Cargando…

Influence of Signal Intensity Non-Uniformity on Brain Volumetry Using an Atlas-Based Method

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have reported pre-processing effects for brain volumetry; however, no study has investigated whether non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) correction processing results in reduced system dependency when using an atlas-based method. To address this shortcomin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goto, Masami, Abe, Osamu, Miyati, Tosiaki, Kabasawa, Hiroyuki, Takao, Hidemasa, Hayashi, Naoto, Kurosu, Tomomi, Iwatsubo, Takeshi, Yamashita, Fumio, Matsuda, Hiroshi, Mori, Harushi, Kunimatsu, Akira, Aoki, Shigeki, Ino, Kenji, Yano, Keiichi, Ohtomo, Kuni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.391
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Many studies have reported pre-processing effects for brain volumetry; however, no study has investigated whether non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) correction processing results in reduced system dependency when using an atlas-based method. To address this shortcoming, the present study assessed whether N3 correction processing provides reduced system dependency in atlas-based volumetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contiguous sagittal T1-weighted images of the brain were obtained from 21 healthy participants, by using five magnetic resonance protocols. After image preprocessing using the Statistical Parametric Mapping 5 software, we measured the structural volume of the segmented images with the WFU-PickAtlas software. We applied six different bias-correction levels (Regularization 10, Regularization 0.0001, Regularization 0, Regularization 10 with N3, Regularization 0.0001 with N3, and Regularization 0 with N3) to each set of images. The structural volume change ratio (%) was defined as the change ratio (%) = (100 × [measured volume - mean volume of five magnetic resonance protocols] / mean volume of five magnetic resonance protocols) for each bias-correction level. RESULTS: A low change ratio was synonymous with lower system dependency. The results showed that the images with the N3 correction had a lower change ratio compared with those without the N3 correction. CONCLUSION: The present study is the first atlas-based volumetry study to show that the precision of atlas-based volumetry improves when using N3-corrected images. Therefore, correction for signal intensity non-uniformity is strongly advised for multi-scanner or multi-site imaging trials.