Cargando…

Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become increasingly popular for sampling hidden populations, including injecting drug users (IDU). However, RDS data are unique and require specialized analysis techniques, many of which remain underdeveloped. RDS sample size estimation requires knowing design ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wejnert, Cyprian, Pham, Huong, Krishna, Nevin, Le, Binh, DiNenno, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0147-8
_version_ 1782236523424382976
author Wejnert, Cyprian
Pham, Huong
Krishna, Nevin
Le, Binh
DiNenno, Elizabeth
author_facet Wejnert, Cyprian
Pham, Huong
Krishna, Nevin
Le, Binh
DiNenno, Elizabeth
author_sort Wejnert, Cyprian
collection PubMed
description Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become increasingly popular for sampling hidden populations, including injecting drug users (IDU). However, RDS data are unique and require specialized analysis techniques, many of which remain underdeveloped. RDS sample size estimation requires knowing design effect (DE), which can only be calculated post hoc. Few studies have analyzed RDS DE using real world empirical data. We analyze estimated DE from 43 samples of IDU collected using a standardized protocol. We find the previous recommendation that sample size be at least doubled, consistent with DE = 2, underestimates true DE and recommend researchers use DE = 4 as an alternate estimate when calculating sample size. A formula for calculating sample size for RDS studies among IDU is presented. Researchers faced with limited resources may wish to accept slightly higher standard errors to keep sample size requirements low. Our results highlight dangers of ignoring sampling design in analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3382647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33826472012-07-05 Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States Wejnert, Cyprian Pham, Huong Krishna, Nevin Le, Binh DiNenno, Elizabeth AIDS Behav Original Paper Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become increasingly popular for sampling hidden populations, including injecting drug users (IDU). However, RDS data are unique and require specialized analysis techniques, many of which remain underdeveloped. RDS sample size estimation requires knowing design effect (DE), which can only be calculated post hoc. Few studies have analyzed RDS DE using real world empirical data. We analyze estimated DE from 43 samples of IDU collected using a standardized protocol. We find the previous recommendation that sample size be at least doubled, consistent with DE = 2, underestimates true DE and recommend researchers use DE = 4 as an alternate estimate when calculating sample size. A formula for calculating sample size for RDS studies among IDU is presented. Researchers faced with limited resources may wish to accept slightly higher standard errors to keep sample size requirements low. Our results highlight dangers of ignoring sampling design in analysis. Springer US 2012-02-15 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3382647/ /pubmed/22350828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0147-8 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2012
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wejnert, Cyprian
Pham, Huong
Krishna, Nevin
Le, Binh
DiNenno, Elizabeth
Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title_full Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title_fullStr Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title_short Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
title_sort estimating design effect and calculating sample size for respondent-driven sampling studies of injection drug users in the united states
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0147-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wejnertcyprian estimatingdesigneffectandcalculatingsamplesizeforrespondentdrivensamplingstudiesofinjectiondrugusersintheunitedstates
AT phamhuong estimatingdesigneffectandcalculatingsamplesizeforrespondentdrivensamplingstudiesofinjectiondrugusersintheunitedstates
AT krishnanevin estimatingdesigneffectandcalculatingsamplesizeforrespondentdrivensamplingstudiesofinjectiondrugusersintheunitedstates
AT lebinh estimatingdesigneffectandcalculatingsamplesizeforrespondentdrivensamplingstudiesofinjectiondrugusersintheunitedstates
AT dinennoelizabeth estimatingdesigneffectandcalculatingsamplesizeforrespondentdrivensamplingstudiesofinjectiondrugusersintheunitedstates