Cargando…

The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality

In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cantor, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945
_version_ 1782236536948916224
author Cantor, James M.
author_facet Cantor, James M.
author_sort Cantor, James M.
collection PubMed
description In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3382737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33827372012-06-26 The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality Cantor, James M. Int J Forensic Ment Health Commentary In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods. Taylor & Francis 2012-04-11 2012-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3382737/ /pubmed/22745581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945 Text en Copyright © International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Cantor, James M.
The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title_full The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title_fullStr The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title_full_unstemmed The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title_short The Errors of Karen Franklin's Pretextuality
title_sort errors of karen franklin's pretextuality
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.672945
work_keys_str_mv AT cantorjamesm theerrorsofkarenfranklinspretextuality
AT cantorjamesm errorsofkarenfranklinspretextuality