Cargando…

Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions

BACKGROUND: Although the management of sarcoma is improving, non adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) remains high, mainly because of the low incidence of the disease and the variety of histological subtypes. Since little is known about the health economics of sarcoma, we undertook a cos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perrier, Lionel, Buja, Alessandra, Mastrangelo, Giuseppe, Vecchiato, Antonella, Sandonà, Paolo, Ducimetière, Françoise, Blay, Jean-Yves, Gilly, François Noël, Siani, Carole, Biron, Pierre, Ranchère-Vince, Dominique, Decouvelaere, Anne-Valérie, Thiesse, Philippe, Bergeron, Christophe, Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo, Coindre, Jean-Michel, Rossi, Carlo Riccardo, Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22455759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-82
_version_ 1782236496079618048
author Perrier, Lionel
Buja, Alessandra
Mastrangelo, Giuseppe
Vecchiato, Antonella
Sandonà, Paolo
Ducimetière, Françoise
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gilly, François Noël
Siani, Carole
Biron, Pierre
Ranchère-Vince, Dominique
Decouvelaere, Anne-Valérie
Thiesse, Philippe
Bergeron, Christophe
Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo
Coindre, Jean-Michel
Rossi, Carlo Riccardo
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
author_facet Perrier, Lionel
Buja, Alessandra
Mastrangelo, Giuseppe
Vecchiato, Antonella
Sandonà, Paolo
Ducimetière, Françoise
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gilly, François Noël
Siani, Carole
Biron, Pierre
Ranchère-Vince, Dominique
Decouvelaere, Anne-Valérie
Thiesse, Philippe
Bergeron, Christophe
Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo
Coindre, Jean-Michel
Rossi, Carlo Riccardo
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
author_sort Perrier, Lionel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the management of sarcoma is improving, non adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) remains high, mainly because of the low incidence of the disease and the variety of histological subtypes. Since little is known about the health economics of sarcoma, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis (within the CONnective TIssue CAncer NETwork, CONTICANET) comparing costs and outcomes when clinicians adhered to CPGs and when they did not. METHODS: Patients studied had a histological diagnosis of sarcoma, were older than 15 years, and had been treated in the Rhône-Alpes region of France (in 2005/2006) or in the Veneto region of Italy (in 2007). Data collected retrospectively for the three years after diagnosis were used to determine relapse free survival and health costs (adopting the hospital's perspective and a microcosting approach). All costs were expressed in euros (€) at their 2009 value. A 4% annual discount rate was applied to both costs and effects. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as cost per relapse-free year gained when management was compliant with CPGs compared with when it was not. To capture uncertainty surrounding ICER, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed based on a non-parametric bootstrap method. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were included in the study. Compliance with CPGs was observed for 118 patients (54%). Average total costs reached 23,571 euros when treatment was in accordance with CPGs and 27,313 euros when it was not. In relation to relapse-free survival, compliance with CPGs strictly dominates non compliance, i.e. it is both less costly and more effective. Taking uncertainty into account, the probability that compliance with CPGs still strictly dominates was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings should encourage physicians to increase their compliance with CPGs and healthcare administrators to invest in the implementation of CPGs in the management of sarcoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3382421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33824212012-06-26 Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions Perrier, Lionel Buja, Alessandra Mastrangelo, Giuseppe Vecchiato, Antonella Sandonà, Paolo Ducimetière, Françoise Blay, Jean-Yves Gilly, François Noël Siani, Carole Biron, Pierre Ranchère-Vince, Dominique Decouvelaere, Anne-Valérie Thiesse, Philippe Bergeron, Christophe Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo Coindre, Jean-Michel Rossi, Carlo Riccardo Ray-Coquard, Isabelle BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the management of sarcoma is improving, non adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) remains high, mainly because of the low incidence of the disease and the variety of histological subtypes. Since little is known about the health economics of sarcoma, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis (within the CONnective TIssue CAncer NETwork, CONTICANET) comparing costs and outcomes when clinicians adhered to CPGs and when they did not. METHODS: Patients studied had a histological diagnosis of sarcoma, were older than 15 years, and had been treated in the Rhône-Alpes region of France (in 2005/2006) or in the Veneto region of Italy (in 2007). Data collected retrospectively for the three years after diagnosis were used to determine relapse free survival and health costs (adopting the hospital's perspective and a microcosting approach). All costs were expressed in euros (€) at their 2009 value. A 4% annual discount rate was applied to both costs and effects. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as cost per relapse-free year gained when management was compliant with CPGs compared with when it was not. To capture uncertainty surrounding ICER, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed based on a non-parametric bootstrap method. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were included in the study. Compliance with CPGs was observed for 118 patients (54%). Average total costs reached 23,571 euros when treatment was in accordance with CPGs and 27,313 euros when it was not. In relation to relapse-free survival, compliance with CPGs strictly dominates non compliance, i.e. it is both less costly and more effective. Taking uncertainty into account, the probability that compliance with CPGs still strictly dominates was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings should encourage physicians to increase their compliance with CPGs and healthcare administrators to invest in the implementation of CPGs in the management of sarcoma. BioMed Central 2012-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3382421/ /pubmed/22455759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-82 Text en Copyright ©2012 Perrier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perrier, Lionel
Buja, Alessandra
Mastrangelo, Giuseppe
Vecchiato, Antonella
Sandonà, Paolo
Ducimetière, Françoise
Blay, Jean-Yves
Gilly, François Noël
Siani, Carole
Biron, Pierre
Ranchère-Vince, Dominique
Decouvelaere, Anne-Valérie
Thiesse, Philippe
Bergeron, Christophe
Dei Tos, Angelo Paolo
Coindre, Jean-Michel
Rossi, Carlo Riccardo
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title_full Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title_fullStr Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title_full_unstemmed Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title_short Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions
title_sort clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two european regions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22455759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-82
work_keys_str_mv AT perrierlionel cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT bujaalessandra cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT mastrangelogiuseppe cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT vecchiatoantonella cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT sandonapaolo cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT ducimetierefrancoise cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT blayjeanyves cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT gillyfrancoisnoel cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT sianicarole cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT bironpierre cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT rancherevincedominique cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT decouvelaereannevalerie cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT thiessephilippe cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT bergeronchristophe cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT deitosangelopaolo cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT coindrejeanmichel cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT rossicarloriccardo cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions
AT raycoquardisabelle cliniciansadherenceversusnonadherencetopracticeguidelinesinthemanagementofpatientswithsarcomaacosteffectivenessassessmentintwoeuropeanregions