Cargando…
Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine
Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132 |
_version_ | 1782237169352441856 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Yu-Ying Zhou, Jie Ren, Xiao-Hui Lin, Xue-Mei |
author_facet | Tang, Yu-Ying Zhou, Jie Ren, Xiao-Hui Lin, Xue-Mei |
author_sort | Tang, Yu-Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between nonlaboring and laboring parturients using CSE technique. Methods. Twenty-five nonlaboring (Group NL) and twenty-five laboring parturients (Group L) undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled. Following identification of the epidural space at the L3-4 interspace, plain bupivacaine 10 mg was administered intrathecally using CSE technique. The level of sensory block, degree of motor block, and hemodynamic changes were assessed. Results. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the maximal decrease of SBP in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group NL (P = 0.002 and P = 0.03, resp.). The median sensory level tested by cold stimulation was T6 for Group NL and T5 for Group L (P = 0.46). The median sensory level tested by pinprick was T7 for both groups (P = 0.35). The degree of motor block was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.85). Conclusion. We did not detect significant differences in the sensory block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using CSE technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3388316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33883162012-07-09 Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine Tang, Yu-Ying Zhou, Jie Ren, Xiao-Hui Lin, Xue-Mei Anesthesiol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. It was suggested that labor may influence the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine using combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. However, no previous studies investigated this proposition. We designed this study to investigate the spinal block characteristics of plain bupivacaine between nonlaboring and laboring parturients using CSE technique. Methods. Twenty-five nonlaboring (Group NL) and twenty-five laboring parturients (Group L) undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled. Following identification of the epidural space at the L3-4 interspace, plain bupivacaine 10 mg was administered intrathecally using CSE technique. The level of sensory block, degree of motor block, and hemodynamic changes were assessed. Results. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the maximal decrease of SBP in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group NL (P = 0.002 and P = 0.03, resp.). The median sensory level tested by cold stimulation was T6 for Group NL and T5 for Group L (P = 0.46). The median sensory level tested by pinprick was T7 for both groups (P = 0.35). The degree of motor block was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.85). Conclusion. We did not detect significant differences in the sensory block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using CSE technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3388316/ /pubmed/22778727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132 Text en Copyright © 2012 Yu-Ying Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Tang, Yu-Ying Zhou, Jie Ren, Xiao-Hui Lin, Xue-Mei Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title | Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title_full | Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title_short | Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine |
title_sort | comparison of spinal block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using combined spinal epidural technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/187132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangyuying comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine AT zhoujie comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine AT renxiaohui comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine AT linxuemei comparisonofspinalblocklevelsbetweenlaboringandnonlaboringparturientsusingcombinedspinalepiduraltechniquewithintrathecalplainbupivacaine |