Cargando…

Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin

Our study sought to compare the strain types of Clostridium difficile causing initial and recurrent episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adult patients with a first episode of CDI or 1 prior episode of CDI within the previous 90 days. Strains originated from patients who had been entered into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueroa, Iris, Johnson, Stuart, Sambol, Susan P., Goldstein, Ellie J. C., Citron, Diane M., Gerding, Dale N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22752857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis357
_version_ 1782237131468439552
author Figueroa, Iris
Johnson, Stuart
Sambol, Susan P.
Goldstein, Ellie J. C.
Citron, Diane M.
Gerding, Dale N.
author_facet Figueroa, Iris
Johnson, Stuart
Sambol, Susan P.
Goldstein, Ellie J. C.
Citron, Diane M.
Gerding, Dale N.
author_sort Figueroa, Iris
collection PubMed
description Our study sought to compare the strain types of Clostridium difficile causing initial and recurrent episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adult patients with a first episode of CDI or 1 prior episode of CDI within the previous 90 days. Strains originated from patients who had been entered into two phase 3 randomized clinical trials of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. Isolates of C. difficile from the initial and recurrent episodes within 28 (±2) days of cure of CDI were compared using restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing. Paired isolates were available from 90 of 194 (46%) patients with recurrent CDI. Patients with isolates available were significantly younger (P = .008) and more likely to be from Canadian sites (P = .0001), compared with patients without isolates. In 75 of 90 subjects (83.3%), the identical REA type strain was identified at recurrence and the initial episode (putative relapse). Early recurrences (0–14 days after treatment completion) were relapses in 86.7% and a new strain (reinfection) in 13.3%. Later recurrences (15–31 days after treatment) were relapses in 76.7% and reinfections in 23.3%. Mean time (± standard deviation) to recurrence was 12.2 (±6.4) days for relapses and 14.7 (±6.8) days for reinfections (P = .177). The most common BI/NAP1/027 group and the previous US epidemic REA group J/NAP2/001 had a significantly higher combined rate of recurrence with the same strain (relapse), compared with the other REA groups (39 of 42 [93%] vs 36 of 48 [75%], respectively; P = .023). We found a higher than historic rate of recurrent CDI caused by the same isolate as the original episode, a finding that may be related to the relatively short observation period in this study and the high frequency of isolation of epidemic strains, such as groups BI and J, for which relapse rates may be higher than for other REA groups. Caution in generalizing these observations is required, because the patients studied were younger and more likely to be from Canadian sites than were patients with recurrence who did not provide isolates. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00314951 and NCT00468728.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3388025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33880252012-08-01 Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin Figueroa, Iris Johnson, Stuart Sambol, Susan P. Goldstein, Ellie J. C. Citron, Diane M. Gerding, Dale N. Clin Infect Dis Supplement Articles Our study sought to compare the strain types of Clostridium difficile causing initial and recurrent episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adult patients with a first episode of CDI or 1 prior episode of CDI within the previous 90 days. Strains originated from patients who had been entered into two phase 3 randomized clinical trials of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. Isolates of C. difficile from the initial and recurrent episodes within 28 (±2) days of cure of CDI were compared using restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing. Paired isolates were available from 90 of 194 (46%) patients with recurrent CDI. Patients with isolates available were significantly younger (P = .008) and more likely to be from Canadian sites (P = .0001), compared with patients without isolates. In 75 of 90 subjects (83.3%), the identical REA type strain was identified at recurrence and the initial episode (putative relapse). Early recurrences (0–14 days after treatment completion) were relapses in 86.7% and a new strain (reinfection) in 13.3%. Later recurrences (15–31 days after treatment) were relapses in 76.7% and reinfections in 23.3%. Mean time (± standard deviation) to recurrence was 12.2 (±6.4) days for relapses and 14.7 (±6.8) days for reinfections (P = .177). The most common BI/NAP1/027 group and the previous US epidemic REA group J/NAP2/001 had a significantly higher combined rate of recurrence with the same strain (relapse), compared with the other REA groups (39 of 42 [93%] vs 36 of 48 [75%], respectively; P = .023). We found a higher than historic rate of recurrent CDI caused by the same isolate as the original episode, a finding that may be related to the relatively short observation period in this study and the high frequency of isolation of epidemic strains, such as groups BI and J, for which relapse rates may be higher than for other REA groups. Caution in generalizing these observations is required, because the patients studied were younger and more likely to be from Canadian sites than were patients with recurrence who did not provide isolates. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00314951 and NCT00468728. Oxford University Press 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3388025/ /pubmed/22752857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis357 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Figueroa, Iris
Johnson, Stuart
Sambol, Susan P.
Goldstein, Ellie J. C.
Citron, Diane M.
Gerding, Dale N.
Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title_full Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title_fullStr Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title_full_unstemmed Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title_short Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
title_sort relapse versus reinfection: recurrent clostridium difficile infection following treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22752857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis357
work_keys_str_mv AT figueroairis relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin
AT johnsonstuart relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin
AT sambolsusanp relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin
AT goldsteinelliejc relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin
AT citrondianem relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin
AT gerdingdalen relapseversusreinfectionrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionfollowingtreatmentwithfidaxomicinorvancomycin