Cargando…

Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, continues to be a serious economic problem for the British cattle industry. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is partly responsible for maintenance of the disease and its transmission to cattle. Previous attempts to manage the disease by cull...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Graham C., McDonald, Robbie A., Wilkinson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039250
_version_ 1782236740265705472
author Smith, Graham C.
McDonald, Robbie A.
Wilkinson, David
author_facet Smith, Graham C.
McDonald, Robbie A.
Wilkinson, David
author_sort Smith, Graham C.
collection PubMed
description Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, continues to be a serious economic problem for the British cattle industry. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is partly responsible for maintenance of the disease and its transmission to cattle. Previous attempts to manage the disease by culling badgers have been hampered by social perturbation, which in some situations is associated with increases in the cattle herd incidence of bTB. Following the licensing of an injectable vaccine, we consider the relative merits of management strategies to reduce bTB in badgers, and thereby reduce cattle herd incidence. We used an established simulation model of the badger-cattle-TB system and investigated four proposed strategies: business as usual with no badger management, large-scale proactive badger culling, badger vaccination, and culling with a ring of vaccination around it. For ease of comparison with empirical data, model treatments were applied over 150 km(2) and were evaluated over the whole of a 300 km(2) area, comprising the core treatment area and a ring of approximately 2 km. The effects of treatment were evaluated over a 10-year period comprising treatment for five years and the subsequent five year period without treatment. Against a background of existing disease control measures, where 144 cattle herd incidents might be expected over 10 years, badger culling prevented 26 cattle herd incidents while vaccination prevented 16. Culling in the core 150 km(2) plus vaccination in a ring around it prevented about 40 cattle herd breakdowns by partly mitigating the negative effects of culling, although this approach clearly required greater effort. While model outcomes were robust to uncertainty in parameter estimates, the outcomes of culling were sensitive to low rates of land access for culling, low culling efficacy, and the early cessation of a culling strategy, all of which were likely to lead to an overall increase in cattle disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3384660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33846602012-07-03 Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle Smith, Graham C. McDonald, Robbie A. Wilkinson, David PLoS One Research Article Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, continues to be a serious economic problem for the British cattle industry. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is partly responsible for maintenance of the disease and its transmission to cattle. Previous attempts to manage the disease by culling badgers have been hampered by social perturbation, which in some situations is associated with increases in the cattle herd incidence of bTB. Following the licensing of an injectable vaccine, we consider the relative merits of management strategies to reduce bTB in badgers, and thereby reduce cattle herd incidence. We used an established simulation model of the badger-cattle-TB system and investigated four proposed strategies: business as usual with no badger management, large-scale proactive badger culling, badger vaccination, and culling with a ring of vaccination around it. For ease of comparison with empirical data, model treatments were applied over 150 km(2) and were evaluated over the whole of a 300 km(2) area, comprising the core treatment area and a ring of approximately 2 km. The effects of treatment were evaluated over a 10-year period comprising treatment for five years and the subsequent five year period without treatment. Against a background of existing disease control measures, where 144 cattle herd incidents might be expected over 10 years, badger culling prevented 26 cattle herd incidents while vaccination prevented 16. Culling in the core 150 km(2) plus vaccination in a ring around it prevented about 40 cattle herd breakdowns by partly mitigating the negative effects of culling, although this approach clearly required greater effort. While model outcomes were robust to uncertainty in parameter estimates, the outcomes of culling were sensitive to low rates of land access for culling, low culling efficacy, and the early cessation of a culling strategy, all of which were likely to lead to an overall increase in cattle disease. Public Library of Science 2012-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3384660/ /pubmed/22761746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039250 Text en Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Graham C.
McDonald, Robbie A.
Wilkinson, David
Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title_full Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title_fullStr Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title_short Comparing Badger (Meles meles) Management Strategies for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence in Cattle
title_sort comparing badger (meles meles) management strategies for reducing tuberculosis incidence in cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039250
work_keys_str_mv AT smithgrahamc comparingbadgermelesmelesmanagementstrategiesforreducingtuberculosisincidenceincattle
AT mcdonaldrobbiea comparingbadgermelesmelesmanagementstrategiesforreducingtuberculosisincidenceincattle
AT wilkinsondavid comparingbadgermelesmelesmanagementstrategiesforreducingtuberculosisincidenceincattle