Cargando…

Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16

Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincent, Jean-Louis, Rhodes, Andrew, Perel, Azriel, Martin, Greg S, Rocca, Giorgio Della, Vallet, Benoit, Pinsky, Michael R, Hofer, Christoph K, Teboul, Jean-Louis, de Boode, Willem-Pieter, Scolletta, Sabino, Vieillard-Baron, Antoine, De Backer, Daniel, Walley, Keith R, Maggiorini, Marco, Singer, Mervyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291
_version_ 1782237103772401664
author Vincent, Jean-Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
Perel, Azriel
Martin, Greg S
Rocca, Giorgio Della
Vallet, Benoit
Pinsky, Michael R
Hofer, Christoph K
Teboul, Jean-Louis
de Boode, Willem-Pieter
Scolletta, Sabino
Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
De Backer, Daniel
Walley, Keith R
Maggiorini, Marco
Singer, Mervyn
author_facet Vincent, Jean-Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
Perel, Azriel
Martin, Greg S
Rocca, Giorgio Della
Vallet, Benoit
Pinsky, Michael R
Hofer, Christoph K
Teboul, Jean-Louis
de Boode, Willem-Pieter
Scolletta, Sabino
Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
De Backer, Daniel
Walley, Keith R
Maggiorini, Marco
Singer, Mervyn
author_sort Vincent, Jean-Louis
collection PubMed
description Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3387592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33875922012-08-18 Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16 Vincent, Jean-Louis Rhodes, Andrew Perel, Azriel Martin, Greg S Rocca, Giorgio Della Vallet, Benoit Pinsky, Michael R Hofer, Christoph K Teboul, Jean-Louis de Boode, Willem-Pieter Scolletta, Sabino Vieillard-Baron, Antoine De Backer, Daniel Walley, Keith R Maggiorini, Marco Singer, Mervyn Crit Care Review Hemodynamic monitoring plays a fundamental role in the management of acutely ill patients. With increased concerns about the use of invasive techniques, notably the pulmonary artery catheter, to measure cardiac output, recent years have seen an influx of new, less-invasive means of measuring hemodynamic variables, leaving the clinician somewhat bewildered as to which technique, if any, is best and which he/she should use. In this consensus paper, we try to provide some clarification, offering an objective review of the available monitoring systems, including their specific advantages and limitations, and highlighting some key principles underlying hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. BioMed Central 2011 2011-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3387592/ /pubmed/21884645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Vincent, Jean-Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
Perel, Azriel
Martin, Greg S
Rocca, Giorgio Della
Vallet, Benoit
Pinsky, Michael R
Hofer, Christoph K
Teboul, Jean-Louis
de Boode, Willem-Pieter
Scolletta, Sabino
Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
De Backer, Daniel
Walley, Keith R
Maggiorini, Marco
Singer, Mervyn
Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title_full Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title_fullStr Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title_short Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
title_sort clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10291
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentjeanlouis clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT rhodesandrew clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT perelazriel clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT martingregs clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT roccagiorgiodella clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT valletbenoit clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT pinskymichaelr clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT hoferchristophk clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT tebouljeanlouis clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT deboodewillempieter clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT scollettasabino clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT vieillardbaronantoine clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT debackerdaniel clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT walleykeithr clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT maggiorinimarco clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16
AT singermervyn clinicalreviewupdateonhemodynamicmonitoringaconsensusof16