Cargando…

Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

BACKGROUND: An evaluation of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) for the central 10–2 visual field test procedure in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is presented in order to determine methods of quantifying the central sensitivity l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acton, Jennifer H., Gibson, Jonathan M., Cubbidge, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22768178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039944
_version_ 1782237036959236096
author Acton, Jennifer H.
Gibson, Jonathan M.
Cubbidge, Robert P.
author_facet Acton, Jennifer H.
Gibson, Jonathan M.
Cubbidge, Robert P.
author_sort Acton, Jennifer H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An evaluation of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) for the central 10–2 visual field test procedure in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is presented in order to determine methods of quantifying the central sensitivity loss in patients at various stages of AMD. METHODS: 10–2 SAP and SWAP Humphrey visual fields and stereoscopic fundus photographs were collected in 27 eyes of 27 patients with AMD and 22 eyes of 22 normal subjects. RESULTS: Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) varied significantly with stage of disease in SAP (both p<0.001) and SWAP (both p<0.001), but post hoc analysis revealed overlap of functional values among stages. In SWAP, indices of focal loss were more sensitive to detecting differences in AMD from normal. SWAP defects were greater in depth and area than those in SAP. Central sensitivity (within 1°) changed by −3.9 and −4.9 dB per stage in SAP and SWAP, respectively. Based on defect maps, an AMD Severity Index was derived. CONCLUSIONS: Global indices of focal loss were more sensitive to detecting early stage AMD from normal. The SWAP sensitivity decline with advancing stage of AMD was greater than in SAP. A new AMD Severity Index quantifies visual field defects on a continuous scale. Although not all patients are suitable for SWAP examinations, it is of value as a tool in research studies of visual loss in AMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3386934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33869342012-07-05 Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Acton, Jennifer H. Gibson, Jonathan M. Cubbidge, Robert P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: An evaluation of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) for the central 10–2 visual field test procedure in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is presented in order to determine methods of quantifying the central sensitivity loss in patients at various stages of AMD. METHODS: 10–2 SAP and SWAP Humphrey visual fields and stereoscopic fundus photographs were collected in 27 eyes of 27 patients with AMD and 22 eyes of 22 normal subjects. RESULTS: Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) varied significantly with stage of disease in SAP (both p<0.001) and SWAP (both p<0.001), but post hoc analysis revealed overlap of functional values among stages. In SWAP, indices of focal loss were more sensitive to detecting differences in AMD from normal. SWAP defects were greater in depth and area than those in SAP. Central sensitivity (within 1°) changed by −3.9 and −4.9 dB per stage in SAP and SWAP, respectively. Based on defect maps, an AMD Severity Index was derived. CONCLUSIONS: Global indices of focal loss were more sensitive to detecting early stage AMD from normal. The SWAP sensitivity decline with advancing stage of AMD was greater than in SAP. A new AMD Severity Index quantifies visual field defects on a continuous scale. Although not all patients are suitable for SWAP examinations, it is of value as a tool in research studies of visual loss in AMD. Public Library of Science 2012-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3386934/ /pubmed/22768178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039944 Text en Acton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Acton, Jennifer H.
Gibson, Jonathan M.
Cubbidge, Robert P.
Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_full Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_fullStr Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_short Quantification of Visual Field Loss in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
title_sort quantification of visual field loss in age-related macular degeneration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3386934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22768178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039944
work_keys_str_mv AT actonjenniferh quantificationofvisualfieldlossinagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT gibsonjonathanm quantificationofvisualfieldlossinagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT cubbidgerobertp quantificationofvisualfieldlossinagerelatedmaculardegeneration