Cargando…

Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis

INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berg, Linda, Neckelmann, Gesche, Gjertsen, Øivind, Hellum, Christian, Johnsen, Lars G., Eide, Geir E., Espeland, Ansgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21947249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y
_version_ 1782236480860585984
author Berg, Linda
Neckelmann, Gesche
Gjertsen, Øivind
Hellum, Christian
Johnsen, Lars G.
Eide, Geir E.
Espeland, Ansgar
author_facet Berg, Linda
Neckelmann, Gesche
Gjertsen, Øivind
Hellum, Christian
Johnsen, Lars G.
Eide, Geir E.
Espeland, Ansgar
author_sort Berg, Linda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc prosthesis. METHODS: On pretreatment MRI of 170 patients (mean age 41 years; 88 women), three experienced radiologists independently rated Modic changes, disc findings and facet arthropathy at L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Two radiologists rerated 126 examinations. For each MRI finding at each disc level, agreement was analysed using the kappa statistic and differences in prevalence across observers using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: All findings at L3/L4 and facet arthropathy at L5/S1 had a mean prevalence <10% across observers and were not further analysed, ensuring interpretable kappa values. Overall interobserver agreement was generally moderate or good (kappa 0.40–0.77) at L4–S1 for Modic changes, nucleus pulposus signal, disc height (subjective and measured), posterior high-intensity zone (HIZ) and disc contour, and fair (kappa 0.24) at L4/L5 for facet arthropathy. Posterior HIZ at L5/S1 and severely reduced subjective disc height at L4/L5 differed up to threefold in prevalence between observers (p < 0.0001). Intraobserver agreement was mostly good or very good (kappa 0.60–1.00). CONCLUSION: In candidates for disc prosthesis, mostly moderate interobserver agreement is expected for localised MRI findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3382271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33822712012-07-05 Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis Berg, Linda Neckelmann, Gesche Gjertsen, Øivind Hellum, Christian Johnsen, Lars G. Eide, Geir E. Espeland, Ansgar Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Limited reliability data exist for localised magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings relevant to planning of treatment with lumbar disc prosthesis and later outcomes. We assessed the reliability of such findings in chronic low back pain patients who were accepted candidates for disc prosthesis. METHODS: On pretreatment MRI of 170 patients (mean age 41 years; 88 women), three experienced radiologists independently rated Modic changes, disc findings and facet arthropathy at L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1. Two radiologists rerated 126 examinations. For each MRI finding at each disc level, agreement was analysed using the kappa statistic and differences in prevalence across observers using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: All findings at L3/L4 and facet arthropathy at L5/S1 had a mean prevalence <10% across observers and were not further analysed, ensuring interpretable kappa values. Overall interobserver agreement was generally moderate or good (kappa 0.40–0.77) at L4–S1 for Modic changes, nucleus pulposus signal, disc height (subjective and measured), posterior high-intensity zone (HIZ) and disc contour, and fair (kappa 0.24) at L4/L5 for facet arthropathy. Posterior HIZ at L5/S1 and severely reduced subjective disc height at L4/L5 differed up to threefold in prevalence between observers (p < 0.0001). Intraobserver agreement was mostly good or very good (kappa 0.60–1.00). CONCLUSION: In candidates for disc prosthesis, mostly moderate interobserver agreement is expected for localised MRI findings. Springer-Verlag 2011-09-23 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3382271/ /pubmed/21947249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Diagnostic Neuroradiology
Berg, Linda
Neckelmann, Gesche
Gjertsen, Øivind
Hellum, Christian
Johnsen, Lars G.
Eide, Geir E.
Espeland, Ansgar
Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title_full Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title_fullStr Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title_short Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
title_sort reliability of mri findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
topic Diagnostic Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21947249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y
work_keys_str_mv AT berglinda reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT neckelmanngesche reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT gjertsenøivind reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT hellumchristian reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT johnsenlarsg reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT eidegeire reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis
AT espelandansgar reliabilityofmrifindingsincandidatesforlumbardiscprosthesis