Cargando…
Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808367 |
_version_ | 1782236881805639680 |
---|---|
author | Maleki-Ravasan, N Oshaghi, MA Javadian, E Rassi, Y Sadraei, J Mohtarami, F |
author_facet | Maleki-Ravasan, N Oshaghi, MA Javadian, E Rassi, Y Sadraei, J Mohtarami, F |
author_sort | Maleki-Ravasan, N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental study was performed in the Insect Molecular Biology Laboratory of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2006–2007. For PCR-RFLP a set of conserved vertebrate primers were used to amplify a part of the host mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene followed by digestion of the PCR products by Hae III enzyme. RESULTS: The PCR-RFLP and ELISA assays revealed that 34% and 27% of field-collected sand flies had fed on humans, respectively. Additionally, PCR-RFLP assays could reveal specific host DNA as well as the components of mixed blood meals. Results of PCR-RFLP assay showed that the sand flies had fed on cow (54%), human (10%), dog (4%), human and cow (21%), dog and cow (14%), and human and dog (3%). CONCLUSION: The results can provide a novel method for rapid diagnosis of blood meal taken by sandflies. The advantages and limitations of PCR and ELISA assays are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3385529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33855292012-07-17 Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays Maleki-Ravasan, N Oshaghi, MA Javadian, E Rassi, Y Sadraei, J Mohtarami, F Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental study was performed in the Insect Molecular Biology Laboratory of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2006–2007. For PCR-RFLP a set of conserved vertebrate primers were used to amplify a part of the host mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene followed by digestion of the PCR products by Hae III enzyme. RESULTS: The PCR-RFLP and ELISA assays revealed that 34% and 27% of field-collected sand flies had fed on humans, respectively. Additionally, PCR-RFLP assays could reveal specific host DNA as well as the components of mixed blood meals. Results of PCR-RFLP assay showed that the sand flies had fed on cow (54%), human (10%), dog (4%), human and cow (21%), dog and cow (14%), and human and dog (3%). CONCLUSION: The results can provide a novel method for rapid diagnosis of blood meal taken by sandflies. The advantages and limitations of PCR and ELISA assays are discussed. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3385529/ /pubmed/22808367 Text en Copyright © Iranian Society of Medical Entomology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maleki-Ravasan, N Oshaghi, MA Javadian, E Rassi, Y Sadraei, J Mohtarami, F Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title | Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title_full | Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title_fullStr | Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title_short | Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays |
title_sort | blood meal identification in field-captured sand flies: comparison of pcr-rflp and elisa assays |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malekiravasann bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays AT oshaghima bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays AT javadiane bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays AT rassiy bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays AT sadraeij bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays AT mohtaramif bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays |