Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core

PURPOSE: Debonding of a composite resin core of the fiber post often occurs at the interface between these two materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber posts and composite core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosharraf, Ramin, Baghaei Yazdi, Najmeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737316
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.103
_version_ 1782236375750279168
author Mosharraf, Ramin
Baghaei Yazdi, Najmeh
author_facet Mosharraf, Ramin
Baghaei Yazdi, Najmeh
author_sort Mosharraf, Ramin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Debonding of a composite resin core of the fiber post often occurs at the interface between these two materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber posts and composite core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four fiber posts were picked in two groups (Hetco and Exacto). Each group was further divided into four subgroups using different surface treatments: 1) silanization; 2) sandblasting; 3) Treatment with 24% H(2)O(2), and 4) no treatment (control group). A cylindrical plexiglass matrix was placed around the post and filled with the core resin composite. Specimens were stored in 5000 thermal cycles between 5℃ and 55℃. Tensile bond strength (TBS) test and evaluation using stereomicroscope were performed on the specimen and the data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Post Hoc Scheffe tests and Fisher's Exact Test (α=.05). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the effect of different surface treatments on TBS (P<.001) but different brands of post (P=.743) and interaction between the brand of post and surface treatment (P=.922) had no significant effect on TBS. Both silanization and sandblasting improved the bonding strength of fiber posts to composite resin core, but there were not any significant differences between these groups and control group. CONCLUSION: There was not any significant difference between two brands of fiber posts that had been used in this study. Although silanization and sandblasting can improve the TBS, there was not any significant differences between surface treatments used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3381201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33812012012-06-26 Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core Mosharraf, Ramin Baghaei Yazdi, Najmeh J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Debonding of a composite resin core of the fiber post often occurs at the interface between these two materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber posts and composite core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four fiber posts were picked in two groups (Hetco and Exacto). Each group was further divided into four subgroups using different surface treatments: 1) silanization; 2) sandblasting; 3) Treatment with 24% H(2)O(2), and 4) no treatment (control group). A cylindrical plexiglass matrix was placed around the post and filled with the core resin composite. Specimens were stored in 5000 thermal cycles between 5℃ and 55℃. Tensile bond strength (TBS) test and evaluation using stereomicroscope were performed on the specimen and the data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Post Hoc Scheffe tests and Fisher's Exact Test (α=.05). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the effect of different surface treatments on TBS (P<.001) but different brands of post (P=.743) and interaction between the brand of post and surface treatment (P=.922) had no significant effect on TBS. Both silanization and sandblasting improved the bonding strength of fiber posts to composite resin core, but there were not any significant differences between these groups and control group. CONCLUSION: There was not any significant difference between two brands of fiber posts that had been used in this study. Although silanization and sandblasting can improve the TBS, there was not any significant differences between surface treatments used. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-05 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3381201/ /pubmed/22737316 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.103 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mosharraf, Ramin
Baghaei Yazdi, Najmeh
Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title_full Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title_short Comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
title_sort comparative evaluation of effects of different surface treatment methods on bond strength between fiber post and composite core
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3381201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22737316
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.103
work_keys_str_mv AT mosharraframin comparativeevaluationofeffectsofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonbondstrengthbetweenfiberpostandcompositecore
AT baghaeiyazdinajmeh comparativeevaluationofeffectsofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonbondstrengthbetweenfiberpostandcompositecore