Cargando…
Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology
Methods of diagrammatic modelling have been greatly developed in the past two decades. Outside the context of infectious diseases, systematic use of diagrams in epidemiology has been mainly confined to the analysis of a single link: that between a disease outcome and its proximal determinant(s). Tra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-9-1 |
_version_ | 1782236497466884096 |
---|---|
author | Joffe, Michael Gambhir, Manoj Chadeau-Hyam, Marc Vineis, Paolo |
author_facet | Joffe, Michael Gambhir, Manoj Chadeau-Hyam, Marc Vineis, Paolo |
author_sort | Joffe, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Methods of diagrammatic modelling have been greatly developed in the past two decades. Outside the context of infectious diseases, systematic use of diagrams in epidemiology has been mainly confined to the analysis of a single link: that between a disease outcome and its proximal determinant(s). Transmitted causes ("causes of causes") tend not to be systematically analysed. The infectious disease epidemiology modelling tradition models the human population in its environment, typically with the exposure-health relationship and the determinants of exposure being considered at individual and group/ecological levels, respectively. Some properties of the resulting systems are quite general, and are seen in unrelated contexts such as biochemical pathways. Confining analysis to a single link misses the opportunity to discover such properties. The structure of a causal diagram is derived from knowledge about how the world works, as well as from statistical evidence. A single diagram can be used to characterise a whole research area, not just a single analysis - although this depends on the degree of consistency of the causal relationships between different populations - and can therefore be used to integrate multiple datasets. Additional advantages of system-wide models include: the use of instrumental variables - now emerging as an important technique in epidemiology in the context of mendelian randomisation, but under-used in the exploitation of "natural experiments"; the explicit use of change models, which have advantages with respect to inferring causation; and in the detection and elucidation of feedback. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3382427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33824272012-06-26 Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology Joffe, Michael Gambhir, Manoj Chadeau-Hyam, Marc Vineis, Paolo Emerg Themes Epidemiol Analytic Perspective Methods of diagrammatic modelling have been greatly developed in the past two decades. Outside the context of infectious diseases, systematic use of diagrams in epidemiology has been mainly confined to the analysis of a single link: that between a disease outcome and its proximal determinant(s). Transmitted causes ("causes of causes") tend not to be systematically analysed. The infectious disease epidemiology modelling tradition models the human population in its environment, typically with the exposure-health relationship and the determinants of exposure being considered at individual and group/ecological levels, respectively. Some properties of the resulting systems are quite general, and are seen in unrelated contexts such as biochemical pathways. Confining analysis to a single link misses the opportunity to discover such properties. The structure of a causal diagram is derived from knowledge about how the world works, as well as from statistical evidence. A single diagram can be used to characterise a whole research area, not just a single analysis - although this depends on the degree of consistency of the causal relationships between different populations - and can therefore be used to integrate multiple datasets. Additional advantages of system-wide models include: the use of instrumental variables - now emerging as an important technique in epidemiology in the context of mendelian randomisation, but under-used in the exploitation of "natural experiments"; the explicit use of change models, which have advantages with respect to inferring causation; and in the detection and elucidation of feedback. BioMed Central 2012-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3382427/ /pubmed/22429606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-9-1 Text en Copyright ©2012 Joffe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Analytic Perspective Joffe, Michael Gambhir, Manoj Chadeau-Hyam, Marc Vineis, Paolo Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title | Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title_full | Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title_fullStr | Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title_short | Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
title_sort | causal diagrams in systems epidemiology |
topic | Analytic Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-9-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joffemichael causaldiagramsinsystemsepidemiology AT gambhirmanoj causaldiagramsinsystemsepidemiology AT chadeauhyammarc causaldiagramsinsystemsepidemiology AT vineispaolo causaldiagramsinsystemsepidemiology |