Cargando…

Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maleki-Ravasan, N, Oshaghi, MA, Javadian, E, Rassi, Y, Sadraei, J, Mohtarami, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808367
_version_ 1782236881805639680
author Maleki-Ravasan, N
Oshaghi, MA
Javadian, E
Rassi, Y
Sadraei, J
Mohtarami, F
author_facet Maleki-Ravasan, N
Oshaghi, MA
Javadian, E
Rassi, Y
Sadraei, J
Mohtarami, F
author_sort Maleki-Ravasan, N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental study was performed in the Insect Molecular Biology Laboratory of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2006–2007. For PCR-RFLP a set of conserved vertebrate primers were used to amplify a part of the host mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene followed by digestion of the PCR products by Hae III enzyme. RESULTS: The PCR-RFLP and ELISA assays revealed that 34% and 27% of field-collected sand flies had fed on humans, respectively. Additionally, PCR-RFLP assays could reveal specific host DNA as well as the components of mixed blood meals. Results of PCR-RFLP assay showed that the sand flies had fed on cow (54%), human (10%), dog (4%), human and cow (21%), dog and cow (14%), and human and dog (3%). CONCLUSION: The results can provide a novel method for rapid diagnosis of blood meal taken by sandflies. The advantages and limitations of PCR and ELISA assays are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3385529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33855292012-07-17 Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays Maleki-Ravasan, N Oshaghi, MA Javadian, E Rassi, Y Sadraei, J Mohtarami, F Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a PCR-RFLP assay based on available sequences of putative vertebrate hosts to identify blood meals ingested by field female sand fly in the northwest of Iran. In addition, the utility of PCR-RFLP was compared with ELISA as a standard method. METHODS: This experimental study was performed in the Insect Molecular Biology Laboratory of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2006–2007. For PCR-RFLP a set of conserved vertebrate primers were used to amplify a part of the host mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene followed by digestion of the PCR products by Hae III enzyme. RESULTS: The PCR-RFLP and ELISA assays revealed that 34% and 27% of field-collected sand flies had fed on humans, respectively. Additionally, PCR-RFLP assays could reveal specific host DNA as well as the components of mixed blood meals. Results of PCR-RFLP assay showed that the sand flies had fed on cow (54%), human (10%), dog (4%), human and cow (21%), dog and cow (14%), and human and dog (3%). CONCLUSION: The results can provide a novel method for rapid diagnosis of blood meal taken by sandflies. The advantages and limitations of PCR and ELISA assays are discussed. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3385529/ /pubmed/22808367 Text en Copyright © Iranian Society of Medical Entomology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maleki-Ravasan, N
Oshaghi, MA
Javadian, E
Rassi, Y
Sadraei, J
Mohtarami, F
Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title_full Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title_fullStr Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title_full_unstemmed Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title_short Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays
title_sort blood meal identification in field-captured sand flies: comparison of pcr-rflp and elisa assays
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808367
work_keys_str_mv AT malekiravasann bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays
AT oshaghima bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays
AT javadiane bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays
AT rassiy bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays
AT sadraeij bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays
AT mohtaramif bloodmealidentificationinfieldcapturedsandfliescomparisonofpcrrflpandelisaassays