Cargando…

Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine

Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Yu-Ying, Zhou, Jie, Ren, Xiao-Hui, Lin, Xue-Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132
_version_ 1782237169352441856
author Tang, Yu-Ying
Zhou, Jie
Ren, Xiao-Hui
Lin, Xue-Mei
author_facet Tang, Yu-Ying
Zhou, Jie
Ren, Xiao-Hui
Lin, Xue-Mei
author_sort Tang, Yu-Ying
collection PubMed
description Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between nonlaboring and laboring parturients using CSE technique. Methods. Twenty-five nonlaboring (Group NL) and twenty-five laboring parturients (Group L) undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled. Following identification of the epidural space at the L3-4 interspace, plain bupivacaine 10 mg was administered intrathecally using CSE technique. The level of sensory block, degree of motor block, and hemodynamic changes were assessed. Results. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the maximal decrease of SBP in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group NL (P = 0.002 and P = 0.03, resp.). The median sensory level tested by cold stimulation was T6 for Group NL and T5 for Group L (P = 0.46). The median sensory level tested by pinprick was T7 for both groups (P = 0.35). The degree of motor block was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.85). Conclusion. We did not detect significant differences in the sensory block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using CSE technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3388316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33883162012-07-09 Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine Tang, Yu-Ying Zhou, Jie Ren, Xiao-Hui Lin, Xue-Mei Anesthesiol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between nonlaboring and laboring parturients using CSE technique. Methods. Twenty-five nonlaboring (Group NL) and twenty-five laboring parturients (Group L) undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled. Following identification of the epidural space at the L3-4 interspace, plain bupivacaine 10 mg was administered intrathecally using CSE technique. The level of sensory block, degree of motor block, and hemodynamic changes were assessed. Results. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the maximal decrease of SBP in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group NL (P = 0.002 and P = 0.03, resp.). The median sensory level tested by cold stimulation was T6 for Group NL and T5 for Group L (P = 0.46). The median sensory level tested by pinprick was T7 for both groups (P = 0.35). The degree of motor block was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.85). Conclusion. We did not detect significant differences in the sensory block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using CSE technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3388316/ /pubmed/22778727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132 Text en Copyright © 2012 Yu-Ying Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Tang, Yu-Ying
Zhou, Jie
Ren, Xiao-Hui
Lin, Xue-Mei
Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title_full Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title_fullStr Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title_short Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
title_sort comparison of spinal block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using combined spinal epidural technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132
work_keys_str_mv AT tangyuying comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine
AT zhoujie comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine
AT renxiaohui comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine
AT linxuemei comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine