Cargando…

'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Rapid Response Systems were created to minimise delays in recognition and treatment of deteriorating patients on general wards. Physiological 'track and trigger' systems are used to alert a team with critical care skills to stabilise patients and expedite admission to intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oglesby, Kieran J, Durham, Lesley, Welch, John, Subbe, Christian P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10329
_version_ 1782237110756966400
author Oglesby, Kieran J
Durham, Lesley
Welch, John
Subbe, Christian P
author_facet Oglesby, Kieran J
Durham, Lesley
Welch, John
Subbe, Christian P
author_sort Oglesby, Kieran J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rapid Response Systems were created to minimise delays in recognition and treatment of deteriorating patients on general wards. Physiological 'track and trigger' systems are used to alert a team with critical care skills to stabilise patients and expedite admission to intensive care units. No benchmarking tool exists to facilitate comparison for quality assurance. This study was designed to create and test a tool to analyse the efficiency of intensive care admission processes. METHODS: We conducted a pilot multicentre service evaluation of patients admitted to 17 intensive care units from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Denmark, United States of America and Australia. Physiological abnormalities were recorded via a standardised track and trigger score (VitalPAC™ Early Warning Score). The period between the time of initial physiological abnormality (Score) and admission to intensive care (Door) was recorded as 'Score to Door Time'. Participants subsequently suggested causes for admission delays. RESULTS: Score to Door Time for 177 admissions was a median of 4:10 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 1:49 to 9:10). Time from physiological trigger to activation of a Rapid Response System was a median 0:47 hours (IQR 0:00 to 2:15). Time from call-out to intensive care admission was a median of 2:45 hours (IQR 1:19 to 6:32). A total of 127 (71%) admissions were deemed to have been delayed. Stepwise linear regression analysis yielded three significant predictors of longer Score to Door Time: being treated in a British centre, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and increasing age. Binary regression analysis demonstrated a significant association (P < 0.045) of APACHE II scores >20 with Score to Door Times greater than the median 4:10 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Score to Door Time seemed to be largely independent of illness severity and, when combined with qualitative feedback from centres, suggests that admission delays could be due to organisational issues, rather than patient factors. Score to Door Time could act as a suitable benchmarking tool for Rapid Response Systems and helps to delineate avoidable organisational delays in the care of patients at risk of catastrophic deterioration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3387623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33876232012-07-02 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation Oglesby, Kieran J Durham, Lesley Welch, John Subbe, Christian P Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Rapid Response Systems were created to minimise delays in recognition and treatment of deteriorating patients on general wards. Physiological 'track and trigger' systems are used to alert a team with critical care skills to stabilise patients and expedite admission to intensive care units. No benchmarking tool exists to facilitate comparison for quality assurance. This study was designed to create and test a tool to analyse the efficiency of intensive care admission processes. METHODS: We conducted a pilot multicentre service evaluation of patients admitted to 17 intensive care units from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Denmark, United States of America and Australia. Physiological abnormalities were recorded via a standardised track and trigger score (VitalPAC™ Early Warning Score). The period between the time of initial physiological abnormality (Score) and admission to intensive care (Door) was recorded as 'Score to Door Time'. Participants subsequently suggested causes for admission delays. RESULTS: Score to Door Time for 177 admissions was a median of 4:10 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 1:49 to 9:10). Time from physiological trigger to activation of a Rapid Response System was a median 0:47 hours (IQR 0:00 to 2:15). Time from call-out to intensive care admission was a median of 2:45 hours (IQR 1:19 to 6:32). A total of 127 (71%) admissions were deemed to have been delayed. Stepwise linear regression analysis yielded three significant predictors of longer Score to Door Time: being treated in a British centre, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and increasing age. Binary regression analysis demonstrated a significant association (P < 0.045) of APACHE II scores >20 with Score to Door Times greater than the median 4:10 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Score to Door Time seemed to be largely independent of illness severity and, when combined with qualitative feedback from centres, suggests that admission delays could be due to organisational issues, rather than patient factors. Score to Door Time could act as a suitable benchmarking tool for Rapid Response Systems and helps to delineate avoidable organisational delays in the care of patients at risk of catastrophic deterioration. BioMed Central 2011 2011-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3387623/ /pubmed/21794137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10329 Text en Copyright ©2011 Oglesby et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Oglesby, Kieran J
Durham, Lesley
Welch, John
Subbe, Christian P
'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title_full 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title_fullStr 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title_full_unstemmed 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title_short 'Score to Door Time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
title_sort 'score to door time', a benchmarking tool for rapid response systems: a pilot multi-centre service evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10329
work_keys_str_mv AT oglesbykieranj scoretodoortimeabenchmarkingtoolforrapidresponsesystemsapilotmulticentreserviceevaluation
AT durhamlesley scoretodoortimeabenchmarkingtoolforrapidresponsesystemsapilotmulticentreserviceevaluation
AT welchjohn scoretodoortimeabenchmarkingtoolforrapidresponsesystemsapilotmulticentreserviceevaluation
AT subbechristianp scoretodoortimeabenchmarkingtoolforrapidresponsesystemsapilotmulticentreserviceevaluation