Cargando…
Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients?
In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors'...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287 |
_version_ | 1782237103335145472 |
---|---|
author | Cecconi, Maurizio Bennett, David |
author_facet | Cecconi, Maurizio Bennett, David |
author_sort | Cecconi, Maurizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors' results suggest that it makes no difference. We discuss these findings and compare them to the literature on early goal-directed therapy in which monitors are used early but with a protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3387590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33875902012-07-28 Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? Cecconi, Maurizio Bennett, David Crit Care Commentary In the previous issue of Critical Care, Takala and colleagues presented the results of a multicenter study to investigate whether the early presence of less invasive hemodynamic monitoring improves outcome in patients admitted with hemodynamic instability to the intensive care unit. The authors' results suggest that it makes no difference. We discuss these findings and compare them to the literature on early goal-directed therapy in which monitors are used early but with a protocol. BioMed Central 2011 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3387590/ /pubmed/21888681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Cecconi, Maurizio Bennett, David Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title | Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title_full | Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title_fullStr | Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title_short | Should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable ICU patients? |
title_sort | should we use early less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in unstable icu patients? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21888681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cecconimaurizio shouldweuseearlylessinvasivehemodynamicmonitoringinunstableicupatients AT bennettdavid shouldweuseearlylessinvasivehemodynamicmonitoringinunstableicupatients |