Cargando…

New thinking, innateness and inherited representation

The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of inn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shea, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125
_version_ 1782236914981535744
author Shea, Nicholas
author_facet Shea, Nicholas
author_sort Shea, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3385690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33856902012-08-05 New thinking, innateness and inherited representation Shea, Nicholas Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution. The Royal Society 2012-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3385690/ /pubmed/22734066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125 Text en This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Shea, Nicholas
New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title_full New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title_fullStr New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title_full_unstemmed New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title_short New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
title_sort new thinking, innateness and inherited representation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125
work_keys_str_mv AT sheanicholas newthinkinginnatenessandinheritedrepresentation