Cargando…
Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21947249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y |
_version_ | 1782236480860585984 |
---|---|
author | Berg, Linda Neckelmann, Gesche Gjertsen, Øivind Hellum, Christian Johnsen, Lars G. Eide, Geir E. Espeland, Ansgar |
author_facet | Berg, Linda Neckelmann, Gesche Gjertsen, Øivind Hellum, Christian Johnsen, Lars G. Eide, Geir E. Espeland, Ansgar |
author_sort | Berg, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc prosthesis. METHODS: On pretreatment MRI of 170 patients (mean age 41 years; 88 women), three experienced radiologists independently rated Modic changes, disc findings and facet arthropathy at L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Two radiologists rerated 126 examinations. For each MRI finding at each disc level, agreement was analysed using the kappa statistic and differences in prevalence across observers using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: All findings at L3/L4 and facet arthropathy at L5/S1 had a mean prevalence <10% across observers and were not further analysed, ensuring interpretable kappa values. Overall interobserver agreement was generally moderate or good (kappa 0.40–0.77) at L4–S1 for Modic changes, nucleus pulposus signal, disc height (subjective and measured), posterior high-intensity zone (HIZ) and disc contour, and fair (kappa 0.24) at L4/L5 for facet arthropathy. Posterior HIZ at L5/S1 and severely reduced subjective disc height at L4/L5 differed up to threefold in prevalence between observers (p < 0.0001). Intraobserver agreement was mostly good or very good (kappa 0.60–1.00). CONCLUSION: In candidates for disc prosthesis, mostly moderate interobserver agreement is expected for localised MRI findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3382271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33822712012-07-05 Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis Berg, Linda Neckelmann, Gesche Gjertsen, Øivind Hellum, Christian Johnsen, Lars G. Eide, Geir E. Espeland, Ansgar Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc prosthesis. METHODS: On pretreatment MRI of 170 patients (mean age 41 years; 88 women), three experienced radiologists independently rated Modic changes, disc findings and facet arthropathy at L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Two radiologists rerated 126 examinations. For each MRI finding at each disc level, agreement was analysed using the kappa statistic and differences in prevalence across observers using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: All findings at L3/L4 and facet arthropathy at L5/S1 had a mean prevalence <10% across observers and were not further analysed, ensuring interpretable kappa values. Overall interobserver agreement was generally moderate or good (kappa 0.40–0.77) at L4–S1 for Modic changes, nucleus pulposus signal, disc height (subjective and measured), posterior high-intensity zone (HIZ) and disc contour, and fair (kappa 0.24) at L4/L5 for facet arthropathy. Posterior HIZ at L5/S1 and severely reduced subjective disc height at L4/L5 differed up to threefold in prevalence between observers (p < 0.0001). Intraobserver agreement was mostly good or very good (kappa 0.60–1.00). CONCLUSION: In candidates for disc prosthesis, mostly moderate interobserver agreement is expected for localised MRI findings. Springer-Verlag 2011-09-23 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3382271/ /pubmed/21947249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostic Neuroradiology Berg, Linda Neckelmann, Gesche Gjertsen, Øivind Hellum, Christian Johnsen, Lars G. Eide, Geir E. Espeland, Ansgar Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title | Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title_full | Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title_fullStr | Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title_short | Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
title_sort | reliability of mri findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis |
topic | Diagnostic Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21947249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berglinda reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT neckelmanngesche reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT gjertsenøivind reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT hellumchristian reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT johnsenlarsg reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT eidegeire reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis AT espelandansgar reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis |