Cargando…
Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367 |
_version_ | 1782237114881015808 |
---|---|
author | Marsch, Stephan C Steiner, Luzius Bucher, Evelyne Pargger, Hans Schumann, Martin Aebi, Timothy Hunziker, Patrick R Siegemund, Martin |
author_facet | Marsch, Stephan C Steiner, Luzius Bucher, Evelyne Pargger, Hans Schumann, Martin Aebi, Timothy Hunziker, Patrick R Siegemund, Martin |
author_sort | Marsch, Stephan C |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine and rocuronium have not been compared in an adequately powered randomized trial in intensive care. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of hypoxemia after rocuronium or succinylcholine in critically ill patients requiring an emergent RSI. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled single-blind trial conducted from 2006 to 2010 at the University Hospital of Basel. Participants were 401 critically ill patients requiring emergent RSI. Patients were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturations defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5%, assessed by continuous pulse oxymetry, at any time between the start of the induction sequence and two minutes after the completion of the intubation. A severe oxygen desaturation was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5% leading to a saturation value of ≤ 80%. RESULTS: There was no difference between succinylcholine and rocuronium regarding oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 73/196; rocuronium 66/195; P = 0.67); severe oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 20/196; rocuronium 20/195; P = 1.0); and extent of oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine -14 ± 12%; rocuronium -16 ± 13%; P = 0.77). The duration of the intubation sequence was shorter after succinycholine than after rocuronium (81 ± 38 sec versus 95 ± 48 sec; P = 0.002). Intubation conditions (succinylcholine 8.3 ± 0.8; rocuronium 8.2 ± 0.9; P = 0.7) and failed first intubation attempts (succinylcholine 32/200; rocuronium 36/201; P = 1.0) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients undergoing emergent RSI, incidence and severity of oxygen desaturations, the quality of intubation conditions, and incidence of failed intubation attempts did not differ between succinylcholine and rocuronium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00355368. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3387641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33876412012-07-02 Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial Marsch, Stephan C Steiner, Luzius Bucher, Evelyne Pargger, Hans Schumann, Martin Aebi, Timothy Hunziker, Patrick R Siegemund, Martin Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine and rocuronium have not been compared in an adequately powered randomized trial in intensive care. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of hypoxemia after rocuronium or succinylcholine in critically ill patients requiring an emergent RSI. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled single-blind trial conducted from 2006 to 2010 at the University Hospital of Basel. Participants were 401 critically ill patients requiring emergent RSI. Patients were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturations defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5%, assessed by continuous pulse oxymetry, at any time between the start of the induction sequence and two minutes after the completion of the intubation. A severe oxygen desaturation was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5% leading to a saturation value of ≤ 80%. RESULTS: There was no difference between succinylcholine and rocuronium regarding oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 73/196; rocuronium 66/195; P = 0.67); severe oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 20/196; rocuronium 20/195; P = 1.0); and extent of oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine -14 ± 12%; rocuronium -16 ± 13%; P = 0.77). The duration of the intubation sequence was shorter after succinycholine than after rocuronium (81 ± 38 sec versus 95 ± 48 sec; P = 0.002). Intubation conditions (succinylcholine 8.3 ± 0.8; rocuronium 8.2 ± 0.9; P = 0.7) and failed first intubation attempts (succinylcholine 32/200; rocuronium 36/201; P = 1.0) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients undergoing emergent RSI, incidence and severity of oxygen desaturations, the quality of intubation conditions, and incidence of failed intubation attempts did not differ between succinylcholine and rocuronium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00355368. BioMed Central 2011 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3387641/ /pubmed/21846380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367 Text en Copyright ©2011 Marsch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Marsch, Stephan C Steiner, Luzius Bucher, Evelyne Pargger, Hans Schumann, Martin Aebi, Timothy Hunziker, Patrick R Siegemund, Martin Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title | Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marschstephanc succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT steinerluzius succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bucherevelyne succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parggerhans succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schumannmartin succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aebitimothy succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hunzikerpatrickr succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT siegemundmartin succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |