Cargando…
The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as ro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240 |
_version_ | 1782237178211860480 |
---|---|
author | Erdoğan, Özlem Tanyeri, Bilge Torun, Emel Gönüllü, Erdem Arslan, Hüseyin Erenberk, Ufuk Öktem, Faruk |
author_facet | Erdoğan, Özlem Tanyeri, Bilge Torun, Emel Gönüllü, Erdem Arslan, Hüseyin Erenberk, Ufuk Öktem, Faruk |
author_sort | Erdoğan, Özlem |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis were included in the study. The patients diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis by latex agglutination test in stool were divided into 3 groups of twenty-five patients each: First group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Saccharomyces boulardii (spp. I-745), second group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis (spp. B94, culture number:N°118529) and third group received only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Results. The duration of diarrhea was shorter in the group given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis and Saccharomyces boulardii than the group given only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Conclusion. Bifidobacterium lactis has a complemental role in the treatment of rotavirus gatroenteritis and other probiotics may also have a beneficial effect in rotavirus gastroenteritis compared with the therapy included only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3388355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33883552012-07-09 The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children Erdoğan, Özlem Tanyeri, Bilge Torun, Emel Gönüllü, Erdem Arslan, Hüseyin Erenberk, Ufuk Öktem, Faruk J Trop Med Clinical Study Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis were included in the study. The patients diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis by latex agglutination test in stool were divided into 3 groups of twenty-five patients each: First group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Saccharomyces boulardii (spp. I-745), second group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis (spp. B94, culture number:N°118529) and third group received only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Results. The duration of diarrhea was shorter in the group given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis and Saccharomyces boulardii than the group given only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Conclusion. Bifidobacterium lactis has a complemental role in the treatment of rotavirus gatroenteritis and other probiotics may also have a beneficial effect in rotavirus gastroenteritis compared with the therapy included only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3388355/ /pubmed/22778754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240 Text en Copyright © 2012 Özlem Erdoğan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Erdoğan, Özlem Tanyeri, Bilge Torun, Emel Gönüllü, Erdem Arslan, Hüseyin Erenberk, Ufuk Öktem, Faruk The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title | The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title_full | The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title_fullStr | The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title_short | The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children |
title_sort | comparition of the efficacy of two different probiotics in rotavirus gastroenteritis in children |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erdoganozlem thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT tanyeribilge thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT torunemel thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT gonulluerdem thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT arslanhuseyin thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT erenberkufuk thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT oktemfaruk thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT erdoganozlem comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT tanyeribilge comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT torunemel comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT gonulluerdem comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT arslanhuseyin comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT erenberkufuk comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren AT oktemfaruk comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren |