Cargando…
The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945 |
_version_ | 1782236536948916224 |
---|---|
author | Cantor, James M. |
author_facet | Cantor, James M. |
author_sort | Cantor, James M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3382737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33827372012-06-26 The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality Cantor, James M. Int J Forensic Ment Health Commentary In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods. Taylor & Francis 2012-04-11 2012-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3382737/ /pubmed/22745581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945 Text en Copyright © International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Cantor, James M. The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title | The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title_full | The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title_fullStr | The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title_full_unstemmed | The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title_short | The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality |
title_sort | errors of karen franklin's pretextuality |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cantorjamesm theerrorsofkarenfranklinspretextuality AT cantorjamesm errorsofkarenfranklinspretextuality |