Cargando…

Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice

Many advances in medicine have been achieved through challenging established dogma with revolutionary thought and novel practices. Each and every specialty is reinvigorated by regular re-evaluation of processes and practices in the light of new evidence and fresh conceptualization. Challenge can gal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, Mervyn, Matthay, Michael A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10245
_version_ 1782237101536837632
author Singer, Mervyn
Matthay, Michael A
author_facet Singer, Mervyn
Matthay, Michael A
author_sort Singer, Mervyn
collection PubMed
description Many advances in medicine have been achieved through challenging established dogma with revolutionary thought and novel practices. Each and every specialty is reinvigorated by regular re-evaluation of processes and practices in the light of new evidence and fresh conceptualization. Challenge can galvanize fresh thinking and new approaches, yet may also reinforce and strengthen traditional paradigms if the prevailing orthodoxy is subsequently revalidated. This article is a synopsis of a roundtable meeting held in Brussels in March 2010 designed specifically to confront doctrine with reasoned scientific argument, and to propose new ideas for advancing critical care practices and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3387582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33875822012-07-26 Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice Singer, Mervyn Matthay, Michael A Crit Care Review Many advances in medicine have been achieved through challenging established dogma with revolutionary thought and novel practices. Each and every specialty is reinvigorated by regular re-evaluation of processes and practices in the light of new evidence and fresh conceptualization. Challenge can galvanize fresh thinking and new approaches, yet may also reinforce and strengthen traditional paradigms if the prevailing orthodoxy is subsequently revalidated. This article is a synopsis of a roundtable meeting held in Brussels in March 2010 designed specifically to confront doctrine with reasoned scientific argument, and to propose new ideas for advancing critical care practices and outcomes. BioMed Central 2011 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3387582/ /pubmed/21888690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10245 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Singer, Mervyn
Matthay, Michael A
Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title_full Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title_fullStr Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title_short Clinical review: Thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
title_sort clinical review: thinking outside the box - an iconoclastic view of current practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10245
work_keys_str_mv AT singermervyn clinicalreviewthinkingoutsidetheboxaniconoclasticviewofcurrentpractice
AT matthaymichaela clinicalreviewthinkingoutsidetheboxaniconoclasticviewofcurrentpractice