Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To assess time trends in socioeconomic inequalities in overall and cause-specific stillbirth rates in England. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective study. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Stillbirths occurring among singleton infants born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007. MAIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seaton, Sarah E, Field, David J, Draper, Elizabeth S, Manktelow, Bradley N, Smith, Gordon C S, Springett, Anna, Smith, Lucy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22735165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001100
_version_ 1782236661239775232
author Seaton, Sarah E
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
Manktelow, Bradley N
Smith, Gordon C S
Springett, Anna
Smith, Lucy K
author_facet Seaton, Sarah E
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
Manktelow, Bradley N
Smith, Gordon C S
Springett, Anna
Smith, Lucy K
author_sort Seaton, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess time trends in socioeconomic inequalities in overall and cause-specific stillbirth rates in England. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective study. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Stillbirths occurring among singleton infants born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cause-specific stillbirth rate per 10 000 births by deprivation tenth and year of birth. Deprivation measured using the UK index of multiple deprivation at Super Output Area level. METHODS: Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative deprivation gap (comparing the most and least deprived tenths) in rates of stillbirths (overall and cause-specific). Excess mortality was calculated by applying the rates seen in the least deprived tenth to the entire population at risk. Discussions with our local NHS multicentre ethics committee deemed that this analysis of national non-identifiable data did not require separate ethics approval. RESULTS: There were 44 stillbirths per 10 000 births, with no evidence of a change in rates over time. Rates were twice as high in the most deprived tenth compared with the least (rate ratio (RR) 2.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.2) with no evidence of a change over time. There was a significant deprivation gap for all specific causes except mechanical events (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5). The widest gap was seen for stillbirths due to antepartum haemorrhages (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8 to 3.5). No evidence of a change in the rate of stillbirth or deprivation gap over time was seen for any specific cause. CONCLUSION: A wide deprivation gap exists in stillbirth rates for most causes and is not diminishing. Unexplained antepartum stillbirths accounted for 50% of the deprivation gap, and a better understanding of these stillbirths is necessary to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3383980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33839802012-06-28 Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study Seaton, Sarah E Field, David J Draper, Elizabeth S Manktelow, Bradley N Smith, Gordon C S Springett, Anna Smith, Lucy K BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To assess time trends in socioeconomic inequalities in overall and cause-specific stillbirth rates in England. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective study. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Stillbirths occurring among singleton infants born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cause-specific stillbirth rate per 10 000 births by deprivation tenth and year of birth. Deprivation measured using the UK index of multiple deprivation at Super Output Area level. METHODS: Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative deprivation gap (comparing the most and least deprived tenths) in rates of stillbirths (overall and cause-specific). Excess mortality was calculated by applying the rates seen in the least deprived tenth to the entire population at risk. Discussions with our local NHS multicentre ethics committee deemed that this analysis of national non-identifiable data did not require separate ethics approval. RESULTS: There were 44 stillbirths per 10 000 births, with no evidence of a change in rates over time. Rates were twice as high in the most deprived tenth compared with the least (rate ratio (RR) 2.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.2) with no evidence of a change over time. There was a significant deprivation gap for all specific causes except mechanical events (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5). The widest gap was seen for stillbirths due to antepartum haemorrhages (RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8 to 3.5). No evidence of a change in the rate of stillbirth or deprivation gap over time was seen for any specific cause. CONCLUSION: A wide deprivation gap exists in stillbirth rates for most causes and is not diminishing. Unexplained antepartum stillbirths accounted for 50% of the deprivation gap, and a better understanding of these stillbirths is necessary to reduce socioeconomic inequalities. BMJ Group 2012-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3383980/ /pubmed/22735165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001100 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Seaton, Sarah E
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
Manktelow, Bradley N
Smith, Gordon C S
Springett, Anna
Smith, Lucy K
Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of stillbirths by cause: a population-based study
topic Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22735165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001100
work_keys_str_mv AT seatonsarahe socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT fielddavidj socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT draperelizabeths socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT manktelowbradleyn socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT smithgordoncs socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT springettanna socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy
AT smithlucyk socioeconomicinequalitiesintherateofstillbirthsbycauseapopulationbasedstudy