Cargando…

Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training

The college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshman...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Elizabeth A., Potter, Kerry L., Estabrooks, Paul A., Davy, Brenda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769
_version_ 1782236776541192192
author Dennis, Elizabeth A.
Potter, Kerry L.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Davy, Brenda M.
author_facet Dennis, Elizabeth A.
Potter, Kerry L.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Davy, Brenda M.
author_sort Dennis, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description The college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshman weight gain. One intervention provided opportunities to improve outcome expectations and self-efficacy within a social cognitive theory framework (SCT), while the other targeted the same variables but focused on explicit training in self-regulation skills (SCTSR). Methods. Freshmen (n = 45) aged >18 years were randomized to a 14-week intervention, SCT or SCTSR; both included online modules and in-class meetings. Of the 45 students randomized, 5 withdrew before the classes began and 39 completed pre- and posttesting. Primary outcomes included body weight/composition, health behaviors, and program acceptability. Analyses included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and bivariate correlational analyses. Results. Body weight increased over the 14-week period, but there was no group difference. Percent body fat increased in SCTSR but not SCT (mean difference: SCTSR, +1.63 ± 0.52%; SCT, −0.25 ± 0.45%; P = 0.01). Class attendance was 100% (SCTSR) and 98% (SCT); SCTSR students (>50%) remarked that the online tracking required “too much time.” Conclusions. The intervention was well received, although there were no improvements in weight outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3384957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33849572012-07-09 Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training Dennis, Elizabeth A. Potter, Kerry L. Estabrooks, Paul A. Davy, Brenda M. J Obes Research Article The college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshman weight gain. One intervention provided opportunities to improve outcome expectations and self-efficacy within a social cognitive theory framework (SCT), while the other targeted the same variables but focused on explicit training in self-regulation skills (SCTSR). Methods. Freshmen (n = 45) aged >18 years were randomized to a 14-week intervention, SCT or SCTSR; both included online modules and in-class meetings. Of the 45 students randomized, 5 withdrew before the classes began and 39 completed pre- and posttesting. Primary outcomes included body weight/composition, health behaviors, and program acceptability. Analyses included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and bivariate correlational analyses. Results. Body weight increased over the 14-week period, but there was no group difference. Percent body fat increased in SCTSR but not SCT (mean difference: SCTSR, +1.63 ± 0.52%; SCT, −0.25 ± 0.45%; P = 0.01). Class attendance was 100% (SCTSR) and 98% (SCT); SCTSR students (>50%) remarked that the online tracking required “too much time.” Conclusions. The intervention was well received, although there were no improvements in weight outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3384957/ /pubmed/22778919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769 Text en Copyright © 2012 Elizabeth A. Dennis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dennis, Elizabeth A.
Potter, Kerry L.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Davy, Brenda M.
Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_full Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_fullStr Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_full_unstemmed Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_short Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_sort weight gain prevention for college freshmen: comparing two social cognitive theory-based interventions with and without explicit self-regulation training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769
work_keys_str_mv AT denniselizabetha weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT potterkerryl weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT estabrookspaula weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT davybrendam weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining