Cargando…
Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts
Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371 |
_version_ | 1782236753796530176 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Hee Lee, Ho Yun Lee, Kyung Soo Kim, Jae-Hun |
author_facet | Kang, Hee Lee, Ho Yun Lee, Kyung Soo Kim, Jae-Hun |
author_sort | Kang, Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that may occur with targeted chemotherapy or even with conventional chemotherapy. The state-of-the-art multidetector CT is still playing an important role, by showing high-quality, high-resolution images that are appropriate enough to measure tumor size and its changes. Additional imaging biomarker devices such as dual energy CT, positron emission tomography, MRI including diffusion-weighted MRI shall be more frequently used for tumor response evaluation, because they provide detailed anatomic, and functional or metabolic change information during tumor treatment, particularly during targeted chemotherapy. This review elucidates morphologic and functional or metabolic approaches, and new concepts in the evaluation of tumor response in the era of personalized medicine (targeted chemotherapy). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3384819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33848192012-07-10 Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts Kang, Hee Lee, Ho Yun Lee, Kyung Soo Kim, Jae-Hun Korean J Radiol Review Article Tumor response may be assessed readily by the use of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1. However, the criteria mainly depend on tumor size changes. These criteria do not reflect other morphologic (tumor necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation), functional, or metabolic changes that may occur with targeted chemotherapy or even with conventional chemotherapy. The state-of-the-art multidetector CT is still playing an important role, by showing high-quality, high-resolution images that are appropriate enough to measure tumor size and its changes. Additional imaging biomarker devices such as dual energy CT, positron emission tomography, MRI including diffusion-weighted MRI shall be more frequently used for tumor response evaluation, because they provide detailed anatomic, and functional or metabolic change information during tumor treatment, particularly during targeted chemotherapy. This review elucidates morphologic and functional or metabolic approaches, and new concepts in the evaluation of tumor response in the era of personalized medicine (targeted chemotherapy). The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3384819/ /pubmed/22778559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kang, Hee Lee, Ho Yun Lee, Kyung Soo Kim, Jae-Hun Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title | Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title_full | Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title_fullStr | Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title_short | Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts |
title_sort | imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanghee imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts AT leehoyun imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts AT leekyungsoo imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts AT kimjaehun imagingbasedtumortreatmentresponseevaluationreviewofconventionalnewandemergingconcepts |