Cargando…

The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children

Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erdoğan, Özlem, Tanyeri, Bilge, Torun, Emel, Gönüllü, Erdem, Arslan, Hüseyin, Erenberk, Ufuk, Öktem, Faruk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240
_version_ 1782237178211860480
author Erdoğan, Özlem
Tanyeri, Bilge
Torun, Emel
Gönüllü, Erdem
Arslan, Hüseyin
Erenberk, Ufuk
Öktem, Faruk
author_facet Erdoğan, Özlem
Tanyeri, Bilge
Torun, Emel
Gönüllü, Erdem
Arslan, Hüseyin
Erenberk, Ufuk
Öktem, Faruk
author_sort Erdoğan, Özlem
collection PubMed
description Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis were included in the study. The patients diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis by latex agglutination test in stool were divided into 3 groups of twenty-five patients each: First group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Saccharomyces boulardii (spp. I-745), second group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis (spp. B94, culture number:N°118529) and third group received only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Results. The duration of diarrhea was shorter in the group given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis and Saccharomyces boulardii than the group given only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Conclusion. Bifidobacterium lactis has a complemental role in the treatment of rotavirus gatroenteritis and other probiotics may also have a beneficial effect in rotavirus gastroenteritis compared with the therapy included only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3388355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33883552012-07-09 The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children Erdoğan, Özlem Tanyeri, Bilge Torun, Emel Gönüllü, Erdem Arslan, Hüseyin Erenberk, Ufuk Öktem, Faruk J Trop Med Clinical Study Objectives. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium lactis—in children who had been diagnosed with rotavirus gastroenteritis. Materials and methods. Seventy five patients aged between 5 months–5 years diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis were included in the study. The patients diagnosed as rotavirus gastroenteritis by latex agglutination test in stool were divided into 3 groups of twenty-five patients each: First group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Saccharomyces boulardii (spp. I-745), second group was given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis (spp. B94, culture number:N°118529) and third group received only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Results. The duration of diarrhea was shorter in the group given oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet with Bifidobacterium lactis and Saccharomyces boulardii than the group given only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Conclusion. Bifidobacterium lactis has a complemental role in the treatment of rotavirus gatroenteritis and other probiotics may also have a beneficial effect in rotavirus gastroenteritis compared with the therapy included only oral rehydration therapy and rapid refeeding with a normal diet. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3388355/ /pubmed/22778754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240 Text en Copyright © 2012 Özlem Erdoğan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Erdoğan, Özlem
Tanyeri, Bilge
Torun, Emel
Gönüllü, Erdem
Arslan, Hüseyin
Erenberk, Ufuk
Öktem, Faruk
The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title_full The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title_fullStr The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title_full_unstemmed The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title_short The Comparition of the Efficacy of Two Different Probiotics in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children
title_sort comparition of the efficacy of two different probiotics in rotavirus gastroenteritis in children
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/787240
work_keys_str_mv AT erdoganozlem thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT tanyeribilge thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT torunemel thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT gonulluerdem thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT arslanhuseyin thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT erenberkufuk thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT oktemfaruk thecomparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT erdoganozlem comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT tanyeribilge comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT torunemel comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT gonulluerdem comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT arslanhuseyin comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT erenberkufuk comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren
AT oktemfaruk comparitionoftheefficacyoftwodifferentprobioticsinrotavirusgastroenteritisinchildren