Cargando…

Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts

Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Hee, Lee, Ho Yun, Lee, Kyung Soo, Kim, Jae-Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371
_version_ 1782236753796530176
author Kang, Hee
Lee, Ho Yun
Lee, Kyung Soo
Kim, Jae-Hun
author_facet Kang, Hee
Lee, Ho Yun
Lee, Kyung Soo
Kim, Jae-Hun
author_sort Kang, Hee
collection PubMed
description Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that may occur with targeted chemotherapy or even with conventional chemotherapy. The state-of-the-art multidetector CT is still playing an important role, by showing high-quality, high-resolution images that are appropriate enough to measure tumor size and its changes. Additional imaging biomarker devices such as dual energy CT, positron emission tomography, MRI including diffusion-weighted MRI shall be more frequently used for tumor response evaluation, because they provide detailed anatomic, and functional or metabolic change information during tumor treatment, particularly during targeted chemotherapy. This review elucidates morphologic and functional or metabolic approaches, and new concepts in the evaluation of tumor response in the era of personalized medicine (targeted chemotherapy).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3384819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33848192012-07-10 Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts Kang, Hee Lee, Ho Yun Lee, Kyung Soo Kim, Jae-Hun Korean J Radiol Review Article Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that may occur with targeted chemotherapy or even with conventional chemotherapy. The state-of-the-art multidetector CT is still playing an important role, by showing high-quality, high-resolution images that are appropriate enough to measure tumor size and its changes. Additional imaging biomarker devices such as dual energy CT, positron emission tomography, MRI including diffusion-weighted MRI shall be more frequently used for tumor response evaluation, because they provide detailed anatomic, and functional or metabolic change information during tumor treatment, particularly during targeted chemotherapy. This review elucidates morphologic and functional or metabolic approaches, and new concepts in the evaluation of tumor response in the era of personalized medicine (targeted chemotherapy). The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3384819/ /pubmed/22778559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kang, Hee
Lee, Ho Yun
Lee, Kyung Soo
Kim, Jae-Hun
Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title_full Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title_fullStr Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title_full_unstemmed Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title_short Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
title_sort imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghee imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts
AT leehoyun imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts
AT leekyungsoo imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts
AT kimjaehun imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts