Cargando…

Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsch, Stephan C, Steiner, Luzius, Bucher, Evelyne, Pargger, Hans, Schumann, Martin, Aebi, Timothy, Hunziker, Patrick R, Siegemund, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367
_version_ 1782237114881015808
author Marsch, Stephan C
Steiner, Luzius
Bucher, Evelyne
Pargger, Hans
Schumann, Martin
Aebi, Timothy
Hunziker, Patrick R
Siegemund, Martin
author_facet Marsch, Stephan C
Steiner, Luzius
Bucher, Evelyne
Pargger, Hans
Schumann, Martin
Aebi, Timothy
Hunziker, Patrick R
Siegemund, Martin
author_sort Marsch, Stephan C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine and rocuronium have not been compared in an adequately powered randomized trial in intensive care. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of hypoxemia after rocuronium or succinylcholine in critically ill patients requiring an emergent RSI. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled single-blind trial conducted from 2006 to 2010 at the University Hospital of Basel. Participants were 401 critically ill patients requiring emergent RSI. Patients were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturations defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5%, assessed by continuous pulse oxymetry, at any time between the start of the induction sequence and two minutes after the completion of the intubation. A severe oxygen desaturation was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5% leading to a saturation value of ≤ 80%. RESULTS: There was no difference between succinylcholine and rocuronium regarding oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 73/196; rocuronium 66/195; P = 0.67); severe oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 20/196; rocuronium 20/195; P = 1.0); and extent of oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine -14 ± 12%; rocuronium -16 ± 13%; P = 0.77). The duration of the intubation sequence was shorter after succinycholine than after rocuronium (81 ± 38 sec versus 95 ± 48 sec; P = 0.002). Intubation conditions (succinylcholine 8.3 ± 0.8; rocuronium 8.2 ± 0.9; P = 0.7) and failed first intubation attempts (succinylcholine 32/200; rocuronium 36/201; P = 1.0) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients undergoing emergent RSI, incidence and severity of oxygen desaturations, the quality of intubation conditions, and incidence of failed intubation attempts did not differ between succinylcholine and rocuronium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00355368.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3387641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33876412012-07-02 Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial Marsch, Stephan C Steiner, Luzius Bucher, Evelyne Pargger, Hans Schumann, Martin Aebi, Timothy Hunziker, Patrick R Siegemund, Martin Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Succinylcholine and rocuronium are widely used to facilitate rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation in intensive care. Concerns relate to the side effects of succinylcholine and to slower onset and inferior intubation conditions associated with rocuronium. So far, succinylcholine and rocuronium have not been compared in an adequately powered randomized trial in intensive care. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of hypoxemia after rocuronium or succinylcholine in critically ill patients requiring an emergent RSI. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled single-blind trial conducted from 2006 to 2010 at the University Hospital of Basel. Participants were 401 critically ill patients requiring emergent RSI. Patients were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg succinylcholine or 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturations defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5%, assessed by continuous pulse oxymetry, at any time between the start of the induction sequence and two minutes after the completion of the intubation. A severe oxygen desaturation was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation ≥ 5% leading to a saturation value of ≤ 80%. RESULTS: There was no difference between succinylcholine and rocuronium regarding oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 73/196; rocuronium 66/195; P = 0.67); severe oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine 20/196; rocuronium 20/195; P = 1.0); and extent of oxygen desaturations (succinylcholine -14 ± 12%; rocuronium -16 ± 13%; P = 0.77). The duration of the intubation sequence was shorter after succinycholine than after rocuronium (81 ± 38 sec versus 95 ± 48 sec; P = 0.002). Intubation conditions (succinylcholine 8.3 ± 0.8; rocuronium 8.2 ± 0.9; P = 0.7) and failed first intubation attempts (succinylcholine 32/200; rocuronium 36/201; P = 1.0) did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients undergoing emergent RSI, incidence and severity of oxygen desaturations, the quality of intubation conditions, and incidence of failed intubation attempts did not differ between succinylcholine and rocuronium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00355368. BioMed Central 2011 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3387641/ /pubmed/21846380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367 Text en Copyright ©2011 Marsch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Marsch, Stephan C
Steiner, Luzius
Bucher, Evelyne
Pargger, Hans
Schumann, Martin
Aebi, Timothy
Hunziker, Patrick R
Siegemund, Martin
Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21846380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10367
work_keys_str_mv AT marschstephanc succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steinerluzius succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bucherevelyne succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parggerhans succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schumannmartin succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aebitimothy succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hunzikerpatrickr succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siegemundmartin succinylcholineversusrocuroniumforrapidsequenceintubationinintensivecareaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial