Cargando…

Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience

AIM: Being an uncommon congenital condition, the treatment modalities of maxillonasal dysplasia are not clearly defined. Our aim is to discuss the availability and utility of various treatment options to achieve optimum results. In patients with Binder's syndrome, the midface appears flattened,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshpande, Sanjeev N., Juneja, Manpreet H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22754155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.96588
_version_ 1782236865194098688
author Deshpande, Sanjeev N.
Juneja, Manpreet H.
author_facet Deshpande, Sanjeev N.
Juneja, Manpreet H.
author_sort Deshpande, Sanjeev N.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Being an uncommon congenital condition, the treatment modalities of maxillonasal dysplasia are not clearly defined. Our aim is to discuss the availability and utility of various treatment options to achieve optimum results. In patients with Binder's syndrome, the midface appears flattened, the columella is short and the upper lip slants backwards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report here 15 patients with Binder's syndrome who were operated over a period of 5 years. Different treatment options in the form of correction of the depressed nasal dorsum and maxillary hypoplasia with split cranial bone graft or synthetic materials such as high-density porous polyethylene implant were used. Two patients with Angle class III malocclusion underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement. The patients were followed over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: We achieved a reasonable augmentation of the nose and the maxilla in our patients. We faced complications in two of our patients; in one patient there was fracture of the dorsal nasal bone graft and the other patient had protrusion of paranasal screws into the palate, which were removed. CONCLUSION: In this series of cases, we were able to utilise various treatment modalities appropriately to achieve satisfactory outcome with no significant complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3385401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33854012012-07-02 Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience Deshpande, Sanjeev N. Juneja, Manpreet H. Indian J Plast Surg Original Article AIM: Being an uncommon congenital condition, the treatment modalities of maxillonasal dysplasia are not clearly defined. Our aim is to discuss the availability and utility of various treatment options to achieve optimum results. In patients with Binder's syndrome, the midface appears flattened, the columella is short and the upper lip slants backwards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report here 15 patients with Binder's syndrome who were operated over a period of 5 years. Different treatment options in the form of correction of the depressed nasal dorsum and maxillary hypoplasia with split cranial bone graft or synthetic materials such as high-density porous polyethylene implant were used. Two patients with Angle class III malocclusion underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement. The patients were followed over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: We achieved a reasonable augmentation of the nose and the maxilla in our patients. We faced complications in two of our patients; in one patient there was fracture of the dorsal nasal bone graft and the other patient had protrusion of paranasal screws into the palate, which were removed. CONCLUSION: In this series of cases, we were able to utilise various treatment modalities appropriately to achieve satisfactory outcome with no significant complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3385401/ /pubmed/22754155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.96588 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Deshpande, Sanjeev N.
Juneja, Manpreet H.
Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title_full Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title_fullStr Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title_full_unstemmed Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title_short Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: Our experience
title_sort binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia) different treatment modalities: our experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22754155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.96588
work_keys_str_mv AT deshpandesanjeevn binderssyndromemaxillonasaldysplasiadifferenttreatmentmodalitiesourexperience
AT junejamanpreeth binderssyndromemaxillonasaldysplasiadifferenttreatmentmodalitiesourexperience