Cargando…
Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodyn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291 |
_version_ | 1782237103772401664 |
---|---|
author | Vincent, Jean-Louis Rhodes, Andrew Perel, Azriel Martin, Greg S Rocca, Giorgio Della Vallet, Benoit Pinsky, Michael R Hofer, Christoph K Teboul, Jean-Louis de Boode, Willem-Pieter Scolletta, Sabino Vieillard-Baron, Antoine De Backer, Daniel Walley, Keith R Maggiorini, Marco Singer, Mervyn |
author_facet | Vincent, Jean-Louis Rhodes, Andrew Perel, Azriel Martin, Greg S Rocca, Giorgio Della Vallet, Benoit Pinsky, Michael R Hofer, Christoph K Teboul, Jean-Louis de Boode, Willem-Pieter Scolletta, Sabino Vieillard-Baron, Antoine De Backer, Daniel Walley, Keith R Maggiorini, Marco Singer, Mervyn |
author_sort | Vincent, Jean-Louis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3387592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33875922012-08-18 Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 Vincent, Jean-Louis Rhodes, Andrew Perel, Azriel Martin, Greg S Rocca, Giorgio Della Vallet, Benoit Pinsky, Michael R Hofer, Christoph K Teboul, Jean-Louis de Boode, Willem-Pieter Scolletta, Sabino Vieillard-Baron, Antoine De Backer, Daniel Walley, Keith R Maggiorini, Marco Singer, Mervyn Crit Care Review Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. BioMed Central 2011 2011-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3387592/ /pubmed/21884645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Vincent, Jean-Louis Rhodes, Andrew Perel, Azriel Martin, Greg S Rocca, Giorgio Della Vallet, Benoit Pinsky, Michael R Hofer, Christoph K Teboul, Jean-Louis de Boode, Willem-Pieter Scolletta, Sabino Vieillard-Baron, Antoine De Backer, Daniel Walley, Keith R Maggiorini, Marco Singer, Mervyn Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title | Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title_full | Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title_fullStr | Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title_short | Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
title_sort | clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vincentjeanlouis clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT rhodesandrew clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT perelazriel clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT martingregs clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT roccagiorgiodella clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT valletbenoit clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT pinskymichaelr clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT hoferchristophk clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT tebouljeanlouis clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT deboodewillempieter clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT scollettasabino clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT vieillardbaronantoine clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT debackerdaniel clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT walleykeithr clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT maggiorinimarco clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 AT singermervyn clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16 |