Cargando…

Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl

The saliency of visual objects is based on the center to background contrast. Particularly objects differing in one feature from the background may be perceived as more salient. It is not clear to what extent this so called “pop-out” effect observed in humans and primates governs saliency perception...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahar, Yael, Wagner, Hermann, Gutfreund, Yoram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3380014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039559
_version_ 1782236280321474560
author Zahar, Yael
Wagner, Hermann
Gutfreund, Yoram
author_facet Zahar, Yael
Wagner, Hermann
Gutfreund, Yoram
author_sort Zahar, Yael
collection PubMed
description The saliency of visual objects is based on the center to background contrast. Particularly objects differing in one feature from the background may be perceived as more salient. It is not clear to what extent this so called “pop-out” effect observed in humans and primates governs saliency perception in non-primates as well. In this study we searched for neural-correlates of pop-out perception in neurons located in the optic tectum of the barn owl. We measured the responses of tectal neurons to stimuli appearing within the visual receptive field, embedded in a large array of additional stimuli (the background). Responses were compared between contrasting and uniform conditions. In a contrasting condition the center was different from the background while in the uniform condition it was identical to the background. Most tectal neurons responded better to stimuli in the contrsating condition compared to the uniform condition when the contrast between center and background was the direction of motion but not when it was the orientation of a bar. Tectal neurons also preferred contrasting over uniform stimuli when the center was looming and the background receding but not when the center was receding and the background looming. Therefore, our results do not support the hypothesis that tectal neurons are sensitive to pop-out per-se. The specific sensitivity to the motion contrasting stimulus is consistent with the idea that object motion and not large field motion (e.g., self-induced motion) is coded in the neural responses of tectal neurons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3380014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33800142012-06-28 Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl Zahar, Yael Wagner, Hermann Gutfreund, Yoram PLoS One Research Article The saliency of visual objects is based on the center to background contrast. Particularly objects differing in one feature from the background may be perceived as more salient. It is not clear to what extent this so called “pop-out” effect observed in humans and primates governs saliency perception in non-primates as well. In this study we searched for neural-correlates of pop-out perception in neurons located in the optic tectum of the barn owl. We measured the responses of tectal neurons to stimuli appearing within the visual receptive field, embedded in a large array of additional stimuli (the background). Responses were compared between contrasting and uniform conditions. In a contrasting condition the center was different from the background while in the uniform condition it was identical to the background. Most tectal neurons responded better to stimuli in the contrsating condition compared to the uniform condition when the contrast between center and background was the direction of motion but not when it was the orientation of a bar. Tectal neurons also preferred contrasting over uniform stimuli when the center was looming and the background receding but not when the center was receding and the background looming. Therefore, our results do not support the hypothesis that tectal neurons are sensitive to pop-out per-se. The specific sensitivity to the motion contrasting stimulus is consistent with the idea that object motion and not large field motion (e.g., self-induced motion) is coded in the neural responses of tectal neurons. Public Library of Science 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3380014/ /pubmed/22745787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039559 Text en Zahar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zahar, Yael
Wagner, Hermann
Gutfreund, Yoram
Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title_full Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title_fullStr Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title_full_unstemmed Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title_short Responses of Tectal Neurons to Contrasting Stimuli: An Electrophysiological Study in the Barn Owl
title_sort responses of tectal neurons to contrasting stimuli: an electrophysiological study in the barn owl
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3380014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039559
work_keys_str_mv AT zaharyael responsesoftectalneuronstocontrastingstimulianelectrophysiologicalstudyinthebarnowl
AT wagnerhermann responsesoftectalneuronstocontrastingstimulianelectrophysiologicalstudyinthebarnowl
AT gutfreundyoram responsesoftectalneuronstocontrastingstimulianelectrophysiologicalstudyinthebarnowl