Molly K. Wayne, Sharon J. Kalishman, Summers G. Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title | Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title_full | Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title_short | Evaluating Medical Student Communication/Professionalism Skills from a Patient’s Perspective |
title_sort | evaluating medical student communication/professionalism skills from a patient’s perspective |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davislarrye evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective AT kingmollyk evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective AT waynesharonj evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective AT kalishmansummersg evaluatingmedicalstudentcommunicationprofessionalismskillsfromapatientsperspective |