Cargando…
Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture
Task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging (TF-fMRI) has great potential for advancing the understanding and treatment of neurologic illness. However, as with all measures of neural activity, variability is a hallmark of intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) identified by TF-fMRI. This variabi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039731 |
_version_ | 1782236956809232384 |
---|---|
author | Jones, David T. Vemuri, Prashanthi Murphy, Matthew C. Gunter, Jeffrey L. Senjem, Matthew L. Machulda, Mary M. Przybelski, Scott A. Gregg, Brian E. Kantarci, Kejal Knopman, David S. Boeve, Bradley F. Petersen, Ronald C. Jack, Clifford R. |
author_facet | Jones, David T. Vemuri, Prashanthi Murphy, Matthew C. Gunter, Jeffrey L. Senjem, Matthew L. Machulda, Mary M. Przybelski, Scott A. Gregg, Brian E. Kantarci, Kejal Knopman, David S. Boeve, Bradley F. Petersen, Ronald C. Jack, Clifford R. |
author_sort | Jones, David T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging (TF-fMRI) has great potential for advancing the understanding and treatment of neurologic illness. However, as with all measures of neural activity, variability is a hallmark of intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) identified by TF-fMRI. This variability has hampered efforts to define a robust metric of connectivity suitable as a biomarker for neurologic illness. We hypothesized that some of this variability rather than representing noise in the measurement process, is related to a fundamental feature of connectivity within ICNs, which is their non-stationary nature. To test this hypothesis, we used a large (n = 892) population-based sample of older subjects to construct a well characterized atlas of 68 functional regions, which were categorized based on independent component analysis network of origin, anatomical locations, and a functional meta-analysis. These regions were then used to construct dynamic graphical representations of brain connectivity within a sliding time window for each subject. This allowed us to demonstrate the non-stationary nature of the brain’s modular organization and assign each region to a “meta-modular” group. Using this grouping, we then compared dwell time in strong sub-network configurations of the default mode network (DMN) between 28 subjects with Alzheimer’s dementia and 56 cognitively normal elderly subjects matched 1∶2 on age, gender, and education. We found that differences in connectivity we and others have previously observed in Alzheimer’s disease can be explained by differences in dwell time in DMN sub-network configurations, rather than steady state connectivity magnitude. DMN dwell time in specific modular configurations may also underlie the TF-fMRI findings that have been described in mild cognitive impairment and cognitively normal subjects who are at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3386248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33862482012-07-03 Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture Jones, David T. Vemuri, Prashanthi Murphy, Matthew C. Gunter, Jeffrey L. Senjem, Matthew L. Machulda, Mary M. Przybelski, Scott A. Gregg, Brian E. Kantarci, Kejal Knopman, David S. Boeve, Bradley F. Petersen, Ronald C. Jack, Clifford R. PLoS One Research Article Task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging (TF-fMRI) has great potential for advancing the understanding and treatment of neurologic illness. However, as with all measures of neural activity, variability is a hallmark of intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) identified by TF-fMRI. This variability has hampered efforts to define a robust metric of connectivity suitable as a biomarker for neurologic illness. We hypothesized that some of this variability rather than representing noise in the measurement process, is related to a fundamental feature of connectivity within ICNs, which is their non-stationary nature. To test this hypothesis, we used a large (n = 892) population-based sample of older subjects to construct a well characterized atlas of 68 functional regions, which were categorized based on independent component analysis network of origin, anatomical locations, and a functional meta-analysis. These regions were then used to construct dynamic graphical representations of brain connectivity within a sliding time window for each subject. This allowed us to demonstrate the non-stationary nature of the brain’s modular organization and assign each region to a “meta-modular” group. Using this grouping, we then compared dwell time in strong sub-network configurations of the default mode network (DMN) between 28 subjects with Alzheimer’s dementia and 56 cognitively normal elderly subjects matched 1∶2 on age, gender, and education. We found that differences in connectivity we and others have previously observed in Alzheimer’s disease can be explained by differences in dwell time in DMN sub-network configurations, rather than steady state connectivity magnitude. DMN dwell time in specific modular configurations may also underlie the TF-fMRI findings that have been described in mild cognitive impairment and cognitively normal subjects who are at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. Public Library of Science 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3386248/ /pubmed/22761880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039731 Text en Jones et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jones, David T. Vemuri, Prashanthi Murphy, Matthew C. Gunter, Jeffrey L. Senjem, Matthew L. Machulda, Mary M. Przybelski, Scott A. Gregg, Brian E. Kantarci, Kejal Knopman, David S. Boeve, Bradley F. Petersen, Ronald C. Jack, Clifford R. Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title | Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title_full | Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title_fullStr | Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title_short | Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture |
title_sort | non-stationarity in the “resting brain’s” modular architecture |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesdavidt nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT vemuriprashanthi nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT murphymatthewc nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT gunterjeffreyl nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT senjemmatthewl nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT machuldamarym nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT przybelskiscotta nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT greggbriane nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT kantarcikejal nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT knopmandavids nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT boevebradleyf nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT petersenronaldc nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture AT jackcliffordr nonstationarityintherestingbrainsmodulararchitecture |