Cargando…

Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial

OBJECTIVE: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial reported no differences in most cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes between intensive and standard blood pressure therapy in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. Many such individual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barzilay, Joshua I., Howard, Annie G., Evans, Gregory W., Fleg, Jerome L., Cohen, Robert M., Booth, Gillian L., Kimel, Angela R., Pedley, Carolyn F., Cushman, William C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723577
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1827
_version_ 1782236222467342336
author Barzilay, Joshua I.
Howard, Annie G.
Evans, Gregory W.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Cohen, Robert M.
Booth, Gillian L.
Kimel, Angela R.
Pedley, Carolyn F.
Cushman, William C.
author_facet Barzilay, Joshua I.
Howard, Annie G.
Evans, Gregory W.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Cohen, Robert M.
Booth, Gillian L.
Kimel, Angela R.
Pedley, Carolyn F.
Cushman, William C.
author_sort Barzilay, Joshua I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial reported no differences in most cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes between intensive and standard blood pressure therapy in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. Many such individuals are centrally obese. Here we evaluate whether the trial outcomes varied by the level of central obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cohort included 4,687 people (47.7% women) with DM and hypertension. Mean age was 62.2, and mean follow-up was 4.7 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two blood pressure treatment strategies: intensive (systolic <120 mmHg) or standard (systolic <140 mmHg). Sex-specific quartiles of waist-to-height ratio were used as the measure of central obesity. The primary ACCORD outcome (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or CVD death) and three secondary outcomes (nonfatal MI, fatal or nonfatal stroke, and CVD death) were examined using proportional hazard models. RESULTS: There was no evidence that the effect of intensively lowering blood pressure differed by quartile of waist-to-height ratio for any of the four outcomes (P > 0.25 in all cases). Controlling for waist-to-height quartile had no significant impact on previously published results for intensive blood pressure therapy. Waist-to-height ratio was significantly related to CVD mortality (hazard ratio 2.32 [95% CI 1.40–3.83], P = 0.0009 comparing the heaviest to lightest quartiles), but not to the other outcomes (P > 0.09 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lowering of blood pressure versus standard treatment does not ameliorate CVD risk in individuals with DM and hypertension. These results did not vary by quartile of waist-to-height ratio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3379577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33795772013-07-01 Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial Barzilay, Joshua I. Howard, Annie G. Evans, Gregory W. Fleg, Jerome L. Cohen, Robert M. Booth, Gillian L. Kimel, Angela R. Pedley, Carolyn F. Cushman, William C. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial reported no differences in most cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes between intensive and standard blood pressure therapy in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. Many such individuals are centrally obese. Here we evaluate whether the trial outcomes varied by the level of central obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cohort included 4,687 people (47.7% women) with DM and hypertension. Mean age was 62.2, and mean follow-up was 4.7 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two blood pressure treatment strategies: intensive (systolic <120 mmHg) or standard (systolic <140 mmHg). Sex-specific quartiles of waist-to-height ratio were used as the measure of central obesity. The primary ACCORD outcome (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or CVD death) and three secondary outcomes (nonfatal MI, fatal or nonfatal stroke, and CVD death) were examined using proportional hazard models. RESULTS: There was no evidence that the effect of intensively lowering blood pressure differed by quartile of waist-to-height ratio for any of the four outcomes (P > 0.25 in all cases). Controlling for waist-to-height quartile had no significant impact on previously published results for intensive blood pressure therapy. Waist-to-height ratio was significantly related to CVD mortality (hazard ratio 2.32 [95% CI 1.40–3.83], P = 0.0009 comparing the heaviest to lightest quartiles), but not to the other outcomes (P > 0.09 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lowering of blood pressure versus standard treatment does not ameliorate CVD risk in individuals with DM and hypertension. These results did not vary by quartile of waist-to-height ratio. American Diabetes Association 2012-07 2012-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3379577/ /pubmed/22723577 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1827 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Barzilay, Joshua I.
Howard, Annie G.
Evans, Gregory W.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Cohen, Robert M.
Booth, Gillian L.
Kimel, Angela R.
Pedley, Carolyn F.
Cushman, William C.
Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title_full Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title_fullStr Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title_short Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Does Not Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Centrally Obese Hypertensive Individuals With Diabetes: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure Trial
title_sort intensive blood pressure treatment does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in centrally obese hypertensive individuals with diabetes: the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (accord) blood pressure trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723577
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1827
work_keys_str_mv AT barzilayjoshuai intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT howardannieg intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT evansgregoryw intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT flegjeromel intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT cohenrobertm intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT boothgillianl intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT kimelangelar intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT pedleycarolynf intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial
AT cushmanwilliamc intensivebloodpressuretreatmentdoesnotimprovecardiovascularoutcomesincentrallyobesehypertensiveindividualswithdiabetestheactiontocontrolcardiovascularriskindiabetesaccordbloodpressuretrial