Cargando…

Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE: To compare the Cambridge contrast sensitivity (CS) test and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in detecting visual impairment in a population of visually symptomatic and asymptomatic patients affected by clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Fifty patients (100 eyes) presenting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shandiz, Javad Heravian, Nourian, Abbas, Hossaini, Mercedeh Bahr, Moghaddam, Hadi Ostadi, yekta, Abbas-Ali, Sharifzadeh, Laleh, Marouzi, Parviz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737353
_version_ 1782236258306621440
author Shandiz, Javad Heravian
Nourian, Abbas
Hossaini, Mercedeh Bahr
Moghaddam, Hadi Ostadi
yekta, Abbas-Ali
Sharifzadeh, Laleh
Marouzi, Parviz
author_facet Shandiz, Javad Heravian
Nourian, Abbas
Hossaini, Mercedeh Bahr
Moghaddam, Hadi Ostadi
yekta, Abbas-Ali
Sharifzadeh, Laleh
Marouzi, Parviz
author_sort Shandiz, Javad Heravian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the Cambridge contrast sensitivity (CS) test and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in detecting visual impairment in a population of visually symptomatic and asymptomatic patients affected by clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Fifty patients (100 eyes) presenting with MS and 25 healthy subjects (50 eyes) with normal corrected visual acuity were included in this study. CS was determined using the Cambridge Low Contrast Grating test and VEP was obtained in all eyes. Findings were evaluated in two age strata of 10–29 and 30–49 years. RESULTS: Of the 42 eyes in the 10–29 year age group, CS was abnormal in 22 (52%), VEP was also abnormal in 22 (52%), but only 12 eyes (28%) had visual symptoms. Of the 58 eyes in the 30–49 year group, CS was abnormal in 7 (12%), VEP was abnormal in 34 (58%), while only 11 eyes were symptomatic. No single test could detect all of the abnormal eyes. CONCLUSION: The Cambridge Low Contrast Grating test is useful for detection of clinical and subclinical visual dysfunction especially in young patients with multiple sclerosis. Nevertheless, only a combination of CS and VEP tests can detect most cases of visual dysfunction associated with MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3379913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33799132012-06-26 Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis Shandiz, Javad Heravian Nourian, Abbas Hossaini, Mercedeh Bahr Moghaddam, Hadi Ostadi yekta, Abbas-Ali Sharifzadeh, Laleh Marouzi, Parviz J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the Cambridge contrast sensitivity (CS) test and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in detecting visual impairment in a population of visually symptomatic and asymptomatic patients affected by clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Fifty patients (100 eyes) presenting with MS and 25 healthy subjects (50 eyes) with normal corrected visual acuity were included in this study. CS was determined using the Cambridge Low Contrast Grating test and VEP was obtained in all eyes. Findings were evaluated in two age strata of 10–29 and 30–49 years. RESULTS: Of the 42 eyes in the 10–29 year age group, CS was abnormal in 22 (52%), VEP was also abnormal in 22 (52%), but only 12 eyes (28%) had visual symptoms. Of the 58 eyes in the 30–49 year group, CS was abnormal in 7 (12%), VEP was abnormal in 34 (58%), while only 11 eyes were symptomatic. No single test could detect all of the abnormal eyes. CONCLUSION: The Cambridge Low Contrast Grating test is useful for detection of clinical and subclinical visual dysfunction especially in young patients with multiple sclerosis. Nevertheless, only a combination of CS and VEP tests can detect most cases of visual dysfunction associated with MS. Ophthalmic Research Center 2010-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3379913/ /pubmed/22737353 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shandiz, Javad Heravian
Nourian, Abbas
Hossaini, Mercedeh Bahr
Moghaddam, Hadi Ostadi
yekta, Abbas-Ali
Sharifzadeh, Laleh
Marouzi, Parviz
Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort contrast sensitivity versus visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737353
work_keys_str_mv AT shandizjavadheravian contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT nourianabbas contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT hossainimercedehbahr contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT moghaddamhadiostadi contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT yektaabbasali contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT sharifzadehlaleh contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis
AT marouziparviz contrastsensitivityversusvisualevokedpotentialsinmultiplesclerosis