Cargando…

Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?

In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors'...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecconi, Maurizio, Bennett, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287
_version_ 1782237103335145472
author Cecconi, Maurizio
Bennett, David
author_facet Cecconi, Maurizio
Bennett, David
author_sort Cecconi, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors' results suggest that it makes no difference. We discuss these findings and compare them to the literature on early goal-directed therapy in which monitors are used early but with a protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3387590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33875902012-07-28 Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? Cecconi, Maurizio Bennett, David Crit Care Commentary In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors' results suggest that it makes no difference. We discuss these findings and compare them to the literature on early goal-directed therapy in which monitors are used early but with a protocol. BioMed Central 2011 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3387590/ /pubmed/21888681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Cecconi, Maurizio
Bennett, David
Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title_full Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title_fullStr Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title_full_unstemmed Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title_short Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
title_sort should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable icu patients?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287
work_keys_str_mv AT cecconimaurizio shouldweuseearlylessinvasivehemodynamicmonitoringinunstableicupatients
AT bennettdavid shouldweuseearlylessinvasivehemodynamicmonitoringinunstableicupatients