Cargando…

Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework

The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then ess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weitz, Sebastian, Blanco, Stéphane, Fournier, Richard, Gautrais, Jacques, Jost, Christian, Theraulaz, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038588
_version_ 1782236637998088192
author Weitz, Sebastian
Blanco, Stéphane
Fournier, Richard
Gautrais, Jacques
Jost, Christian
Theraulaz, Guy
author_facet Weitz, Sebastian
Blanco, Stéphane
Fournier, Richard
Gautrais, Jacques
Jost, Christian
Theraulaz, Guy
author_sort Weitz, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then essentially to demonstrate that the observed collective features may be the result of self-organizing processes involving quite simple individual behaviors. Other studies concentrate on the objective of establishing or enriching links between collective behavior researches and cognitive or physiological ones, which then requires that each individual rule be carefully validated. Here we discuss the methodological consequences of this additional requirement. Using the example of corpse clustering in ants, we first illustrate that it may be impossible to discriminate among alternative individual rules by considering only observational data collected at the group level. Six individual behavioral models are described: They are clearly distinct in terms of individual behaviors, they all reproduce satisfactorily the collective dynamics and distribution patterns observed in experiments, and we show theoretically that it is strictly impossible to discriminate two of these models even in the limit of an infinite amount of data whatever the accuracy level. A set of methodological steps are then listed and discussed as practical ways to partially overcome this problem. They involve complementary experimental protocols specifically designed to address the behavioral rules successively, conserving group-level data for the overall model validation. In this context, we highlight the importance of maintaining a sharp distinction between model enunciation, with explicit references to validated biological concepts, and formal translation of these concepts in terms of quantitative state variables and fittable functional dependences. Illustrative examples are provided of the benefits expected during the often long and difficult process of refining a behavioral model, designing adapted experimental protocols and inversing model parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3383699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33836992012-07-03 Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework Weitz, Sebastian Blanco, Stéphane Fournier, Richard Gautrais, Jacques Jost, Christian Theraulaz, Guy PLoS One Research Article The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then essentially to demonstrate that the observed collective features may be the result of self-organizing processes involving quite simple individual behaviors. Other studies concentrate on the objective of establishing or enriching links between collective behavior researches and cognitive or physiological ones, which then requires that each individual rule be carefully validated. Here we discuss the methodological consequences of this additional requirement. Using the example of corpse clustering in ants, we first illustrate that it may be impossible to discriminate among alternative individual rules by considering only observational data collected at the group level. Six individual behavioral models are described: They are clearly distinct in terms of individual behaviors, they all reproduce satisfactorily the collective dynamics and distribution patterns observed in experiments, and we show theoretically that it is strictly impossible to discriminate two of these models even in the limit of an infinite amount of data whatever the accuracy level. A set of methodological steps are then listed and discussed as practical ways to partially overcome this problem. They involve complementary experimental protocols specifically designed to address the behavioral rules successively, conserving group-level data for the overall model validation. In this context, we highlight the importance of maintaining a sharp distinction between model enunciation, with explicit references to validated biological concepts, and formal translation of these concepts in terms of quantitative state variables and fittable functional dependences. Illustrative examples are provided of the benefits expected during the often long and difficult process of refining a behavioral model, designing adapted experimental protocols and inversing model parameters. Public Library of Science 2012-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3383699/ /pubmed/22761685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038588 Text en Weitz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weitz, Sebastian
Blanco, Stéphane
Fournier, Richard
Gautrais, Jacques
Jost, Christian
Theraulaz, Guy
Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title_full Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title_fullStr Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title_short Modeling Collective Animal Behavior with a Cognitive Perspective: A Methodological Framework
title_sort modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038588
work_keys_str_mv AT weitzsebastian modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT blancostephane modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT fournierrichard modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT gautraisjacques modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT jostchristian modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework
AT theraulazguy modelingcollectiveanimalbehaviorwithacognitiveperspectiveamethodologicalframework