Cargando…

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery

PURPOSE: To report refractive outcomes following phacoemulsification (PE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 18 consecutive eyes of 14 patients with previous keratorefractive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javadi, Mohammad-Ali, Feizi, Sepehr, Malekifar, Parviz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737381
_version_ 1782236369715724288
author Javadi, Mohammad-Ali
Feizi, Sepehr
Malekifar, Parviz
author_facet Javadi, Mohammad-Ali
Feizi, Sepehr
Malekifar, Parviz
author_sort Javadi, Mohammad-Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report refractive outcomes following phacoemulsification (PE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 18 consecutive eyes of 14 patients with previous keratorefractive surgery for myopia including photorefractive keratectomy (PRK, 6 eyes; 33.3%) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK, 12 eyes; 66.7%) underwent PE+PCIOL. Computerized corneal topography was employed to determine the flattest keratometric reading within the 3-mm central zone. This value was inserted into the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T (SRK/T) formula to calculate IOL power. IOL power selected for implantation was 1 D greater than the calculated value described above. RESULTS: Mean age and follow-up period were 54.1±11.5 years and 29.9±26.3 months, respectively. Mean implanted lens power was 18.56±3.86 D which was not significantly different from mean back-calculated IOL power for target refraction (19.04±4.16 D) (P=0.28). There was no significant difference between mean target refraction (−0.94±0.52 D) and achieved postoperative spherical equivalent refractive error (−0.62±1.06) at final follow-up (P=0.28). The achieved spherical equivalent refractive error was within ±0.50 D of intended refraction in 8 (44.4%) eyes, within ±1.0 D in 11 (61.1%) eyes, and within ±2.0 D in 16 (88.9%) eyes. In a subgroup of patients (5 eyes) with complete pre-refractive surgery data, the difference between post-refractive surgery keratometry method and all other methods (P=0.02) and between the current method and the Feiz-Mannis method (P=0.01) was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The method suggested herein is simple and independent of pre-refractive surgery data with results comparable to other commonly used methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3381097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33810972012-06-26 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery Javadi, Mohammad-Ali Feizi, Sepehr Malekifar, Parviz J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To report refractive outcomes following phacoemulsification (PE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 18 consecutive eyes of 14 patients with previous keratorefractive surgery for myopia including photorefractive keratectomy (PRK, 6 eyes; 33.3%) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK, 12 eyes; 66.7%) underwent PE+PCIOL. Computerized corneal topography was employed to determine the flattest keratometric reading within the 3-mm central zone. This value was inserted into the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/T (SRK/T) formula to calculate IOL power. IOL power selected for implantation was 1 D greater than the calculated value described above. RESULTS: Mean age and follow-up period were 54.1±11.5 years and 29.9±26.3 months, respectively. Mean implanted lens power was 18.56±3.86 D which was not significantly different from mean back-calculated IOL power for target refraction (19.04±4.16 D) (P=0.28). There was no significant difference between mean target refraction (−0.94±0.52 D) and achieved postoperative spherical equivalent refractive error (−0.62±1.06) at final follow-up (P=0.28). The achieved spherical equivalent refractive error was within ±0.50 D of intended refraction in 8 (44.4%) eyes, within ±1.0 D in 11 (61.1%) eyes, and within ±2.0 D in 16 (88.9%) eyes. In a subgroup of patients (5 eyes) with complete pre-refractive surgery data, the difference between post-refractive surgery keratometry method and all other methods (P=0.02) and between the current method and the Feiz-Mannis method (P=0.01) was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The method suggested herein is simple and independent of pre-refractive surgery data with results comparable to other commonly used methods. Ophthalmic Research Center 2012-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3381097/ /pubmed/22737381 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Javadi, Mohammad-Ali
Feizi, Sepehr
Malekifar, Parviz
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title_full Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title_fullStr Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title_short Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Corneal Refractive Surgery
title_sort intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737381
work_keys_str_mv AT javadimohammadali intraocularlenspowercalculationaftercornealrefractivesurgery
AT feizisepehr intraocularlenspowercalculationaftercornealrefractivesurgery
AT malekifarparviz intraocularlenspowercalculationaftercornealrefractivesurgery