Cargando…

Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the introducer curving technique is useful in decreasing the degree of tilting of transfemoral Tulip filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample group consisted of 108 patients with deep vein thrombosis who were enrolled and planned to undergo thrombolysis, and w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Liang, Huang, De-sheng, Shen, Jing, Tong, Jia-jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778571
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.483
_version_ 1782236756573159424
author Xiao, Liang
Huang, De-sheng
Shen, Jing
Tong, Jia-jie
author_facet Xiao, Liang
Huang, De-sheng
Shen, Jing
Tong, Jia-jie
author_sort Xiao, Liang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the introducer curving technique is useful in decreasing the degree of tilting of transfemoral Tulip filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample group consisted of 108 patients with deep vein thrombosis who were enrolled and planned to undergo thrombolysis, and who accepted transfemoral Tulip filter insertion procedure. The patients were randomly divided into Group C and Group T. The introducer curving technique was Adopted in Group T. The post-implantation filter tilting angle (ACF) was measured in an anteroposterior projection. The retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was measured via tangential cavogram during retrieval. RESULTS: The overall average ACF was 5.8 ± 4.14 degrees. In Group C, the average ACF was 7.1 ± 4.52 degrees. In Group T, the average ACF was 4.4 ± 3.20 degrees. The groups displayed a statistically significant difference (t = 3.573, p = 0.001) in ACF. Additionally, the difference of ACF between the left and right approaches turned out to be statistically significant (7.1 ± 4.59 vs. 5.1 ± 3.82, t = 2.301, p = 0.023). The proportion of severe tilt (ACF ≥ 10°) in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (9.3% vs. 24.1%, χ(2) = 4.267, p = 0.039). Between the groups, the difference in the rate of the retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was also statistically significant (2.9% vs. 24.2%, χ(2) = 5.030, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The introducer curving technique appears to minimize the incidence and extent of transfemoral Tulip filter tilting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3384831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33848312012-07-10 Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter Xiao, Liang Huang, De-sheng Shen, Jing Tong, Jia-jie Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the introducer curving technique is useful in decreasing the degree of tilting of transfemoral Tulip filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample group consisted of 108 patients with deep vein thrombosis who were enrolled and planned to undergo thrombolysis, and who accepted transfemoral Tulip filter insertion procedure. The patients were randomly divided into Group C and Group T. The introducer curving technique was Adopted in Group T. The post-implantation filter tilting angle (ACF) was measured in an anteroposterior projection. The retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was measured via tangential cavogram during retrieval. RESULTS: The overall average ACF was 5.8 ± 4.14 degrees. In Group C, the average ACF was 7.1 ± 4.52 degrees. In Group T, the average ACF was 4.4 ± 3.20 degrees. The groups displayed a statistically significant difference (t = 3.573, p = 0.001) in ACF. Additionally, the difference of ACF between the left and right approaches turned out to be statistically significant (7.1 ± 4.59 vs. 5.1 ± 3.82, t = 2.301, p = 0.023). The proportion of severe tilt (ACF ≥ 10°) in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (9.3% vs. 24.1%, χ(2) = 4.267, p = 0.039). Between the groups, the difference in the rate of the retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was also statistically significant (2.9% vs. 24.2%, χ(2) = 5.030, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The introducer curving technique appears to minimize the incidence and extent of transfemoral Tulip filter tilting. The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3384831/ /pubmed/22778571 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.483 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xiao, Liang
Huang, De-sheng
Shen, Jing
Tong, Jia-jie
Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title_full Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title_fullStr Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title_full_unstemmed Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title_short Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral Günther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter
title_sort introducer curving technique for the prevention of tilting of transfemoral günther tulip inferior vena cava filter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778571
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.483
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoliang introducercurvingtechniqueforthepreventionoftiltingoftransfemoralgunthertulipinferiorvenacavafilter
AT huangdesheng introducercurvingtechniqueforthepreventionoftiltingoftransfemoralgunthertulipinferiorvenacavafilter
AT shenjing introducercurvingtechniqueforthepreventionoftiltingoftransfemoralgunthertulipinferiorvenacavafilter
AT tongjiajie introducercurvingtechniqueforthepreventionoftiltingoftransfemoralgunthertulipinferiorvenacavafilter