Cargando…
New thinking, innateness and inherited representation
The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of inn...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125 |
_version_ | 1782236914981535744 |
---|---|
author | Shea, Nicholas |
author_facet | Shea, Nicholas |
author_sort | Shea, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3385690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33856902012-08-05 New thinking, innateness and inherited representation Shea, Nicholas Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution. The Royal Society 2012-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3385690/ /pubmed/22734066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125 Text en This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Shea, Nicholas New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title | New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title_full | New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title_fullStr | New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title_full_unstemmed | New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title_short | New thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
title_sort | new thinking, innateness and inherited representation |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22734066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheanicholas newthinkinginnatenessandinheritedrepresentation |