Cargando…
Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer
BACKGROUND: The new 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control–American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC-AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is the ratification of data-driven recommendations from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Generalizability r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2218-5 |
_version_ | 1782236374852698112 |
---|---|
author | Talsma, Koen van Hagen, Pieter Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Tilanus, Hugo W. van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. |
author_facet | Talsma, Koen van Hagen, Pieter Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Tilanus, Hugo W. van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. |
author_sort | Talsma, Koen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The new 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control–American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC-AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is the ratification of data-driven recommendations from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Generalizability remains questionable for single institutions. The present study serves as a validation of the 7th edition of the TNM system in a prospective cohort of patients with predominantly adenocarcinomas from a single institution. METHODS: Included were patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent between 1991 and 2008 for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, patients after a noncurative resection and patients who died in the hospital. Tumors were staged according to both the 6th and the 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC staging systems. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. The likelihood ratio chi-square test related to the Cox regression model and the Akaike information criterion were used for measuring goodness of fit. RESULTS: A study population of 358 patients was identified. All patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. Univariate analysis revealed that pT stage, pN stage, and pM stage significantly predicted overall survival. Prediction was best for the 7th edition, stratifying for all substages. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the 7th UICC-AJCC staging system results in a better prognostic stratification of overall survival compared to the 6th edition. The fact that the 7th edition performs better predominantly in patients with adenocarcinomas who underwent a transhiatal surgical approach, in addition to findings from earlier research in other cohorts, supports its generalizability for different esophageal cancer practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3381120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33811202012-07-05 Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer Talsma, Koen van Hagen, Pieter Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Tilanus, Hugo W. van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: The new 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control–American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC-AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is the ratification of data-driven recommendations from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Generalizability remains questionable for single institutions. The present study serves as a validation of the 7th edition of the TNM system in a prospective cohort of patients with predominantly adenocarcinomas from a single institution. METHODS: Included were patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent between 1991 and 2008 for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, patients after a noncurative resection and patients who died in the hospital. Tumors were staged according to both the 6th and the 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC staging systems. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox regression model. The likelihood ratio chi-square test related to the Cox regression model and the Akaike information criterion were used for measuring goodness of fit. RESULTS: A study population of 358 patients was identified. All patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Overall 5-year survival rate was 38%. Univariate analysis revealed that pT stage, pN stage, and pM stage significantly predicted overall survival. Prediction was best for the 7th edition, stratifying for all substages. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the 7th UICC-AJCC staging system results in a better prognostic stratification of overall survival compared to the 6th edition. The fact that the 7th edition performs better predominantly in patients with adenocarcinomas who underwent a transhiatal surgical approach, in addition to findings from earlier research in other cohorts, supports its generalizability for different esophageal cancer practices. Springer-Verlag 2012-03-07 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3381120/ /pubmed/22395974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2218-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Thoracic Oncology Talsma, Koen van Hagen, Pieter Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Tilanus, Hugo W. van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title | Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the uicc-ajcc tnm classification for esophageal cancer |
topic | Thoracic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2218-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talsmakoen comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT vanhagenpieter comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT grotenhuisbrechtjea comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT steyerbergewoutw comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT tilanushugow comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT vanlanschotjanjb comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer AT wijnhovenbaspl comparisonofthe6thand7theditionsoftheuiccajcctnmclassificationforesophagealcancer |